M. Mutmainah, Enos Taruh, Nurhayati Abbas, Masri Kudrat Umar


This quasi-experimental study is devoted to determining the influence of Blended Learning-based Guided Inquiry learning model and Self-Efficacy on students’ scientific literacy. To achieve this goal, this study involved 148 students at Grade X of Senior High School SMA Wirabakti as the population by employing a Treatment by Level 2 x 2 design. The sample, on the other hand, went through the Multi-Stage Random Sampling technique, i.e., sample randomly taken from the population without considering any levels. Further, this study also relied on several data sources, including (1) the data of students’ scientific literacy skill collected from a multiple-choice test with five options; (2) the data of self-efficacy collected from a questionnaire with five items of always (score 5), often (score 4), sometimes (score 3), rarely (score 2), and never (score 1). The collected data were then analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA 2x2). The results reveal that the Blended Learning-based Guided Inquiry learning model and Self-Efficacy do significantly influence students’ scientific literacy, by which this model serves as one of the proper learning models applied in the learning process that can improve scientific literacy.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



guided inquiry, blended learning, self-efficacy, scientific literacy

Full Text:



Adolphus, Telima, Arokoyu A. A. (2012). Improving Scientific Literacy among Secondary School Students through Integration of Information and Communication Technology. Journal of Science and Technology. (Vol. 2, No. 5): 444-448.

Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H Freeman and Company.

Banerjee A. (2010). Teaching Science Using Guided Inquiry as the Central Theme: A Professional Development Model for High School Science Teachers, Science Educator Fall 2010 Vol. 19, No. 2.

Bilgin I. (2009). The Effects Of Guided Inquiry Instruction Incorporating A Cooperative Learning Approach on University Students’ Achievement of Acid and Bases Concepts and Attitude Toward Guided Inquiry Instruction, Scientific Research and Essay Vol.4 (10), pp. 1038-1046.

Chaiyama N. (2015). The Development of Blended Learning Management Model in Developing Information Literacy Skills (BL-ILS Model) For Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 5, No. 7, July 2015, 483 – 489

Eggen P., Kauchak D. (2012). Strategies and Models for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Gormally, Brickman P., et al (2009). Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 3: No. 2, Article 16. Available at:

Graham C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs; Bonk, C., Graham, C., Eds.; Pfeiffer: San Francisco, CA, USA; pp. 3–21.

Gucluer E., Kesercioglu T., (2012). The Effect of Using Activities Improving Scientific Literacy on Students’ Achievement in Science and Technology Lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 1 (1):8-13.

Hernandez, Ikpeze, Kimaru (2015). Perspectives on Science Literacy: A comparative study of United States and Kenya. Chemistry Faculty Publications. 25 -34

Hubackova, Sarka, Semradova I. (2016). Evaluation of Blended Learning, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 217. 551-557.

Jacobsen, Eggen, Kauchak (2009). Methods for Teaching.-Metode-Metode Pengajaran Meningkatkan Belajar Siswa TK-SMA. (Terjemahan) Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Kuhlthau, Carol C. (2010). Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in the 21 Century, School Libraries Worldwide Volume 16. 18.

Lent, Robert W., et al (1986). Self-Efficacy in the Prediction of Academic Performance and Perceived Career Options, Journal of Counseling Psychology 1986, Vol. 33, No. 3, 265-269.

Liu M., Hsieh P., Cho Y., Schallert D. L. (2006). Middle School Students' Self- Efficacy, Attitudes, and Achievement in a Computer-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. Charlottesville: Vol.17, Iss. 3; pg. 225, 18 pg.

Llewellyn D. (2013). Teaching High School Science through Inquiry and Argumentation: Second Edition. USA: Corwin Press.

NRC (2011). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington: National Academy Press.

Nordin A. B., Norlidah A. (2013). Learning Outcomes and Student Perceptions In Using Of Blended Learning In History, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 103 (2013) 577- 585.

Norris S. P., Phillips L. M. (2003). How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense Is Central to Scientific Literacy. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:224 – 240, Published online in Wiley InterScience ( DOI 10.1002/sce.10066

Odegaard, Marianne Berit Haug, et al. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 167. (2015) 274-278.

Odja A. H., Payu C. S. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep IPA [An Analysis of Students’ Initial Scientific Literacy Skill in the Concept of Natural Sciences] Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia.

OECD (2014) PISA (2012). Results In Focus What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do With What They Know, OECD Publishing

Ogan, Feral-Bekiroglu, Arzu Arslan (2014). Examination of the Effects of Model-Based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 141. (2014) 1187-1191.

Okaz, Abeer Ali (2015). Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186. 600-603.

PISA (2015). Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Santrock, John W. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan [Education Psychology]. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media group. Tan KCD, Kim M, 2012. Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London.

Trna J., Trnova E., Sibor J. (2012). Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education in Science Teacher Training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 1(4):199—209.

Turiman, Punia, Omar J. et al. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 59 (2012) 110-116.

Vaughan N. (2014). Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Making the Assessment Connection. Education Sciences, 4 (4): 247-264.

Vieira R. M., Tenreiro-Vieira C. (2014). Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education, Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2014 Int J of Sci and Math Educ DOI 10.1007/s10763- 014-9605-2.

Wallace R. M., Kupperman J., et al (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75- 104., 5 Accessed on 18 Juli 2018.

Wenning C. J. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching.

Williams L., Nguyen N., Mangan J., -. Using Technology to Support Science Inquiry Learning, ( article/view/ 234/235) Accessed on 18 July 2018. 26 - 57

Zimmerman B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn, Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 82–91, (2000) doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016, available (online) at Accessed on 16 July 2018.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 M. Mutmainah, Enos Taruh, Nurhayati Abbas, Masri Kudrat Umar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).