INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN MODEL IN ORDER TO THE STEM EDUCATION FOR DEVELOPING STUDENT'S ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE IN CHEMISTRY SUBJECT ON THE RATE OF CHEMICAL REACTION ISSUE OF SECONDARY STUDENTS AT THE 11TH GRADE LEVEL
Abstract
The aims of this research were to develop an innovative instructional lesson plan based on the model of the STEM Education instructional designing model (STEM Model) with the effectiveness of processing and performance resulting outcomes to be effective (E1/E2) according to the criteria level of 70/70, to compare between students’ academic achievements of their pretest and posttest assessments with the STEM Model, to compare between students’ academic achievement of their posttest assessment and their standardized criterion of 70% threshold, to assess students’ perceptions of their attitudes toward science after the STEM Model were administered, and to analyze the associations between students’ academic achievements and their attitudes toward science after the STEM Model were administered, completely. The sample target group consisted of 22 secondary students at the 11th grade level in chemistry class from Mahawichanukul School under the Maha Sarakham Secondary Educational Service Area Office 26 with the purposive sampling technique was selected. Research instruments were composed of an innovative instructional lesson plan based on the concept of the STEM Model on the Rate of Chemical Reaction Issue was administered for a total of 16 hours in six weeks, which was reviewed by the 5-professional experts was very high appropriate, the 30-item Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) was assessed, and students’ perceptions were assessed and adapted from the original of the 70-item Test Of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA) to the 21-item Science Attitude Assessment Model (SAAM). Statistically significant was analyzed with mean, percentage, standard deviation and testing the hypothesis with the Pearson’s correlation was used. The results of these research findings that following as: an innovative instructional lesson plan based on the model of the STEM Model with the effectiveness of processing and performance resulting outcomes to be effective (E1/E2) evidence of 78.41/74.24, which according to the criteria level at 70/70. The average means scores of students’ academic achievements of their posttest ( = 22.27, S.D. = 3.18) was a higher than pretest ( = 10.86, S.D. = 2.57) outcomes, statistically significant was differentiated between their pretest and posttest designs at the level of .05. Comparisons between students’ academic achievement of their CAT was a higher than standardized criterion of 70% threshold with the STEM Model, statistically significant was differentiated between their posttest designs and the criterion of 70% threshold at the level of .05, differently. Assessing students’ perceptions of their SAAM to the STEM Model indicated that of a high level and Cronbach alpha coefficient value was 0.88, validity. Associations between students’ academic achievements and their attitudes toward science after using the STEM Model, the predictive efficiency (R2) value indicated that 86% of the variances in the CAT to their chemistry class were attributable to their SAAM, relatively.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Carlson, L. E., and Sullivan, J. F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1) 20–31.
Carr-Chellman A. and Duchastel P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3): pp. 229–241, July 2000.
Clark, W. B. (2009). The history of instructional design and technology. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/benton44/history-of-instructional-design-and-technology?from=embed
Conole G., and Fill K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2005 (08).
English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3): pp. 1–8.
Esseff, P. J. and Esseff, M. S. (1998). Instructional development learning system (IDLS). (8th ed.). ESF Press: pp. 1–12.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA: Test of science-related attitudes handbook. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farra, Straus, and Giroux.
Klopfer, L.E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B.S. Bloom, J.T. Hastings, and G.F. Madaus (Eds), Handbook on Summative and formative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Koper, R. (2006). Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1): pp. 13–22.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., and Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84 (4): pp. 405–412.
Merino, D. C., & López, E. S. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Retrieved on 2014/1/31 from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&citation_:2osOgNQ5qMEC
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., and Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design (PDF). Educational Technology. 36 (5): pp. 5–7.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Basic education curriculum core B.E.2551 (A.D. 2008). Retrieved from http://www.skn.ac.th/kan2551.htm
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. ETR&D, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2001: pp. 57–67.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Boston: Pearson.
Santiboon, T. & Fisher D. L. (2005). Learning environments and teacher-student interactions in science classes in Thailand. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Sustainable Communities and Sustainable Environments: Envisioning a Role for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Victoria, Vancouver, Canada.
Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45(November 2015): pp. 42–53.
von Stumm, S., Hell, B., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity in the third pillar of academic performance. Perspective on Psychological Science. 6 (6): pp. 574–588.
Ward, A., Stoker, H. W., and Murray-Ward, M. (1996). Achievement and ability tests - definition of the domain. Educational Measurement, 2. University Press of America: pp. 2–5.
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2012). Bloom's Taxonomy. Retrieved from Wikipedia on April 18, 2012 at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy
Ziedner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: New York: Plenum Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.707
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Tiptunya Duangsri, Panwilai Chomchid, Janpen Phusopha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
