Srinivasa Rao Idapalapati


A review of the opposing arguments with regard to the practices of assessment teaching/learning and the ideal of holistic teaching/learning in education leads to hypothesize that higher test scores in assessment learning also reflect the quality of learning and personalities that holistic education ideology advocates. The acquisition of holistic ideals is a qualitative phenomenon that is identifiable only through the behavior of an individual since the holistic concept involves the knowledge, skills and values required for citizens in making decisions that are responsible and democratic (Badjanova & Iliško 2015). In an effort to find out the extent to which ‘scores in tests’ in assessment learning reflect the quality of the behavior that holistic learning advocates, a study is taken up at an English Language Center (ELC) of a university with the participants from five different batches of students that attended English language programs of different levels and courses. A purposive sample of students that is divided into two groups, with 130 students in each, is taken up for the study. Group A contains the students that scored 70% and more in the previous summative tests and group B carries the students that scored between 50%-70% in the tests. A questionnaire that forms a Likert Scale was prepared in light of the holistic ideals delivered by Krishnamurti (1974; 1989) on education. The questionnaire was distributed to the groups of participants followed by personal interviews with them. The quantitative data analysis of the responses was done using SPSS and ANOVA soft wares to establish the study hypothesis, and a positive correlation between scores in assessment learning and holistic ideals is established. 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



holistic education, learning, assessment education, value, and purpose of education


Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2008). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ausubel, D. P. (1962). Learning by discovery. Educational Leadership, 20(2), 113-117.

Badders, W. (2000). Methods of assessment. Article accessible on


Badjanova, J., & Iliško, D. (2015). Holistic approach as viewed by the basic school teachers in Latvia. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 132-140.


Ben-Peretz, M. (2009). Policy-making in education: A holistic approach in response to global changes. R&L Education.

Bhatta, C. P. (2009). Holistic Personality Development through Education Ancient Indian Cultural Experiences. Journal of Human Values, 15(1), 49-59.


Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.

Bloom, B. S. Toward a Theory of Testing Which Includes Measurement-Evaluation-Assessment. From the Proceedings of the Symposium on Problems in the Evaluation of Instruction, Dec., 1967 (No. 9). CSEIP Occasional Report. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED036878.pdf

Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5-12.


Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Assessment theory for college classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(100), 5-14.


Choudhary, S. K. (2009). Higher Education in India: a Socio-Historical Journey from Ancient Period to 2006-07. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 8(1).

Dunn, L., Morgan, C., & Parry, S. (2002). Seeking quality in criterion referenced assessment.

Edwards, D. (1998). Data quality control/quality assurance. Data and information management in the ecological sciences: a resource guide. LTER Network Office, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. http://www.ecoinformatics.org/pubs/guide/edwards.fv4.htm

Forbes, S. H. (1996, June). Values in holistic education. In 3rd Annual Conference on Education, Spirituality and the Whole Child. http://www.holistic-education.net/articles/values.pdf

Forbes, S. H. (2003). Holistic education an analysis of its ideas and nature. (The Foundations of Holistic Education Series, V. 8)

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41, 47.

Hammerman, E. (2009). Formative assessment strategies for enhanced learning in science, k-8. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Huitt, W. (2011). A holistic view of education and schooling: Guiding students to develop capacities, acquire virtues, and provide service. Revision of paper presented at the. http://edpsycinteractive.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/holistic-view-of-schooling-rev.pdf

Jarvis, Peter, and Stella Parker. Human Learning: An Holistic Approach. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.

Koretz, D. (2008). A measured approach. American Educator, 32(2), 18-39.


Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. http://rt3region7.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/file/view/8+Perspectives+on+RBT.pdf

Krishnamurti, J. (1974). Krishnamurti on education (Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Limited, Eds.). NewYork: Harper & Row. http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/fr/krishnamurti-teachings/view-context.php?tid=43&chid=297&w=love&s=Context

Krishnamurti, J. (1989). Think on these things. D. Rajagopal (Ed.). HarperPerennial.


Martin, R. A. (2002). Alternatives in Education: An Exploration of Learner-Centered, Progressive, and Holistic Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466453.pdf

Miller, J. (2000). Krishnamurti and holistic education.

Miller, M. (2006). Assessment: A Literature Review. Research and Information Services Bulletin, Scottish Qualifications Authority, Midlothian, Uk .

Miller, R. (1992). What Are Schools For? Holistic Education in American Culture. Revised. Holistic Education Press, 39 Pearl Street, Brandon, VT 05733-0328.


Miller, R (2011). Higher Education and the Journey of Transformation. The Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice, spring, Vol IV, Issue 3.


Montgomery, P. C., & Connolly, B. H. (1987). Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests. Phys Ther, 67, 1873-1876. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d8f0/20b50f45a58f4806bce1062d4ddfc070ed75.pdf

Mookerji, R. K. (1989). Ancient Indian Education: Brahmanical and Buddhist (Vol. 11). Motilal Banarsidass Publishing.

Murphy, D. (2012). Where is the value in value-added modeling. 24–26 September 2014, Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore. http://educatoreffectiveness.pearsonassessments.com/downloads/viva_v1.pdf

Nielsen, T. W. (2006). Towards a pedagogy of imagination: A phenomenological case study of holistic education. Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 247-264.


Patel, N. V. (2003). A holistic approach to learning and teaching interaction: factors in the development of critical learners. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(6), 272-284. http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/0415332168/pdf/article.pdf

Phye, Gary D. Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement, and Adjustment. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997. Print.

Suen, H. K., & Yu, L. (2006). Chronic consequences of high‐stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam. Comparative Education Review, 50(1), 46-65.

Steiner, R. (1997) The roots of education (Hudson, NY, Anthroposophic Press).

Underhill, A. F. (2006). Theories of learning and their implications for on-line assesment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1). http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/viewFile/5000102797/5000095892

Warren, K. (1995). The Theory of Experiential Education. A collection of articles addressing the historical, philosophical, social, and psychological foundations of Experiential Education. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., 4050 Westmark Drive, Dubuque, IA 52004-1840.


Willis, J. (2007). Assessment for learning–Why the theory needs the practice. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(2), 52-59.

Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological bulletin, 119(2), 285.


Zachos, P. (2004). Discovering the true nature of educational assessment. Research Bulletin, 9(2), 7-12.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.581


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Srinivasa Rao Idapalapati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).