Salah Abdirahman Farah


Performance appraisal system is lately adopted by most companies and organizations to evaluate individual employee in order to get a clear picture of the specific employee. As much as the organizations have taken up the initiative of developing the tool, questions like is it useful, has it impacted on the productivity of these employees and how effective is it must be answered and well ventilated. The study dwelled and sought to answer the above questions on Teachers Service Commission of Kenya’s performance appraisal system through the teachers it has employed in the public schools in Garissa township sub-county. It was, through this research, found out that the general perception level among teachers towards the tool is positive. Teachers have seen it to be a good idea. It was also found that majority of the respondents were satisfied with the effectiveness of the system. The tool is quite effective in achieving the objective it was developed for. However, respondents were for the opinion that it has no impact on their work productivity. Work productivity depends on other factors including in-service training, motivation, clear mechanisms of promotion including academic qualification etc. it was also found out that the tool is useful but must be updated periodically to cater for various needs. In conclusion, the performance appraisal tool developed by Teachers Service Commission (TSC) called Teachers performance Appraisal and Development (TPAD) got approval from majority of the respondents in terms of its general perception, effectiveness and its usefulness to the teaching fraternity. However to get maximum production from the employees, the employer must also enhance all the factors mentioned by the teachers including clear criteria for promotion in order to achieve its set objectives.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



performance appraisal, productivity, perception, satisfaction

Full Text:



Jordan, J. L and Nasis, D. B. (1992), “Preference for performance appraisal based on method used, type of rater and purpose of evaluation”, Psychological report, 70 963-969.

Amstrong, M. (2003). A handbook of Human Resource management practices (9th edition) Kogan.

Asiago, D and Gathii, A. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of performance appraisal practices in Public secondary schools in Limuru district. International Journal of Education and Research, 2 (4), 1-12.

Larson, R. (1984). Teachers’ performance evaluation: What are the key elements? NASS P. Bulletin, 68 (466), 13-18.

Lunenburg, F. C., and Ornstein, A. C. (2006). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices Vol.13. Cenage Learning.

MacGreal, T. L., (1988). Evaluation for enhancing Instructions: Linking teacher evaluation and staff development. Stronge, J. H. (2010). Teacher Evaluation and school Improvement.

Motswakae, R. J. (1990). A study of strategies for the introduction of a staff development. And appraisal scheme in secondary schools in Scotland and comparison with Comparable development in Botswana. Unpublished Master of Education dissertation. Moray house College.

Mugenda, O. M., and Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Nairobi. Act press.

Muli, R. M. (2011). The impact of Performance Appraisal on secondary school Teachers Professional Development in Kitui West (Kenya): Unpublished Master of Education project. Kenyatta University.

Muriithi J. W., (2013) Issues and challenges relating to performance Appraisal of Quality Assurance and Standards officers: A case of Muranga County. Kenyatta University unpublished project.

Odhiambo, G. O. (2005). Teachers appraisal: The experiences of Kenyan secondary school teachers. Journal of Educational administration, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp 402 – 16.

Republic of Kenya, (1969). The Education Act Cap. 211. Nairobi: Government of Kenya Republic of Kenya (2012). The Teachers Service commission Act, 2012. Nairobi GOK.

Teacher Service Commission (2005). Code of Regulation for teachers (3rd edition). Nairobi. GOK.

Teachers Performance appraisal Report. www.tsc.co.ke, Accessed 11/11/2012.

Teachers Service Commission (1969).TSC. Act. Cap 212. Nairobi: GOK publisher.

Thiry, K. J. (2009). Factors that affect peer raters Accuracy in multi-rater feedback system. Unpublished Doctor of philosophy Dissertation. Capella University.

Timperlay, H. S. (1998). Performance appraisal: Principals‟ perceptiveness and some Implications, Journal of Education Administration, 36(1), 44-58.

Tyson, S. (2006). Essentials of Human Resources Management (5th edition). Burlington: Elsevier.

Wanzare, Z. O. (2002). Rethinking teachers’ evaluation in the third world: Educational Management and Administration, 30 (2), 213 – 229.

Wendy, R. and Boudream, W (2000), Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers. The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development, Quarterly Vol. 1.No. 3.

Werunga, K. S., (2014). Teachers’ perceptions on performance Appraisal feedback in secondary schools within Bungoma East Sub-County, Kenya: Kenyatta University, unpublished project.

Wesley, D. E. (2004). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 58(1), 101-135.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1552


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Salah Abdirahman Farah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).