Christiana Ngozi Ementa, Chika Madu Ile


Education today has gone digital and has created the need for players in the sector to appreciate the benefits of utilizing Web 2.0 technologies for educational purposes. This study set out to assess business educators’ awareness and adoption of adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes in tertiary institutions in south east Nigeria. Two research questions guided the study. Four null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. Population of the study was 144 business educators teaching in tertiary institutions offering business education programme in south east Nigeria. A structured 5-point scale questionnaire was used for the study. The questionnaire was validated by one expert in ICT and two experts in measurement and evaluation. The reliability of the instrument was established using Split half method. Data collected in respect of the research questions were analyzed using mean of scores while t-test was used to test the null hypotheses. The results revealed that the respondents were moderately aware of the educational benefits of Web 2.0 technologies and adopted Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes to a very low extent. The result also revealed that age was a critical factor in business educators’ rating of awareness and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for instructional purposes while gender, sex, years of experience in teaching and type of institution did not affect the respondents’ ratings. It was recommended, among others, that business educators should be abreast of all emerging technologies and be attuned to the contemporary methods and applications of web technologies in the instructional process.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



business educators, web 2.0, instructional purposes


Ahmed, A. K. (2013). Teacher-centered versus learner centered teaching style. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9 (1), 22-34.

Ajise, B. & Fagbola, O. O (2013). Awareness and usage of Web 2.0 tools among lecturers in Nigeria universities: Implications for teaching and learning in schools. Nigerian School Library Journal, 12, 93-107.

Anunobi, C. & Ogbonna, A. (2012). Web 2.0 use by librarians in a state in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 2(5), 7-66.

Baker, J. H. (2003). The learning log. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(1), 11-13.

Baker, S.C., Wentz, R.K., & Woods, M.M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59-64. doi: 10.1080/00986280802529079.

Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘Media Richness Theory’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 9(1), 1-22.

Baxter, G. J., Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M. H., Tsvetkova, N., & Stoimenova, B. (2011). Introducing Web 2.0 in Education: A Structured Approach Adopting a Web 2.0 Implementation Framework. Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP), 499-504.

Collins, E., & Hide, B. (2010). Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers. Retrieved from

Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C.,…Sharples, M. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tension. Becta Leading Next Generation Learning Research Reports, 1-72.

Di Napoli, R. (2004). What is student centered learning. Educational Initiative Centre (EIC) Guide. Retrieved from

Echeng, R., Usoro, A., & Majewski, G. (2013). Acceptance of Web 2.0 in learning in higher education. A case study, Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(10), 146-151.

Elloitt, B. (2008). Assessment 2.0: modernizing assessment in the age of Web 2.0. Glasgow: Scottish Qualification Authority

Ementa, C. N. & Ile, C. M. (2016). Business educators’ awareness and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for educational instruction in tertiary institutions in south east Nigeria. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(1), 216-224. doi: 10.5430/irhe.v1n1p216

Enonbun, O. (2010). Constructivism and Web 2.0 in the emerging learning Era: A global perspective. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 6(4), 17-27.

Fowler, C.J. H., & Mayes, T.J. (2000). Learning relationship from theory to design. In Squires, D., Conole, G., & Jacobs, G. (Eds.), The Changing Face of Learning Technology. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

Harris, A. L., & Lea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact in IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137-144.

Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and Peopl, 18(2), 142-171.doi:10.1108/09593840510601513.

Igberaharha, O. C. (2009). Issues of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Assessment of teaching and learning of business courses. Business Education Journal 2 (1), 95- 105.

Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate web 2.0 in school practice: Towards a framework for pedagogy 2.0. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 29(2), 248-267

Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9 (3), Retrieved from

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking and websites and teens: An Overview. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. Retrieved from

Light, D. & Polin, D. K. (2010). Integrating Web 2.0 tools into the classroom: changing the culture of learning. Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center. Retrieved from

Mamman, J.S. & Nwabufo, B. N. (2014). Barriers to integration of Web 2.0 technologies in teaching/learning of business education courses in Nigerian universities. Business Education Journal 2 (1), 28- 38.

McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 25(3), 309-321.

McGee, J.B., & Begg, M. (2008). What medical educators need to know about ‘Web 2.0’. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 164-169.

Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2009). A causal model of factors influencing faculty use of technology. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 57-70.

Mtega, W.P., Dulle, F. W., Malekani, A. W., & Chailla, A. W. (2014). Awareness and use of Web 2.0 technologies in sharing of agricultural knowledge in Tanzania. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 6 (2), 188-202.

Namgyel, T. (2013). Teacher-centered instructional delivery affecting students’ learning. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 17(2), 60-69.

Nazatul-Aini, A. M. (2014). Integration of Web 2.0 tools in learning a programme course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4), 88-94

Okolocha, C.C, Ile, C.M. & Okolocha, C. B. (2012). Business educator’s familiarity with the utilization of hi-tech tools in the preparation of graduates for modern business/marketing in Nigeria. Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce 3(2), 1-8.

Okpala, P.N. (March, 2014). Professional ethics and innovative practices in education in the 21st century. Keynote address at the 2nd international conference of Faculty of Education, at University Auditorium, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.

O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software? Communications and Strategies, 65, 17-37.

Polka, W. (2001). Facilitating the transition from teacher centered to student centered instruction at the university level via constructivist principles and customized learning plans. Educational Planning 13(3), 55-61.

Ramanau, R., & Geng, F. (2009). Researching the use of wikis to facilitate group work. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 1(1), 2620-2626.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.463.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory of digital age. Retrieved from

Stern, J. (2008). Introduction to Web 2.0 technologies. Retrieved from

Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Vygoysky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Weller, A. (2013). The use of web 2.0 technology for pre-service teacher learning in science education. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 40-46.

Wilclox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the University, it was just the people’: The role of social support in the first year of higher education. Studies in Higher Education 30 (6), 707-722

Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G, & Yuen, P.K. (2011). Perceptions, interests and use: Teachers and Web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 7(2), 109-123.

Zohrabi, M; Torabi, M. A. & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (3), 18-30. doi:10.5539/ells.v2n3p18



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Christiana Ngozi Ementa, Chika Madu Ile

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).