THE IMPACT OF QUESTIONING AND SEMANTIC MAP IN PRE-READING STAGE ON STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Abstract
Pre-reading activities play an important role in language reading classrooms since they help to activate students’ background knowledge of the topics being taught, which results in improving students’ reading comprehension. Most studies in the literature focus on exploring the effects of individual pre-reading activities such as brainstorming, pre-teaching vocabulary, questioning on students’ performance in doing comprehension tasks. Few studies have been conducted to explore whether one technique is better than the others in activating students’ schemata in reading lessons. The current study investigates the impact of Questioning and Semantic map in Pre-reading stage on EFL gifted high school students’ reading comprehension. The participants were 52 gifted students from two science classes for twelfth graders (they were non gifted English students). They shared the same culture, native language, educational background and age. The data were collected through two reading proficiency tests (pre-test and post-test) and individual interviews. The findings revealed that both Questioning and Semantic map had positive impacts on gifted students’ reading comprehension. Especially, the students who received Semantic treatment had significantly better improvement in their reading skill. The findings shed lights on what can be done to improve EFL students’ reading performance.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajideh, P. (2006). Schema-theory Based Considerations on Pre-reading Activities in ESP Textbooks. The Asian EFL Journal, (16).
Al-Issa, A. (2006). Schema theory and L2 reading comprehension: Implications for teaching. Retrieved on April 24th, 2009 from
www.cluteinstitute-onlinejournals.com/PDFs/2006100.pdf
Alemi, M. & Ebadi, S. (2010). The effects of Pre-reading activities on ESP reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1, (5), 569-577.
An, S. (2013). Schema Theory in Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3, (1), 130-134.
Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A Schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. Handbook of reading research. (255-292). New York: Longman
Armbruster, B.B. (1986). Schema Theory and the Design of Content-Area Textbooks. Educational Psychologist, 21, (4), 253-267.
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osbom, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read (3rd ed.). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Carrell, P.L. (1984). Schema Theory and ESL Reading: Classroom Implication and Application. The Modern Language Journal, 68, (4), 332-341.
Carrell, P.L. (1983). Some Issues in Studying the Role of Schemata, or Background Knowledge, in Second Language Comprehension. TESOL Convention, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 81-90.
Carrell, P.L. (1981a). The role of schemata in L2 comprehension. TESOL Convention. TESOL Convention, Detroit, Michigan.
Carrell, P.L. & Eisterhold, J.C. (1983). Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17, (4), 553-569.
Chen, N.S., Wei, C.W., Wu, K.T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283-291.
Chen, N., Teng, D. C., & Lee, C. (2010). Augmenting Paper-Based Reading Activities with Mobile Technology to Enhance Reading Comprehension. 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education. doi:10.1109/wmute.2010.39.
Chen, N., Teng, D. C., & Lee, C. (2011). Augmenting Paper-Based reading activity with direct access to digital materials and scaffolded questioning. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1705-1715. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.013.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for mind. Jounal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137–149.
Freedman, G., and Reynolds, E.. (1980). Enriching basal reader lessons with semantic webbing. The Reading Teacher, 33, 677-684.
Ge, S., & Land, S.M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
Ge, S., & Land, S.M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22.
Goodman, K. (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 42-45.
Hemlich, J.E. and Pittleman, S.V. (1986). Semantic mapping. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of included schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning 32, (1), 1-31.
Karakas, M. (2006). The effects of Pre-reading activities on ELT Trainee Teachers’ comprehension of short stories. Egitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 1, (1-2), 25-35.
King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307-317.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 338-368.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Y.H. (2012). The effects of Pre-reading activities on Korean high school students’ English Reading Comprehension.
Lee, Y., Kinzie, M. B., & Whittaker, J. V. (2012). Impact of online support for teachers’ open-ended questioning in pre-k science activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2012), 568-577.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 15, (2), 169-181.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16, (4), 503-516.
McDaniel, M.A., & Donnelly, C.M. (1996). Learning with analogy and elaborative interrogation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 508-519.
Mihara, K. (2011). Effects of Pre-reading strategies on EFL/ ESL reading comprehension. TESL Canada Journal. 28, (2).
Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 549–560.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes,18(4), 443-468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008
Rajatanun, P. (2009). Reading for information. Bangkok, Thailand: Thammasat University Bookstore.
Rasheed, H.S.S. (2014). Examining the Effectiveness of Pre-reading Strategies on Saudi EFL College Students’ Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 7, (11).
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (eds). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. (77-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D.E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. (99-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sinatra, R., Stahl-Gemake, J., & Berg, D. (1984). Improving Reading Comprehension of Disabled Readers through Semantic Mapping. The Reading Teacher, 38(1), 22-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20198670
Steffensen, M.S., C. Joag-dev, and R.C. Anderson (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, (1), 10-29.
Stevens. K.C. (1982). Can we improve reading by teaching background information? Journal of Reading, 25, (4), 326-329.
Zhao, X. & Zhu, l. (2012). Schema Theory and College English Reading Teaching. English Language Teaching, 5, (11), 111-116.
Zimmerman, C.B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. Coady and T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 5-19). Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1641
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Tran Thi Thanh Thuy, Phuong Hoang Yen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
