TOWARDS IMPLEMENTING INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN KENYA: LESSONS FROM THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN UASIN GISHU COUNTY

Roselyne J. Koskei, Mary Kerich Egesa, John K. Chang’ach

Abstract


Although Kenya has been helped by United Nations International Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the Bernard Van Lee Foundation (BVLF) and the Agha Khan Foundation, a lot remains to be done in the quest to achieve inclusive education. As such, fully cognizant of other factors that may account for this scenario, this study sought to determine the extent to which the school learning environment influences implementation of inclusive education in rural public primary schools within Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Adopting a mixed design approach, the study sampled 221 teachers. Stratified and proportionate sampling was used to select schools (ECDE centres) and teachers, while data was collected using questionnaires, interview schedules and observation guides. Data collected was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Pearson Chi-square and Regression, and correlation analysis were used to establish the existence and strength of association between the study variables. The level of significance was set at 95% or at a p-value of 0.05. Open-ended questions were analysed through reporting themes and quotas as they emerged. The analysed data was presented in frequency tables, graphs and charts denoting the findings of the study. The study findings indicated that there was there was significant association between the conduciveness of the school learning environment (χ2=99.712; df=16; p=0.000) and implementation of IE. Further, from R-square values, the school learning environment (19.0%) contributed to the implementation of inclusive education in rural public ECD centres in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. This paper establishes that the conduciveness of the environment enhances implementation of the IE. In learning environments where assistive technologies have been installed and working, then implementation may be deemed successful. Therefore, there is a need for deliberate funding by county government, since ECDE is a devolved function. There is also need for a legislation to govern ECDE centre, and this legislation ought to be in tandem with national goals and sustainable development goals.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


learning environment, challenges, inclusive education, Uasin Gishu County, special needs learning, early childhood development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achieng, R. (2015). The role of assistive technologies on quality educational outcomes of student with visual impairment in Kisumu County, Kenya. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(3), 39-50.

Ahmad, F. K. (2015). Challenging exclusion: Issues and concerns in inclusive education in India. Research paedia, 2(1), 15-32.

Berhanu, G. (2008). Ethnic minority pupils in Swedish schools: Some trends in overrepresentation of minority pupils in special educational programs. International Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 17-29.

Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 135-139.

Borg, J., Berman-Bieler, R., Khasnabis, C., Mitra, G., Myhill, W.N., & Raja, D.S. (2015). Assistive Technology for Children with Disabilities: Creating Opportunities for Education, Inclusion and Participation - A discussion paper. UNICEF & WHO.

Bouwer, A. C. & Du Toit, L. D. (2000). The At-Risk Disk: differential identification of intellectual and specific learning disability by teacher-teams in regular schools. South African Journal of Education, 20, 241-247.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187-249). Philadelphia: Kingsley.

Buysse, V., Skinner, D., & Grant, S. (2001). Towards a definition of quality inclusive childcare: Perspectives of parents and practitioners. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 146-161.

Carnell, L., & Tillery, M. (2005). Preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive co-teaching: A new approach for mathematics methods instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(7), 384-389.

Charema, J. (2007). From special schools to inclusive education: The way forward for developing countries south of the Sahara. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 8(1), 88-97.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

de Valenzuela, J. S., Copeland, S. R., Huaqing Qi, C. & Park, M. (2006). Examining Educational Equity: Revisiting the Disproportionate Representation of Minority Students in Special Education. Exceptional children 72(4), 425-441.

Dyson, A., Kozleski, E. B. (2008). Disproportionality in special education: A transatlantic phenomenon. In Florian, L., McLaughlin, M. (Eds.), Disability Classification in Education. Issues and Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 170–90.

Fierros, E. G., & Conroy, J. W. (2002). Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In D. J. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 39–70). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

GOK (2007). Kenya Vision 2030 Agenda. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Gordon, P., Kerzner, L., Sheldon, T., & Hansen, E. (2007). Assistive Devices in Canada: Ensuring Inclusion and Independence. Ontario: ARCH Disability Law Centre, Toronto.

Guralnick, M. J. (2005). An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 3-28) Baltimore: Brookes.

Hanson, M. J., Horn, E., Sandall, S., Beckman, P., Morgan, M., Marquart, J. (2001). After preschool inclusion: Children’s educational pathways over the early school years. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 65-73.

Hurley, J. & Horn, E. (2010). Family and Professional Priorities for Inclusive Early Childhood Settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 32(5), 335-350.

Jones, R. (2004). The science and meaning of the self. doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.2004.00454.x

Lancioni, G., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M. F & Singh, N. N. (2013). Assistive Technology. Interventions for Individuals with Severe/Profound and Multiple Disabilities. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series.

Lange, A. A., McPhillips, M., Mulhern, G., & Wylie, J. (2006). Assistive software tools for secondary- level students with literacy difficulties. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(3), 13-22.

Luciak, M., & Biewer, G. (2011). Equity and Inclusive Education in Austria: A Comparative Analysis. Research gate, (pp.17-44). Harvard Education Press

Odom, S. L., Horn, E., Marquart, J., Hanson, M., Wolfberg, P., Beckman, P., et al. (1999). On the forms of inclusion: Organizational context and individualized service models. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 185-199.

Oira, M. (2016). Use of modern assistive technology and its effects on educational achievement of Students with visual impairment at Kibos special secondary school Kisumu County, Kenya. (Masters thesis). Kenyatta University.

Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Swart, E. & Pettipher, R., (2005). A framework for understanding inclusion’, in E. Landsberg, D. Kruger & N. Nel (eds.), Addressing barriers to learning: A South African perspective, pp. 3–23, Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria.

Sweller, N., Graham, J. L. & Van Bergen, P. (2012). The Minority Report: Disproportionate Representation in Australia's Largest Education System. Exceptional children 79(1), 107-125 ·

Varld, B. (2008). The Globe, Sweden: Children’s World Organization. Unpublished Report.

Wagner, M. Newman, L., Cameto, R. & Levine, P. (2006). The Academic Achievement and Functional Performance of Youth with Disabilities. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).

Waitoller, F., Artiles, A. J., & Cheney, D. (2010). The miner’s canary: A review of overrepresentation research and explanations. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 29-49.

WHO (2011). World report on Disability. Geneva: WHO and World Bank.

Wilczenski, F. L. (2012). Development of a scale to measure attitude toward inclusive education. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 306-312.

Yamane T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed. New York: Harper and Row.

Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. F., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M.L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Volume I: Research Report. Final Report submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i12.3396

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Roselyne J. Koskei, Mary Kerich Egesa, John K. Chang’ach

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).