COMPARISON OF KNOWLEDGE LEVELS OF MEIOSIS AND MITOSIS DIVISIONS OF SEVENTH GRADERS WITH MIXED METHODS

Salih Gülen

Abstract


The main aim of this study is to compare the information about meiosis and mitosis divisions of secondary school students with different methods. The mixed method was used in the research. In the mixed method, it is aimed to close the deficiencies in the solution of the research problems with both qualitative and quantitative data. Homogeneous samples were used in the study. In the 2018-2019 academic years, it was conducted with 7th grade students in a public school in Eastern Anatolia. A total of 132 students participated in the study, depending on the volunteerism principle. Matching test was used to collect quantitative data. Qualitative data were collected through a fully structured interview form. The collected data were analyzed with the help of Microsoft Excel program. Descriptive and content analyzes and techniques such as frequency and percentage values were used. According to the findings, the knowledge of meiosis and mitotic divisions was found to be good level. It was determined that most of the students had the right information about meiosis and mitosis and they knew the general characteristics of these divisions. According to these findings of the study, concordant results were obtained by using mixed method with different measuring methods. Suggestions are presented in parallel with these findings.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


science, meiosis and mitosis divisions, knowledge level, mixed method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyürek, E., & Afacan, Ö. (2012). Determining the 8th grade students’ misconceptions in the unit of “cell division” by using roundhouse diagramming. International Journal of Educational Programs and Teaching Studies, 2(3), 47-58.

Arık, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2017). Attitudes of science teachers towards environmental problems and their metaphorical perceptions for environmental pollution. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(3), 1147-1164.

Atılboz, N., G. (2004). Level of understanding of mitosis and meiosis subjects of high school students in 1st grade and their concepts. Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 24 (3), 147-157.

Aydın, G., & Günay Balım, A. (2013). Science and technology course plans and activities based on conceptual change strategies. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(1), 327-337.

Bakırcı, H., Artun, H., Şahin, S. & Sağdıç, M. (2018). Investigation of opinions of seventh grade students about socio-scientific issues by means of science teaching based on common knowledge construction model. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(2), 207-237. DOI:10.14689/issn.2148 - 2624.1.6c2s10m

Baran, Ş., Doğan, S., & Yalçın, M. (2002). The levels of university biology students making connection between the knowledge gained during their educations and daily life. Journal of Erzincan Faculty of Education, 4(1), 89-96.

Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gedik, Ş. (2014). Comparison of public and private school principals’ instructional leadership skills: mixed-method approach. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20(4), 453-482.

Bora, N. D., Çakıroğlu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Teaching the nervous system with roundhouse diagram. Education and Science, 31(141), 32-39

Brillouin, L. (2013). Science and information theory: Second edition. New York: Academic press.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Çaycı, B. (2007). Investigation of the effect of concept change texts on concept learning. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 27 (1), 87-102.

Çepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project work. Trabzon: Celepler Printing.

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative research methods (Trans. Ed.: Whole, M., & Demir, S.B.). Ankara: Political Publications Distribution.

Creswell, J.W. (2017). Introduction to mixed method research (Trans. Ed.: Sözbilir, M) Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publications.

Daşdemir, İ., Doymuş, K. (2012). The effect of using animation in science and technology course on students' academic achievements, information retention and scientific process skills. Pegem Journal of Education and Training, 2 (3), 33-42.

Demiral, Ü., & Türkmenoğlu, H. (2018). The relationship of preserves science teachers’ decision making strategies and content knowledge in socio-scientific issues. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (1), 309-340. DOI: 10.19171/uefad.450141

Demiral, Ü., & Türkmenoğlu, H. (2018). The relationship of preserves science teachers’ decision making strategies and content knowledge in socio-scientific issues. Journal of Education Faculty, 31 (1), 309-340

Demirci, F. (2017). Science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about astronomy subjects teaching: a mixed method research. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Ordu, Institute for Graduate Studies in Science and Technology, Ordu

Demirkis, N., Ertas, A., & Gülen, S. (2018), Microbiological concepts to teach the development of the course material course. Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 19(3), 2561-2572. DOI: 10.29299 / kefad.2018.19.03.021

Demirkuş, N. (2019). Important concepts in biology. http://www.biyolojiegitim.yyu.edu.tr/ders/kav.htm Accessed on 12.02.2019

Doğru, M., & Kıyıcı, F.B. (ed) (2005). Obligation of science education. teaching science and technology in primary education. Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Emre, İ., & Bahşi, M. (2006). Science student teachers' conceptions about cell division. Eastern Anatolia Region Surveys. 4(3), 70-73.

Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A., & Kaptan, F. (2018). Contribution of socio-political status-based teaching approach to development of argumentation skills: A Mixed-Method Study. Ondokuzmayis University Journal of Education. 37(1), p39-61.

Glesne, C. (2013). Introduction to qualitative research (Trans. Ed.: Ersoy, A., & Yalcinoglu, P.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Güven, İ. (2014). Examination of information literacy and media literacy levels of science and technology teacher candidates. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 787- 800

Kalman, M., & Summak, M. (2016). A mixed methods study on developing teachers’ psychological capital. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 27-58. DOI: 10.21547/jss.256733

Kandemir, M. A. (2015). Examining reflective thinking tendency levels of primary school mathematics and classroom teacher candidates according to some variables. Education Sciences, 10 (4), 253-275.

Kocaman-Karoğlu, A. (2015). Mixed method research analysis in the field of instructional technology: 2005-2015. Ahi Evran Ünv. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 16 (2), 353-369.

Merriam, S. B. (2013). A guide for qualitative research design and implementation (Trans. Ed .: Turan, S.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2018). Elementary and Secondary School 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades science curriculum. Ankara: MoNE publications

Özdemir, Ö. (2006). The effect of instruction ‘the life event which enables continuity of species (reproduction)’ subject through worksheets on primary school eighth grade students’ achievement and retention. Unpublished Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Educational Sciences. Izmir

Sinan, O., & Karadeniz, Ö. (2010). A sample event for the teaching of mitosis division. Elementary Education Online, 9(3), 1-7

Tekkaya, C., Çapa, Y., Yılmaz, Ö. (2000). Biology teacher candidates' conceptions in general biology. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 18, 140-147.

Tekkaya, C., Özkan, Ö. & Sungur, S. (2001). Biology concepts perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 21, 145-150.

Wersig, G. (1993). Information science: The study of postmodern knowledge usage. Information Processing & Management, 29(2), 229-239.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Zeidler, D. L. & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L. & Howes, E. V., (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2283

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Salih Gülen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).