CORRECTING WRITING ERRORS: GREEK PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES AND THEIR TEACHING PRACTICES

Vasiliki Marmouta, Georgios D. Kapsalis, Alexandra Galani

Abstract


In modern theories of student assessment, errors are seen as a “learning tool”, since they are considered an integral part of the learning process, which creates opportunities for fruitful discussions, reflection and a critical dialogue not only between teachers and students but also amongst students themselves. In this paper, we focus on writing errors, aiming to explore how Greek primary school teachers view these errors and how they correct them. The analysis of the data, which were collected through the distribution of a questionnaire and classroom observations, led to the following results. First and foremost, the majority of the teachers evaluated the correction of their students’ errors as a process of great necessity and importance. Moreover, most participants responded that they prefer to correct some errors only and in no case all of them, so that their students are not discouraged but they do not focus on specific types of errors. Despite the fact that they prefer their students to correct their own work, the observation data analysis revealed that error correction is performed by the teachers. Regarding the ways errors are corrected, it was found that explicit correction techniques are mainly used. Finally, the teachers choose either to provide general feedback on the students’ work or to personalise the feedback and analyse the errors each student made.

Keywords


writing errors, primary school teachers, attitudes, teaching practices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ampati, A. & Katsarou, Ch. (2015). Production of oral and written language. In D. Papadopoulou, Ε. Agathopoulou & K. Pouliou (Eds.), Support of the function of reception classes: issues of language teaching. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. In Greek.

Amrhein, H.R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 95-127. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ944129

Athanasiou, L. (2007). Research methods and techniques on educational studies. Efira. In Greek.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: a ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Educational research (N. Kouvarakou, Trans.). Ion.

Diab, N.M. (2010). Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008

Dinas, K., Ksanthopoulos, A., & Tsakiridou, E. (2006). Teaching the Greek language in the primary school... twenty years later. In Studies of the Greek language, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Philosophy School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (pp. 356-367). In Greek.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Ferdouse, F. (2013). Learning from mistakes: using correction code to improve student’s writing skill in english composition class. Stamford Journal of English, 7, 62-86. DOI:10.3329/sje.v7i0.14463

Firwana, S. S. (2010). Impact of Palestinian EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Oral Errors on Their Students’ Attitudes and Choice of Error Treatment Strategies [Doctoral dissertation, Boston College University]. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1398

Ganji, M. (2009). Teacher-correction, peer-correction and self-correction: Their impacts on Iranian Students’ IELTS Essay Writing Performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 6, 117-139.

Goulas, V. (2010). Written language at school; teaching practices, pedagogy and ideology. In Greek.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.

Iseni, A. (2011). Assessment, Testing and Correcting Students’ Errors and Mistakes. Language Testing in Asia, 1, 60-90. DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-60

Karakoli, E. (2016). Error analysis in written language of Roma and Albanian-speaking students [ΜΑ Thesis, University of Western Macedonia]. In Greek.

Kubota, M. (2001). Error correction strategies used by learners of Japanese when revising a writing task. System, 29, 467-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00026-4

Lee, I. (2003). How do Hong Kong English teachers correct errors in writing? Educational Journal, 31 (1), 153-169.

Leighton, J.P., Tang, W., & Guo, Q. (2015). Developing and validating the attitudes towards mistakes inventory (ATMI): A Self-Report Measure. In Proceedings of the National Council on Measurement in Education. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Attitudes-Towards-Mistakes-1-Developing-and-the-%28-%29-Leighton/e510631dcb464a7c15959796437fb084902b8354?p2df

Mahmoud, A. (2010). Strategy-based peer assistance in EFL writing: an alternative to traditional peer correction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 1987-1992. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.1987-1992

Marmouta, V., Kapsalis, G. D., & Galani, A. (2025). Greek primary school teachers’ attitudes and teaching practices towards students’ oral errors. International Journal of Education, 17(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v17i2.22674

Mills, G. E., Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2017). Educational Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods-Applications (Α. Fissa, M. Nikolaidou & Ch. Tsorida, Trans.). Propompos. In Greek.

Papadopoulou, S. (2005). Whole language in the teaching of language expression in primary education. Tipothito-Giorgos Dardanos. In Greek.

Rapti, M. (2002). The mistakes of students and their role in the learning process. Gutenberg. In Greek.

Riddell, D. (2011). Teaching English as a foreign language (Teach yourself Series). Hobber & Stoughton.

Robson, C. (2010). Real world research (V. Ntalakou & K. Vasilikou, Trans). Gutenberg. In Greek.

Salteh, M. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2015). Teachers’ and students’ attitudes toward error correction in L2 writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(3), 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2015.12.3.1.1

Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002

Tafani, V. (2009). Correcting or not Errors and Mistakes. LCPJ, 2, 49-57.

Tulis, M. (2013). Error management behavior in classrooms: Teachers’ responses to student mistakes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.003

Valero, A.L., Fernandez, E.E., Iseni, A. & Clarkson, C.P. (2008). Teachers’ attitudes towards correcting students’ written errors and mistakes. Porta Linguarum, 10, 21-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.30827/digibug.31777

Verma, G. K., & Mallick, K. (2004). Educational research: theoretical approaches and techniques (El. Griva, Trans). Tipothito-Giorgos Dardanos. In Greek.

Zarkogianni, E. (2016). Feedback through error correction in written speech; beliefs and practices of Greek Language Teachers in Lower Secondary Schools [PhD thesis, University of Macedonia]. http://dspace.lib.uom.gr/handle/2159/19436. In Greek.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i4.6604

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Vasiliki Marmouta, Georgios D. Kapsalis, Alexandra Galani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).