Michael Vitoulis


This research detects the potential of the creative practice of brainstorming to change the attitudes of future pedagogues regarding the exploitation of new technologies in the early childhood education and care. The survey involved 111 future educators who were divided into two groups of 54 and 57 respectively. Both groups attended an equivalent training program on the use of new technologies in pre-school education. In the first group, the experimental one, the intervention which was implemented exploited an experiential creative practice. The issue of intervention is about IoT (Internet of Things) as it is a trend that is consistent with the concepts of innovation and creativity. The same subject was taught to the second group, the control group, but with traditional teaching practices. In both groups, the same questionnaire of views and attitudes was applied, both before and after completion of the course. The results showed that the experimental group changed its attitude towards new technologies to a greater extent than in the control group. According to the findings of the research, the educators' active participation in creative practice helped them change their attitudes towards the use of technology in pre-school education.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



creativity, IoT, early childhood education, digital pedagogy, teacher education, attitude change, ICT in education

Full Text:



Afshari, M., K. Kamariah Abu Bakar, W. Su Luan, B. Abu Samah, and F. Say Fooi. 2009. Factors Affecting Teachers’ Use of Information and Communication Technology. International Journal of Instruction, 1, 77–104.

Andersson, P. and Mattsson, L. (2015), “Service innovations enabled by the ‘internet of things’ ”, IMP Journal, 9(1), 85-106.

Andreasen, N.C. (2005). The creating brain: The neuroscience of genius. New York: Dana Press.

Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks., 54, 2787-2805.

Bi, Z., Xu, L.D. and Wang, C. (2014), “Internet of Things for enterprise systems of modern manufacturing”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1537-1546.

Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R. and Maggioni, V. (2013), “Collective knowledge and organizational routines within academic communities of practice: an empirical research on science-entrepreneurs”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 260-227.

Dutton, W. (2014), “Putting things to work: social and policy challenges for the internet of things”, Info, (16)3, 1-21.

Gartner (2014), “Gartner says the IoT will transform the data center”, available at: Retrieved December 7, 2017.

Gaur A, Scotney B, Parr G, McClean S. (2015). Smart City Architecture and its Applications Based on IoT. Procedia Computer Science, 52, 1089-1094.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.

Markkanen, A., & Shey, D. (2014). The intersection of analytics and the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things.

Merrotsy, P. (2013). A note on big-c creativity and little-c creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 474-476.

Peoples, C., Parr, G., Mcclean, S., Scotney, B. and Morrow, P. (2013), “Performance evaluation of green data centre management supporting sustainable growth of the internet of things”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 34, 221-242.

Petty R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.

Petty, R.E., & Briñol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple meta-cognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 137-147.

Rieger, A. (2017). Creativity as a Route to Attitude Change: Can the Creative Process Augment the Effectiveness of a Persuasive Message? Honors Thesis Collection. 478. Retrieved December 4, 2017.

Rouse M. (2014). What is Internet of Things (IoT)? Definition from Retrieved December 10, 2017.

Savenye W., Davidson G., Orr K. (1992). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice teachers’ attitudes and anxiety toward computers, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 3(1), 31-41.

Schon, D.A. (1996). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers and Education, 52(2), 302–312.

Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (127–146). New York: MacMillan.

Turel, O., Mouttapa, M., & Donato, E. (2015). Preventing problematic Internet use through video-based interventions: A theoretical model and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(4), 349-362.

Yan, Z., Zhang, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2014). A survey on trust management for Internet of Tings. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 42, 120–134.

Zaranis, N., & Oikonomidis, V. (2014). The main factors of the attitudes of Greek kindergarten teachers towards information and communication technology. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(4), 1–18.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Vitoulis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).