İhsan Marulcu, Kıvanç Bozkuş


The purpose of this research is to adapt The Teacher Effectiveness Scale in Higher Education into Turkish language. The survey method was employed. Collected data were analyzed using confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. The adapted scale had 32 items and 4 factors explaining 50.3% variance. Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients of the factors varied from α=0.70 to α=0.89 and factor loadings of the items ranged from 0.47 to 0.80. Statistically significant correlations among factors ranging from r=0.54 to r=0.58 were found. It is concluded that the adapted scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure teaching-related behavior, subject matter expertise, relational expertise, and personality aspects of teacher effectiveness in higher education.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



higher education, teacher effectiveness, scale, adaptation


Başar, H. (2000). Eğitim denetçisi (5th edition). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem.

Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2011). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış (16th edition). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem.

Calaguas, G. M. (2013). Teacher effectiveness scale in higher education: Development and psychometric properties. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2(2), 3-20.

Casey, R. J., Gentile, P., & Bigger, S. W. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective. Higher Education, 34(4), 459-482.

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (3rd edition). Ankara: Pegem.

Dresel, M., & Rindermann, H. (2011). Counseling university instructors based on student evaluations of their teaching effectiveness: A multilevel test of its effectiveness under consideration of bias and unfairness variables. Research in Higher Education, 52(7), 717-737.

Ergün, M. (2001). Üniversitelerde öğretim etkililiğinin geliştirilmesi. 2000 Yılında Türk Milli Eğitim Örgütü ve Yönetimi Ulusal Sempozyumu (p. 188-192). Ankara: Öğretmen Hüseyin Hüsnü Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı.

Feldman, K. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart, The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective (p. 93-130). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington: National Comprehension Center for Teacher Quality.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Karkoulian, S. K. (2002). Performance appraisal in higher education. UK: University of Leicester.

Marsall, K. (2012). Fine-tuning teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 50-53.

Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 707-754.

Maslow, v., & Kelley, C. (2012). Does evaluation advance teaching practice? The effects of performance evaluation on teaching quality and system change in large diverse high schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22(3), 600-632.

Melnic, A. S. (2011). Evaluation in education - A formative approach in measuring the performances of academics. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 14(1), 168-175.

Mercer, J., Barker, B., & Bird, R. (2010). Human resource management in education contexts, themes and impact. New York, USA: Routledge.

Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 138-149.

Patrick, J., & Smart, R. M. (1998). An empirical evaluation of teacher effectiveness: The emergence of three critical factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2) 165-178.

Tucker, P. D., & Stronge, J. H. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Danvers, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2) 191-211.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 İhsan Marulcu, Kıvanç Bozkuş

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).