ASSESSING SCHOLARSHIP: AN ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH APPRECIATION BY GHANAIAN ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS

Francis Justice Kwesi Agbofa

Abstract


The study sought to analyze academic research appreciation by research faculty of Ghanaian universities and colleges of education. The study is underpinned by the social exchange theory and used a quantitative approach, where an electronic questionnaire based on items and scales identified in literature was shared on social media platforms of academic faculties of Ghanaian universities and colleges of education. A total sample of 1175 was considered. The data generated from respondents’ submission of the electronic questionnaire was analyzed with SPSS using descriptive and inferential statistics, where means with standard deviations and independent samples t-tests with eta statistics were the units of analysis. The study revealed statistically significant differences in (1) access to research, (2) utilization of research, and (3) practice of and engagement in research between faculty of universities and colleges of education. The study found no significant difference in what respondents perceived of the worth of research between the two classes of faculty. The study identified that Ghanaian academic researchers have limited access to research, and moderately use existing research per their limited access. The study found that respondents consider themselves as having more to achieve in research as they identified as having moderate experience. In terms of perception of the worth of research, the study revealed that academic researchers see research as a very important dimension of their career for its relevance to their instruction. The study recommends that efforts should be made to bridge the difference in scholarship between universities and colleges of education. Again, research training and collaborations should be prioritized in higher education. Lastly, institutions of higher learning should ensure easy access to research.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


scholarship, comparative, research, appreciation, Ghanaian faculty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agada, J. (2000). Knowledge Seeking Behavior in an Inner-City Community: Assessment of a First-Generation Universal Service Program. In Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting (Vol. 37, pp. 149-58).

Åkerlind, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in higher education, 9(3), 363-375.

Ali, S., Jan, S., & Amin, I. (2013). Status of open access repositories: a global perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 1(1), 35.

Amadu, C. D., Fevlo, E. S., & Gato, C. C. (2023). Implementation of learner-centred curriculum in the colleges of education in Ghana: an assessment of chemistry tutors' classroom practices. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2).

Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W. & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.

Björk, B. C. (2017). Gold, green and black open access. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 173-175.

Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in higher education, 26(3), 271-285.

Cherryholmes, C. H. (1993). Reading research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 1-32.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

de Vries, B. B. P., van Smeden, M., Rosendaal, F. R., & Groenwold, R. H. (2020). Title, abstract, and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 121, 55-61.

Dlamini, N. N., & Snyman, M. (2017). Institutional repositories in Africa: obstacles and challenges. Library Review, 66(6/7), 535-548.

Du, J. T., & Evans, N. (2011). Academic users' information searching on research topics: Characteristics of research tasks and search strategies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 299-306.

Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Longwood Division, Allyn and Bacon, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA 02194-2310.

Felder, R. M. (1994). The myth of the superhuman professor. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(2), 105-110.

Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education's strategic imperative. Jossey-Bass.

Gray, P. J. (1996). A National Study on the Relative Importance of Research and Undergraduate Teaching at Colleges and Universities, with Executive Summary.

Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century. Oxford University Press.

Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183-201.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace.

Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. Rev. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., & Allen, D. D. (2018). Academic reading: Comparing students’ and faculty perceptions of its value, practice, and pedagogy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48(3), 189-209.

Howe, L. C., Jachimowicz, J. M., & Menges, J. I. (2021). Your Job Doesn’t Have to Be Your Passion. Retrieved March 27, 2024, from https://hbr.org/2021/06/your-job-doesnt-have-to-be-your-passion

Huber, M. T. (2006). Disciplines, Pedagogy, and Inquiry-Based Learning about Teaching. New directions for teaching and learning, 107, 69-77.

Jain, P. (2012). Promoting open access to research in academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1.

Jenkins, A. (2004). A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. York: Higher Education Academy.

Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and instruction, 7(3), 255-275.

Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365-383.

Manarin, K., Carey, M., Rathburn, M., & Ryland, G. (2015). Critical reading in higher education: Academic goals and social engagement. Indiana University Press.

Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The journal of higher education, 73(5), 603-641.

Mohammed, A. (2013). Institutional digital repository: An option for scholarly communication in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(6), 1-10.

Müngen, A. A., & Kaya, M. (2018). Extracting abstract and keywords from context for academic articles. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8, 1-11.

National Accreditation Board (NAB). (2020). Tertiary education statistics: Annual statistics report 2019. Available at https://gtec.edu.gh/download/file/TEI%20Statistical%20Report%202019.pdf.

Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23(2), 159-171.

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., ... & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.

Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Krieger Publishing Co., PO Box 9542, Melbourne, FL 32902-9542.

Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 283-294.

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Relational Perspectives on Higher Education Teaching and Learning in the Sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269908560135

Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(3), 273-295.

Rugarcia, A. (1991). The Link between Teaching and Research: Myth or Possibility? Engineering Education, 81(1), 20-22.

Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher education, 41, 299-325.

Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access.

Sheehy, Meghan Kilpatrick (2016). A Quantitative Analysis of the Relationship Between K–12 Music Educators and Collegiate Music Education Researchers and Instructors: Is There a Disconnect?. Dissertations. 349. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/349

Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C. K., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2021). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1123-1143.

Smith, E. T. (2003). Changes in faculty reading behaviours: The impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 162-168.

T-TEL. (2018). Endline survey report: Phase 1. Accra: T-TEL.

uz Zaman, M. Q. (2004). Review of the academic evidence on the relationship between teaching and research in higher education (pp. 1-122). London: Department for Education and Skills.

Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 426-429.

Zhang, L., Wei, Y., Huang, Y., & Sivertsen, G. (2022). Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7653-7679.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i10.5570

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Francis Justice Kwesi Agbofa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).