SITUATED KNOWLEDGE OF LANGUAGE TEACHING IN AN EFL CONTEXT
Abstract
Theory-first approaches to language teaching research assume that teaching is directed by factors internal to the teachers, i.e., teacher cognition since they weed out contextual constraints as irrelevant. As a result, practitioners enter the profession with little or no knowledge of the culturally valued modes of thought and action. To uncover contextual constraints or context-sensitive parameters, this study collected and analysed interview data through grounded theory procedures. The results show that rather than being directed by generally accepted principles of language teaching, teachers' action is directed by teachers' awareness of parameters, "a set of culturally permissible, though theoretically unjustified acts specified through local exams and teacher evaluation and promotion schemes". To improve practice, teacher education programs should not only develop teachers' conceptual knowledge but also equip them with a critical awareness of contextual constraints, i.e., the parameters of teaching which account for the situated nature of teaching knowledge.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Bartels, N. (2003). How teachers and researchers read academic articles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(7), 737-753.
Bartels, N. (2004). Linguistics imperialism. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 128-133.
Becher, T. & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories (2nd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Borg, S. (2003b). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: A literature review. Language Awareness, 12(2), 96-108).
Bruer, J. (1994). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brumfit, C. (1995). Teacher professionalism and research. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 27-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carless, D. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485-500.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639-662.
Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1-26). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cook, L., Smagorinsky, P., Fry, P., Konopak, B., & Moore, C. (2002). Problems in developing a constructivist approach to teaching: One teacher’s transition from teacher preparation to teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 389-413.
Dulany, D., Carlson, R., & Dewey, G. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
Eraut, M. (2000a). The intuitive practitioner: A critical overview. In T. Atkinson & G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, L. & Snow, C. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. Adger, C. Snow, & D. Christian, (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language. Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Centre for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co., Inc.
Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualising the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417.
Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. (2004). Common misconceptions about the quiet revolution. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 119-127.
Furlong, J. (2000). Intuition and the crisis in teacher professionalism. In T. Atkinson & G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Mill valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Graff, P., Squire, L., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 164-78.
Hawkins, M. & Irujo, S. (2004). Collaborative conversations among language teacher educators. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Johnson, K. (1992a). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1), 83-108.
Johnson, K. (1996b). Cognitive apprenticeship in second language teacher education. In G. Tinker-Sachs, M. Brock, & R. Lo (Eds.), Directions in second language teacher education. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Hedgcock, J. (2002). Toward a socioliterate approach to second language teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 86, 299-317.
Korthagen, F. & Lagerwerf, B. (1996). Reframing the relationship between teacher thinking and teacher behaviour: Levels in learning about teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 161-190.
Kagan, D. (1992b). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 63(2),129-169.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1990). On the need for a theory of language teaching. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Lo, Y. (2005). Knowledge of SLA and cultural context. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied
linguistics in language teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mackey, W. (1966). Applied linguistics: Its meaning and use. English Language Teaching, 20(1), 197-206.
Myhill, D. (2003). Principled understanding? Teaching the active and passive voice. Language and Education, 17(5), 355-370.
Nathan, M. & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905-928.
Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers' beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177-195.
Richards, J., Tung, P., & Ng, P. (1992). The culture of the English language teacher: A Hong Kong example. RELC Journal, 23(1), 81-102.
Riley, R. (1996). Revealing socially constructed knowledge through quasi-structured interviews and grounded theory analysis. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 15(2), 21-40.
Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. English Language Teaching Journal, 58(2), 155-163.
Savova, L. (2003). Grammar conversations: Educating teachers about grammar discourses. In D. Liu & P. Master (Eds.), Grammar teaching in teacher education. Arlington, VA: TESOL.
Schultz, A. (1971). The stranger: An essay in psychology. In A. Broderson (Ed.), Alfred Schultz: Collected Papers: vol.2. Studies in social theory (pp.91-105). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schwandt, T. A. (1999). On understanding. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 451-464.
Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34(3), 187-213.
Smith, D. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tomlinson, P. (1999a). Conscious reflection and implicit learning in teacher preparation: Part I: Recent light on an old issue. Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 405-424.
Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xiao, Y. (2005). Raising the orthographic awareness of teachers of Chinese. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics in language teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v0i0.261
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.
All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).