THE DEVELOPMENT OF INQUIRY BY LEARNING CYCLE (RYLEAC) MODEL ON ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETIC CONCEPT TO INCREASE SCIENCE PROCESS SKILL AND THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS

Tirtawaty Abdjul, M. Mursalin, Elya Nusantari, W. Dj. Sarson Pomalato

Abstract


This study aims at developing an inquiry by learning cycle (RYLEAC) model in electricity and magnetic concept to increase science process skill and the learning achievement of students at physics department of Universitas Negeri Gorontalo and to describe factors supporting and inhibiting the RYLEAC learning model in basic physics subject, especially in electricity and magnetic concept. This study was a development study with 4D model. This study revealed: (1) the 4D development of RYLEAC learning model with the following steps of 4D: (a) define, (b) design, (c) develop, and (d) disseminate; (2) factors supporting the implementation of RYLEAC model implementation were (a) sufficient laboratory condition and facilities; (b) interaction among students, between students and lecturer, environment, and learning resources, lecturer allocated time to interact students and provide them with opportunities to ask questions. Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors were: (a) tools and media to carry out experiments were insufficient; (b) lack of reading the relevant books, making notes on what was gained from reading, discussion with friends, and lack of concentration during teaching and learning process.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


electricity, magnetic concept, RYLEAC learning model, science process skill

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Andrini, V. S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Method to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcome: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.7, No.3, 2016

Aksela, M. (2005). Dissertation: Supporting Meaningful Chemistry Learning and Higher-order Thinking through Computer-Assisted Inquiry: A Design Research Approach. Helsinky : Faculty of Science University of Helsinki.

Ali, M. (1993). Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar [Teacher in Teaching and Learning. Bandung]: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Ali, L. U., Suastra I. W, Sudiatmika A. A. I. A. R. (2013). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran IPA Ditinjau Dari Hakikat Sains Pada SMP DI Kabupaten Lombok Timur. E-journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, Volume 3, Tahun 2013.

Arends, R. (2012). Belajar Untuk Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Arista S. A., Irawati S. Primayriani A. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Untuk Menig katkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Kelas VIII.1. Jurnal Pendidikandan Pembelajaran Biologi 1 (1): 103-108 (2017). ISSN 2598-9669.

Arikunto & Suharsimi (2010). Prosedur Penelitiansuatupendekatanpraktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Avianti, R. & Yonata, B. (2015). Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Kooperatif Konsep Asam Basa Kelas XI SMAN 8 Surabaya. Journal of Chemical Education. Vol.4 (2): 224-231.

Astuti, T. (2015). Kekurangandan Kelebihan model Inquiry. Bandung.

Bruce, J. & Weil, M. (2000). Model of Teaching Boston London, Toronto, Tokyo, Singapore Hall Inc.

Budiasih, E. & Widarti H. R. (2004). Penerapan Pendekatan Daur Belajar (Learning cycle) hearts Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Praktikum Kimia Analisis Instrumen. Jurnal Pendidikandan Pembelajaran. 10 (1), 70-78.

Chiappetta, E. & Koballa T. R. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. United State: Pearson Education Inc.

Dahar, R. W. (1996). Teori-TeoriBelajar. Jakarta: Erlangga

Dimyati & Mudjiono (2006). Belajardan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

-------------. (2009). Belajardan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Eronika, S., Santoso, A., & Maryami, T. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapa Model Pembelajara Learning cycle 5 Fase Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Batu T.A 2012/2013 Pada Konsep Stoikiometri.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/ Gain Score. Retrieved online November 15, 2018.

Ismiati, C. (2017). Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran. UNY

Karyatin (2013). Penerapan Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing Berbasis Laboratoriumuntuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses dan Hasil Belajar IPA Mahasiswa Kelas VIII-4 di SMPN 1 Probolinggo. Tesis: Universitas Negeri Malang. (Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, Volume 1, Nomor 2, Juni 2013)

King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2011). Higher Order Thinking Skills. A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment, (Online), (www.cala.fsu.edu), diakses 5 Juni 2018.

Kreano, J. (2012). Desain model pengembanganperangkatpembelajaran matematik 3. E. Jounal Universitas Negeri Semarang. ISSN: 2086 – 2334. Vol. 3, No. 1.

Lete, M., Sutopo, & Yuliati, L. (2016). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Discovery Topik Tekanan Hidrostati. Jurnal: Pros Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM. Vol. 1, 2016. ISBN: 978-602-9286-21-2.

Maftuhah & Rahman, T. (2015). Penerapan Learning cycle Untuk Mening katkan Penguasaan Konsep Sistim Koordiasi Pada Mahasiswa SMA. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasidan Pembelajaran Sains.

Mauritha, S., Nur, S., & Adlim. (2017). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa MAN. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA (JIPI), 1(1). -ISSN: 2614-0500.

Sudjana, N (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neka, I. K., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing Berbasis Lingkunganterhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatifdan Penguasaan Konsep IPA Kelas V SD Gugus VIII Kecamatan Abang, eJournal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Study Pendidikan Dasar, (Online). (http://www.pasca.undiksha.ac.id), diakses 29 September 2018.

Ngalimun. (2014). Strategidan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta. Aswaja Perissindo.

Nismalasari, Santiani, & Rohmadi, M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika Volume 4 Nomor 2; 2016 ISSN 2338-4387

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototype to reach product quality. Dlm. van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (pnyt.). Design approaches and tools in educational and training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Polyiem, T. Nuangchalern, P., & Wongchantra, P. (2011). Learning

Achievement, Science Process Skills, And Moral reasoning Of Ninth Grade

Student Learned By 7E Learning Cycle And Socioscientific Issue-Based

Learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Hal 257-296.

Purwanto, N. 2012. Prinsip-Prinsipdan Teknik evaluasi Hasil Pengajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Rafiuddin. (2016). Application of Hypothesis Deductive Cycle Learning Model In The Matter Of Chemical Equilibrium To Improve Critical Thinking Skills Student High School. International Journal of Education and Research Volume 4 No.06 Juni 2016

Rahmadi, F. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Berorientasipada Kemampuan Penalarandan Komunikasi Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 10 – No. 2, ISSN: 1978-4538

Rahmawati K. S., Dasna W. (2016). Kajian Pengaruh Learning cycle 5E Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa SMP. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM. Vol. 1 2016. ISBN: 978-602-9286-21-2.

Rajabi M, Ekohariadi LGP, Buditjahjanto A 92015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Instalasi System Operasi Dengan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktek,. Vol.3 No. ISSN: 2302-285x

Ratumanan GT, Laurens (2006). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa Unversity Press

Revita R. (2017). Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis

Penemuan Terbimbing. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education

(p-ISSN: 2477-4758) e-ISSN: 2540-9670. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017, Hal. 15 – 26

Rizal M. (2014). Pengaruh Inquiry Terbimbing Dengan Multi Representasi Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sainsdan Penguasaan Terhadap Konsep IPA Mahasiswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol. 2 No. 3.

Rustaman N. Y., et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan.

Rustikayanti, R. N., Kartika I., Herawati Y. (2016). Adaptation of psychological changes in the third semester of pregnant women. The Southeast Asian Journal of Midwifery, 2(1): 45-49. 2017.

Sanjaya W. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Rawamangun-Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group.

-----------.. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan.Rawamangun-jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group

Santoso S. (2005). DinamikaKelompok. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Setiasih S. P. (2016). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Untuk Mening katkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Sifat-sifat Magnet Di Kelas V SD Sukajaya Kecamatan Jatinunggal Kabupaten Sumedang. Pena Ilmiah 1 (1).

Setyowati A., Subali B., Mosik (2014). Implementasi Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Smp Kelas VIII. Jurnal pendidikan fisika Indonesia 7 (2011): 89-96. Issn: 1693-1246. http://journal.unnes.ac.id.

Sudijono A. (2013). Pengantar Evaluasi pendidikan [Introduction to Educational Evaluation]. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Sudjana N. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sujana A. (2012). Pendidikan IPA teoridanpraktik. Sumedang: Rizal Nur.

Susanto A. (2014). Teori Belajardan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Susilo M. J. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan: Managemen Pelaksanaandan Kesiapan Sekolahmenyongsongnya. Yogyakarta. PustakaPelajar.

Susilaningrum D. F. Santosa S., Ariyanto J. (2017). Studi Komparasi Antara Penerapan Model Learning cycle 5E dan Discovery Learning terhadap Capaian Keterampilan Proses Sainsdan HasilBelajar Kognitif PadaMahasiswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Boyolal. Proceeding Biology Education Conference Volume 14, Nomor 1 ISSN: 2528-5742.

Tania B., Murni (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning cycle 5e Untuk Mening katkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa. Jurnal Gravity Vol.3 No. 1. ISSN 2442-515x, e-ISSN 2528-1976

Thiagarajan S., Semmel DS, Semmel MI (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota.

Wena M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Wiratana, Saida, Suma (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok (Group Investigation) Terhadap Keterampilan Proses danhasil Belajar Sains Mahasiswa SMP. E-Journal Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesa Program Studi IPA. Volume 3: 1-12. http://jurnal.unram.ac.id/index.php/jpp-ipa.

Warsono, Hariyanto (2014). Pembelajaran Aktif: Teoridan Asessment. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2569

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Tirtawaty Abdjul, M. Mursalin, Elya Nusantari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).