Fred Wafula Namasaka, Helen Omondi Mondoh, Chrilukovian B. Wasike


Despite the importance of knowledge in Biology, candidates’ performance at the national examination, The Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) is poor. This could be attributed to the teaching methods. The purpose of this study was to compare differential effectiveness of Sequential Teaching Methods (STM) on the, retention of knowledge in Biology by secondary school students. The study was Quasi- experimental using the Non-equivalent control- group 16 study design. The target population comprised students in the 18 old category National Schools in Kenya that were in existence before 2012. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a sample of eight (8) schools and 402 Students. The students in the eight (8) sub-groups were taught the same Biology topic: “General Characteristics of Enzymes”, using different sequences of three teaching methods namely: lecture, slide demonstration and laboratory (student experiment). Group I (ELD) began with experiments, followed by lecture method and was lastly shown, animated slides. The sequence of the three different methods used in the first group was altered in both the second and third groups as follows: The lecture method, slide demonstration and laboratory experiment (LDE) for Group II, and slide demonstration, experiment and lecture method (DEL) for group III. Students in group IV (control group) were taught using (oral-only) lecture method. The teachers gave lectures and performed slide demonstration   while the students carried out laboratory experiments. The test was used as a pre-test and also as a retention test that was administered 40 days after the Post-test BAT. This test had 25 objective questions testing knowledge of facts, application of knowledge and problem solving ability. To measure Retention of Knowledge, the researcher used Biology Retention Test (BRT). The research hypothesis was tested using ANOVA at significant level of 0.05. The results and findings of the study show that STM, when efficiently used in instruction, enhance immediate retention of knowledge in Biology more effectively than the oratory lecture method predominantly used in Kenyan Secondary schools. Furthermore, DEL sequence was identified as the most effective in comparison to LDE and ELD. The findings of the study will help curriculum developers and teachers to choose the most appropriate sequence to use in Biology.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



sequential teaching, retention of knowledge, secondary school, Kenya


Aziz, T. (1990). Comparative Effectiveness of Information processing models of Teaching in developing certain concepts in Chemistry at Secondary stage, PhD Dessertation, Jamin Millia Islamia.

Bahrick, H.P. (1984). Semantic memory content in the permastore: Fifty years of memory forSpanish learned in school. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 104, 54-75.

Brown, C. (1995). The Effective Teaching in Biology. New York: Longhorn Group Limited. Chammy, K (2006) Science and Social Justice: Making the Case for Case Studies J. Coll Sci. Teach. 36, 54-59.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods Approaches (3rd Edition). New Delhi: Sage publications India PVT Ltd)

Damico, S., B. & Roth, J. (1994). Differences between the Learning Environments of High and Low Graduation Schools: Listening to General Track Students. A paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Esra, O., Ijlal, O., & Ocak, G. (2009). Sequential Teaching methods in Biology and their effects in Academic Achievement. Kuramsal. Ataturk University.

Fowler, W. (1995). School Size and Student Outcomes. Advances in Educational Productivity, 5,3-26

Johnson, H. (1991). The Relative Effectiveness and Efficiency of Hands- On, Slide Demonstration and Videotape Laboratories for Non-Science Major Students. 111p. Master’s Thesis, Hinton State University.

Kenya Institute of Education (2006). Secondary Education Syllabus, Nairobi: KLB.

Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) (2006). Year 2005 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Examination Candidates Performance Report. Nairobi: Self.

Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) (2007). Year 2006 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Examination Candidates Performance Report. Nairobi: Self.

Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) (2008). Year 2007 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Examination Candidates Performance Report. Nairobi: Self.

Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) (2012). Year 2011 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Examination Candidates Performance Report. Nairobi: Self.

Kibett, J. K., & Kathuri, N. J. (2005). Effects of Project-Based Learning on Students Performance in Secondary Schools Agriculture. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 17(1) 30-38.

Killermann, W. (1998). Research into Biology Teaching Methods. Journal of Biological Education. 33(1): 4-9.

Lawson, A. E. (2001) “Using the learning cycle to teach Biology Concepts and Reasoning Patterns”. Journal of Biological Education, 35 (4), 165-169.

Maundu. J. N.; Sambili. H. J; and Muthwii S. M (1998). Biology Education: A methodological approach. AMU Press, Nakuru

Mills, H. R. (1991). Teaching and training. A handbook for instructors (3rd ed). London: Macmillan Publishers.

Ministry of Education (2006). The 2006 -2011 Strategic Plan. Nairobi

Mondoh, H. O. (2005). Methods of Teaching Mathematics: A handbook for teachers and students. Njoro: Egerton University Press.

Namasaka, F. W., Mondoh, H. O., & Kerero, F. N. (2013b,). Effects of concept and vee mapping strategy on students’ Achievement in Biology in secondary schools in Uasin-Gishu District, Kenya. International Journal of Current Research in life sciences, Vol, No. 7, pp. 016-022.

Nassiuma, D. K. & Mwangi, J. W. (2004). Statistical methods for Information Analysis: An Introduction. Egerton University Press.

Njuguna, B. M. (1999). The Findings from Baseline Studies by SMASSE Project. SMASSE project.

O’Day, D. H. (2009). FAMIS animations as teaching tools and laboratory exercises: Their value and how to make. Pages 338-348, in tested studies for laboratory teaching, volume 30 (K. L. Clase, Editor). Proceedings of the 30th workshop conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE).

Odubunmi, O. & Balogun, T. A. (1991). The effect of laboratory and oral-only lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science. Journal of research in science Teaching 28(3): 213-234.

Opara, A. O. (2011). Labwork and student Academic Achievement in Biology. Lessons and policy implementation. American-Eurasian Journal of scientific research 6(1): 28-31.

Orora, W., Wachanga, S. W. & Keraro, F.N. (2005). Effects of Concept Mapping Teaching Approach on Secondary School Students

Achievement in Biology in Gucha District Kenya. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 1-18.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The Elaboration Theory. Guidance for Scope and Sequences Decisions. In R. M. Reigeluth, (Ed), Instructional – Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume 11, pp 425-454. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Evlbaum Associates.

Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2011). Research Methods for Business. A Skill Building Approach. Dheli: Aggarwal Printing Press.

Sisson, J., Swortz, R., & Wolf, F. (1992). Learning, retention and recall of clinical information. Med educ. 26 (6):454-61.

SMASSE Project, (2007). Statistical Analysis on SMASSE Project Impact Assessment Survey, JICA, Tokyo, Japan.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction; 4, 295-312”

Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting Junior High School students in Biology. Science Education, Int. 77(1):Pp 31-48.

Wachanga, S. W., & Mwangi, J. G. (2004). Effects of Cooperative class Experiment Teaching Method on secondary school students’ chemistry Achievement in Kenya’s Nakuru District. International Educational Journal, 5(1), 26-36.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.723


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Fred Wafula Namasaka, Helen Omondi Mondoh, Chrilukovian B. Wasike

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).