TEACH US THE WAY WE WANT: TEACHING APPROACH FOR SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS

Ariel E. San Jose, Rida Bahket, Hanaa Hassan Ali Alsalhi

Abstract


This study was conducted to explore the learning of special needs students in reading and writing; determine their preferred teaching approaches; and obtain their suggestions to improve the teaching of both reading and writing modules. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted in obtaining pertinent information. Results regarding what the learners learned; and the best approach for teaching English revealed interesting insights which could guide special needs teachers. Suggestions which aimed at improving English teaching were also provided.   

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


teaching approach, special needs, deaf and mute

References


Bay Jr, B. E. (2013). Integration of technology-driven teaching strategies for enhancing Photojournalism Course. Educational Research International, 2 (2), 155-164.

Camacho, D. J., & Legare, J. M. (2015). Opportunities to Create Active Learning Techniques in the Classroom. Journal of Instructional Research, 4, 38-45.

Center to Teaching Learning (2014). Effective teaching strategies.[Online] Available: http://www.fau.edu/ctl/EffectiveTeachingStrategies.php [October 15, 2017]

Cobb, A. K., & Forbes, S. (2002). Qualitative research: what does it have to offer to the gerontologist?. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(4), M197-M202.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing from five traditions. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Gage, N. L. (1984). What do we know about teaching effectiveness?. The Phi Delta Kappan, 66(2), 87-93.

Heald-Taylor, G. (1989). Whole language strategies for ESL students. San Diego, CA: Dormac.

Hoferková, R. (2012). Deaf students learning English as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta).

Knutson, S. (2014). Teaching strategies used by effective teachers. [Online] Available: http://www.homepages.dsu.edu/molstadl/SDBEA/vars02/article7.htm [October 8, 2017]

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalist inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Routledge.

Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of educational psychology, 82(4), 715.

Meux, M., & Smith, B. O. (1964). Logical dimensions of teaching behavior. Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness, 127-164.

Mulligan, E. (2011). What works: Effective teaching strategies for students with disabilities.

[Online] Available: http://nichcy.org/what-works-effective-teaching-strategies-for-students-with-disabilities, [October 16, 2017]

Munhall, P. L. (2007). A phenomenological method. PL Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective, 4, 145-210.

Power, D., & Leigh, G. R. (2000). Principles and practices of literacy development for deaf learners: A historical overview. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 3-8.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Rasmussen, J. L. (2015). Pedagogical reasoning of pre-service teachers: Juggling priorities and managing resources.

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.). (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Rossman, R. B., & Ralllis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

San Jose, A. and Galal, M. (2016). Silent learners’ cognition: A content analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), (4)12, 43-56. Retrieved from http://www.journalijar.com/article/13486/silent-learners%E2%80%99-language-cognition:-a-content-analysis. on October 12, 2017.

San Jose, A. E. & Galang, J. G. (2015) Strategies in teaching literature: Students in focus. International Journal of Education and Research. (3) 4. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/April-2015/05.pdf on October 16, 2017.

Saint Joseph’s University (2017). Teaching techniques for students with a hearing loss. Retrieved from http://online.sju.edu/graduate/masters-special-education/resources/articles/modern-teaching-techniques-for-deaf-students on October 11, 2017.

Scientific American (2017). Communication with and between deaf mutes. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/communication-with-and-between-deaf, on October 13, 2017.

Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermenutics, and social construction. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research, p. 189-213. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.

Shepard, R. N., & Cooper. L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research method knowledge base.[Online] Available: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualval.php, [October 2, 2017].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.1206

Copyright © 2015. European Journal of Special Education Research (ISSN 2501 - 2428) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).