EVALUATION OF IMPACT TO PISA SUCCESS OF SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Abstract
In this study, countries with the highest levels of achievement according to math and science scores in the PISA exams and countries with the lowest levels of achievement were compared in terms of school-based management policy indicators in education. This research is a quantitative research method. The research is in statistical scanning model. Data are taken directly from EUROSTAT, OECD and PISA database. The educational systems of the countries with the highest scores in the PISA exams and the countries with the lowest scores were compared. It is seen that local governments have more funding for schools, schools have the authority to determine their own teachers, schools have the authority to determine the textbooks, students have the authority to evaluate student achievement and the school budget, and these rates are above the OECD average. In high score countries inter-school disadvantage was below the OECD average. In low score countries inter-school disadvantage was above the OECD average.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, Ş. (2012). The Comparative assessment of the results of Pisa mathematical literacy in terms of socio-economic and socio-cultural variables. Education and Sciences, 37(164), 20-30.
Aypay, A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
Çobanoğlu, R., Kasapoğlu, K. (2010). The Whys and hows of finnish success at Pısa. Hacettepe University Journal of Education,39, 121-131.
EUROSTAT. (2019). Data. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database Date of access: 13.10.2019
Golding, J., Pembrey, M., & Jones, R. (2001). The Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology15(1), 74-87.
Kurt, T. (2006). Localization tendency in educational administration. Kastamonu Education Journal,14(1),61-72. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi.
Lakes, R. D, & Carter, P.A. (2004). Globalizing education for work. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
https://www.amazon.com/Globalizing-Education-Work-Perspectives-Sociocultural/dp/0805850295
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and anlyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Nahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-299.
Novotny, J. S. (2011). Academic resilience: academic success as a possible compensatory mechanism of experienced adversities and various life disadvantages. The New Educational Review, 23(1), 91-102. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Senol_Erdogmus/publication/281838481_Using_Kansei_Engineering_to_Improve_the_Physical_Environment_of_the_Classroom/links/56a543f808ae232fb207b53b.pdf#page=74
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality education. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/50293148.pdf. Date of access: 12.12.2019.
OECD. (2013). Education at glance. http://www.oecd.org/education/eag2013%20(eng)FINAL%2020%20June%202013.pdf. Date of access: 22.10.2019
OECD. (2017). Education at glance. https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/eag2017_eng.pdf. Date of access: 22.10.2019
OECD. (2019). Education at glance. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en. Date of access: 22.10.2019.
Özgen, V. (2011). Decentralization of educational services and service quality. Unpublished master thesis. Adnan Menderes University Department of Political Science and Public Administration. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
PISA. (2012). Results. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa- 2012-results.htm. Date of access: 09.12.2019
PISA. (2015). Result in focus. https://www.oecd.org.pisa-2015-results-in-focus. Date of access: 10.11.2019
PISA. (2018). Results. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm. Date of access: 10.12.2019
Taşcı, H. (2008). The situations of the school directors and the local administrators about regarding themselves as ready in regarding localization in education. Unpublished master thesis. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Sosyal Sciences Institute. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Türkoğlu, R. (2004). Opinions of local administrators to the problem of localization in education. İnönü University Journal of Education Faculty,5(8). https://www.pegem.net/Akademi/3-8247-Egitimde-Yerellesme-Sorununa-Kamu-Yonetimi-Temel-Kanunu-Tasarisi-ve-Yerel-Yonetim-Yasa-Tasarisinin-Getirdigi-Cozumler-Konusunda-Yerel-Yoneticilerin-Gorusleri.aspx
Yorulmaz, Y. İ., Çolak, İ., & Ekinci, C. E. (2017). An evaluation of PISA 2015 achievements of OECD countries within income distribution and education expenditures. Turkish Journal of Education,6(4), 169-185.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2908
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 İbrahim Çankaya, Çetin Tan, Bilal Çoban
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
