UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF TEACHER DEMOGRAPHICS ON ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING STRATEGIES IN GHANA'S EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

George Oduro-Okyireh

Abstract


This study explores the implementation and effectiveness of Assessment for Learning (AfL) strategies among basic schoolteachers in Ghana, focusing on the influences of gender, teaching experience, and teaching division. Utilising a survey approach, data were collected through a 16-item Assessment for Learning Questionnaire (AfLQ) from a randomly selected sample of 100 teachers. The instrument's reliability and validity were confirmed through a pilot study and expert reviews, achieving a Cronbach's alpha of over 0.7 for all variables. Multinomial regression analysis provided key insights into the effectiveness, variability, and reliability of AfL practices, guiding professional development and future research. Multiple linear regression analyses identified significant correlations among AfL practices, with strong positive relationships between self-assessment, peer assessment, and immediate feedback. Variance plots showed higher variability in the implementation of certain practices among female and subject teachers, indicating a need for more tailored professional development. Additionally, the Test Information Function (TIF) plot revealed distinct proficiency levels, highlighting areas where teachers excel and potential gaps requiring intervention. These findings emphasise the critical role of demographic factors in the application and success of AfL strategies and offer actionable insights for enhancing teacher training programmes. By integrating advanced statistical techniques, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of AfL practices in diverse educational settings, contributing valuable knowledge to the field of educational assessment.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


assessment for learning (AfL), educational assessment, teacher demographics, formative assessment strategies, Ghanaian educational system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhtar, M., & Saeed, M. (2020). Assessing the Effect of Agree/Disagree Circles, Exit Ticket, and Think-Pair-Share on Students' Academic Achievement at Undergraduate Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 81-96.

Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.

Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). Routledge.

Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 27(4), 350-372.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 18(1), 5-25.

Black, P., Harrison, C., & Lee, C. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of personnel evaluation in education), 21, 5-31.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575.

Bosson-Amedenu, S., Osei-Asibey, E., & Wiah, E. N. (2020). Use of assessment of learning teaching strategy among basic school teachers in Ghana. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 7(4), 1-11.

Bromley, M. (2019). Practical classroom strategies for effective differentiation. Seced, 2019(11), 25-32.

Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2020). Classroom assessment and educational measurement. Taylor & Francis.

Campbell, K. (2020). Gender and technology: Social context and intersectionality. Handbook of research in educational communications and technology: Learning design, 115-204.

Cañas, A. J., Reiska, P., & Shvaikovsky, O. (2023). Improving Learning and Understanding through Concept Mapping. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(3), 369-380.

DeLuca, C., Coombs, A., & LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2019). Assessment mindset: Exploring the relationship between teacher mindset and approaches to classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 159-169.

DeLuca, C., Valiquette, A., Coombs, A., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2018). Teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: A large-scale survey. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(4), 355-375.

DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.

El-Senousy, H. (2020). How peer assessment could be interactive and effective. South African Journal of Education, 40(2), 1-14.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. ASCD.

Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The elementary school journal, 115(4), 523-547.

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer-and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers' implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101-111.

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Volume introduction: The human and social experience of assessment: Valuing the person and context. In Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 1-18). Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Heritage, M., & Wylie, E. C. (2020). Formative assessment in the disciplines: Framing a continuum of professional learning. Harvard Education Press.

Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. (2018). Connections between teachers’ knowledge of students, instruction, and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1076-1112.

Ketonen, L. (2021). Exploring interconnections between student peer assessment, feedback literacy and agency. JYU dissertations.

Lyman, F. T., Tredway, L., & Purser, M. (2023). Think-pair-share and Thinktrix: Standard bearers of student dialogue. In Contemporary global perspectives on cooperative learning (pp. 124-143). Routledge.

Mandouit, L., & Hattie, J. (2023). Revisiting “The Power of Feedback” from the perspective of the learner. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101718.

Marzano, R. J. (2012). The Two Purposes of. Educational leadership.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.

Osei-Asibey, E., Kusi, P., Nimoh, V., & Bosson-Amedenu, S. (2020). Evaluation of Assessment Strategies Used by Basic School Teachers in Ghana: The Case of Assessment for Learning. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(4), 58-66.

Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio. Educational leadership, 48(5), 60-63.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. ASCD.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.

Stančić, M. (2021). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 852-864.

Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5-15.

Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., & Chappuis, J. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right, using it well. Assessment Training Institute.

Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational leadership, 57, 12-17.

Topali, P., Ortega-Arranz, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Martínez-Monés, A., & Asensio-Pérez, J. I. (2024). Unlock the Feedback Potential: Scaling Effective Teacher-Led Interventions in Massive Educational Contexts. In Innovating Assessment and Feedback Design in Teacher Education (pp. 1-19). Routledge.

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational research, 68(3), 249-276.

Topping, K., Buchs, C., Duran, D., & Van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge.

Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339-343.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution tree press.

Wiliam, D. (2020). Research into practice: The case of classroom formative assessment. In Getting Evidence into Education (pp. 119-135). Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i10.5552

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 George Oduro-Okyireh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).