MINIMALIST THEORY OF FICTION AND THE ICTHINKING® METHOD AS A BACKGROUND FOR NEW INSIGHTS TO AUTISM

Crister Nyberg, Amanda Ptolomey

Abstract


The standard approach to conceptual understanding in the case of autism uses the distinction of abstract versus concrete thinking. This approach has its benefits but fails to explain all features of language use. For example, some concepts change their meaning in different contexts in contrast to concepts that are more rigid in their uses, such as mathematical concepts. This idea has its background in Minimalist theory of fiction (MTF), a theory that considers ‘skills to use words’ essential for understanding fiction, contrasting with theories that require pretending or make believe to understand fiction. From this background, the theory of Integrative Complexity (IC), and the method animating for practice, ICthinking®, can be of particular use to autistic people. The interventions develop meta-cognitive skills and are supportive of autistic people. From these starting points, we introduce new research hypotheses for developing educational methods especially for autistic people.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


autism, integrative complexity, metacognition, fiction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative research, 9(5), pp.547-570.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37-46

Berk, L. E. (2003). Child development. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Botha, M., Hanlon, J. and Williams, G.L., 2021. Does language matter? Identity-first versus person-first language use in autism research: A response to Vivanti. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, pp.1-9.

Boyd-MacMillan, E. (2016). Increasing Cognitive Complexity and Collaboration Across Communities: Being Muslim Being Scottish. Journal of Strategic Security (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.4.1563

Boyd-MacMillan, E., Fearon, P., Ptolomey, A., & Mathieson, L. (2016). I SEE! Scotland: Tackling Sectarianism and Promoting Community Psychosocial Health. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.4.1556

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Conway III, L. G., Thoemmes, F., Allison, A. M., Towgood, K. H., Wagner, M. J., Davey, K., Salcido, A., Stovall, A. N., Dodds, D. P., Bongard, K. and Conway, K. R. (2008). Two ways to be complex and why they matter: Implications for attitude strength and lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), p.1029.

Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264.

Evans, G. (1982). The Varietes of Reference. New York: Oxford University Press Field

Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Assoc.

Frege, G. (1892). ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50. Translated as ‘On Sense and Reference’ by M. Black in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds. and trans.), Oxford: Blackwell, third edition, 1980.

Garvey, C. (1990). Play (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Goldman, A. I. (1989). Interpretation psychologized. Mind and Language, 4, 161-185.

Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language, 1, 158-171.

Gordon, R. M. (1992). The simulation theory: Objections and misconceptions. Mind and Language, 7, 11-34.

Happé, F. (1995). Understanding Minds and Metaphors: Insights from the Study of Figurative Language in Autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10:4, 275-295

Hickman, R. (2007). Visual art as a vehicle for educational research. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 26(3), pp.314-324.

Horwich, P. 1998. Truth. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Horwich, P. 1998b. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jarrold, C., Carruthers, P., Smith, P. K., & Boucher, J. (1994). Pretend play: Is it metarepresentational? Mind and Language, 9, 445 – 468

Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C. and Pellicano, E. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), pp.442-462.

Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: the origins of "theory of mind". Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.

Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1988). Autistic children's understanding of seeing, knowing and believing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 315-324.

Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development, 64, 348–371.

Mannay, D., Staples, E. and Edwards, V. (2017). Visual methodologies, sand and psychoanalysis: employing creative participatory techniques to explore the educational experiences of mature students and children in care. Visual Studies, 32(4), pp.345-358.

Meinong, A. (1905). “Über Gegestandstheorie”, in Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, A. Meinong, ed., Leipzig: Barth; English translation, “On the Theory of Objects,” in Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, R. Chisholm (ed.), Glencoe: The Free Press, 1960

Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Sarah R. Pripas-Kapit (2012). Who's Missing the Point? A Commentary on Claims that Autistic Persons Have a Specific Deficit in Figurative Language Comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 27:1, 93-105

Nyberg, C. (2015). Fiction in Drama Education Offers Learning Opportunities for All, Philosophical Perspectives in Drama Education. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences. EJSBS Volume XII (eISSN: 2301-2218)

Nyberg, C. (2016). Fiction, Truth and Reference. Minimalist Theory of Fiction. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed), From Philosophy of Fiction to Cognitive Poetics. Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Volume 4. Peter Lang Edition.

Nyberg, C. (2018). Truth in Fiction Reconsidered. In S. H. Klausen (Ed), Res Cogitans. Vol 13, No 1. Frontiers in the philosophy of literature.

Nyberg, C. (2018). Philosophical Background of Integrative Complexity. To be submitted.

Parsons T. (1980). Nonexistent objects. New Haven/London: Yale University Press 1980.

Parsons T. (2000). Indeterminate Identity: metaphysics and semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Randell, A & Nielsen, M. (2007). Children's Communication of Pretend Acts Using Social Cues, In M. A. Vanchevsky (Ed), Frontiers in Cognitive Psychology, Nova Science Publishers

Russell, B., (1905). ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14 (October): 479-493

Still, J. & Worton M. (1991). “Introduction.” Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Ed. Judith Still and Michael Worton. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991.

Suedfeld, P., & Rank, A. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169-178.

Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 169-184.

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Ramirez, C. (1977). War, peace, and integrative complexity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 427-442.

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393-400). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor & Francis Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a `theory of mind'? Cognition, 21, 37±46.

Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge, Harvard University Press

Wittgenstein, L. (1999). [1963] Filosofisia tutkimuksia. Transl. By Heikki Nyman. Porvoo: WSOY. (originally Philosophische Untersuchungen 1953)

Zalta, E., (1983). Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v7i1.3598

Copyright © 2015. European Journal of Special Education Research (ISSN 2501 - 2428) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).