Isil Koc


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the inquiry-based science methods course on preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Eighty-six preservice elementary education majors enrolled in the elementary science methods course participated in the study. Data were collected through Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument- Form B (STEBI-B), a participant information form, and semi-structured interviews. Findings from the quantitative data revealed that there was significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores on both the Personal Science Teaching Efficacy (PSTE) and Science Teaching Outcome Expectancy (STOE), which are two subscales of STEBI-B. The qualitative findings of the study were utilized to further clarify the quantitative results. Overall, findings from the study indicated a positive relationship between participating in the elementary science methods course and changes in science teaching self- efficacy beliefs.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



teacher efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs; preservice elementary teachers; science teaching; teacher education


Arambula-Greenfield, T., & Feldman, A. (1997). Improving science teaching for all students. School Science and Mathematics, 97(7), 377-386.

Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.

Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Teacher efficacy attitudes, classroom behaviour, and maintaining professional self-esteem. In P. Ashton, & R. Webb (eds.) Making a difference: Teacher’s sense of efficacy and student achievement, (pp-55-89), New York, NY: Longman Inc.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company.

Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 205-225.

Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. D. (2003). Factors affecting the science teaching efficacy of preservice teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education 14(3), 177-192.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Czerniak, C. M. (1989). An investigation of the relationships among science teaching anxiety, self-efficacy, teacher education variables, and instructional strategies. Dissertation Abstract International.

Czerniak, C. M., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49-58.

Czerniak, C. M., & Shriver, M. L. (1994). An examination of preservice science teachers’ beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher

Education, 5(3), 77-86.

Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 173-184.

Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal S., Young, B., Jones, D., & Sutton, A. (2004). Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. London: Health Development Agency.

Enochs, L., & Riggs, I. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8) 694-706.

Enochs, L. G., Scharmann, L. C., & Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79(1), 63-75.

Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.

Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1999). Beginning elementary school teachers and the effective teaching of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4) 287-313.

Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene and V. J. Caracelli (eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms, (pp. 5-17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Hammersley, M. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In J. T. E. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences, (pp. 159-174), Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society Books.

Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 47-57.

Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. G. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(1), 26-34.

Riggs, I. M. (1995). The characteristics of high and low efficacy elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

Ritter, J. M., Boone, W. J., & Rubba, P. A. (2001). An extension analysis on the self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching and learning instrument for prospective elementary teachers. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers. Costa Mesa, CA 18-21, Jan. 2001(

Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65.

Wingfield, M. E., Freeman, L., & Ramsey, J. (2000). Science teaching self-efficacy of first year elementary teachers trained in a site based program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teacher’s sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Isil Koc

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).