Halimatus Saadiah Abdul Wahid, Noor Hanim Rahmat, Nur Syakirah Dzuradeen, Nurhidayu Abdul Kadir


Online learning plays a crucial role in our education system, especially in this time of COVID-19 pandemic, in which online learning is widely and fully implemented in the education system across the world. It is not easy to ensure consistent engagement from students with this current norm in education. Are the students engaging with their peers, their instructor or even with the content of the course? Referring to Moore’s interaction framework, this study is aimed to examine further engagement methods used in online classrooms. A set of survey consists of 24 items were distributed and completed by fifty-five students from a public university in Malaysia. The results revealed the functions of the learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-content engagements in the online classroom, in which learner-to-instructor engagement plays the most significant role in maintaining students’ engagement. The findings of the study could serve as one of the references by educators and even students to improve strategies and performances in online learning.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


online learning, students’ engagement, learner-learner, learner-instructor, learner-content

Full Text:



Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., & Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of Interaction Provided by Online Distance Education Models. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2733–2748. Doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a

Aliaga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2000). Interactive Statistics. Saddle River, 3-15. Baker, D. L. (2011). Designing and orchestrating online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 401–411.

Banna, J. C., Stewart, M., Lin, G., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249–261.

Borup, J. (2016). Teacher Perceptions of Learner-Learner Engagement at a Cyber High School. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). 231-250. Retrieved from

Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129. Retrieved from

Britt, M. (2015). How to better engage online students with online strategies. College Student Journal, 49(3), 399–404.

Chou, C. C. (2000). Patterns of Learner-Learner Interaction in Distance Learning Networks. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 207-212.

Conole, G. (2013). Designing for Learning in an Open World. London: Springer. Doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0.

Davis, D. (2005). Business Research for Decision Making. Australia: Thomson South-Western.

Dhull, I., & Arora, S. (2019). Online Learning. International Education & Research Journal (IERJ), 3(8), 32-34. Retrieved from

Dikkers, A., G., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2013). Virtual high school teacher and student reactions to the social presence model. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(3), 156–170. Retrieved from

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. Retrieved from

Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Sternad, Z. S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500-1515. Retrieved from

Farid, A. (2014). Student online readiness assessment tools: a systematic review approach. Electron. J. E Learn. 12, 375–382. Retrieved from

Ferrer, D. (2019). History of Online Education. The Best Schools. Retrieved from

Gutierrez, K. (2013, August 7). Three Types of Interactions You Should Be Sustaining in eLearning. SHIFT. Retrieved from

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 184-191.

Illieva, B. (2019). Mapping Australian Higher Education. Grattan Institute. Retrieved from

Lee, J., Song, H.-D. & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning. Sustainability, 11, 985. Retrieved from

Leslie, H., J. (2019). Trifecta of Student Engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 2397-7604. Retrieved from

Lewis, S., Whiteside, A. & Dikkers, A., G. (2014). Autonomy and Responsibility: Online Learning as a Solution for At-Risk High School Students. International Journal of E-learning & Distance Education, 29(2), 1-11. Retrieved from

Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. (2007). Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perceptions of building learning communities in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9-24. Retrieved from

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. Doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.

Milne, J. (1999). Questionnaires: Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved from

Moore, M., J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education theory (pp. 19–24). New York: Routledge.

Mucundanyi, G. (2019). College student engagement in online learning (Order No. 22588786). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2285295034). Retrieved from

Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.

Oswal, S. K., & Meloncon, L. (2014). Paying Attention to Accessibility When Designing Online Courses in Technical and Professional Communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3), 271-300. Doi:1050651914524780.

Palmer, B. (2010). E Is for Fail. Slate. Retrieved from

Rahmat, N. H., Abdullah, N. A. T., and Kashiwazaki, K. (2020). An Analysis of Experiential Learning: A Case Study of Undergraduates from a Japanese University. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol592), pp 260-271. Retrieved from

Reddy, C. (2020). Grading System in Education: Advantages and Disadvantages. Wisestep. Retrieved from

Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning: A meaningful synthesis for educators. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113–124.

Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2004). Exploring the Interaction Equation: Validating A Rubric to Assess and Encourage Interaction in Distance Courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4). Retrieved from

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(1). Retrieved from

Saadatmand, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2014). Participants’ Perceptions of Learning and Networking in Connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 16–30.

Shackelford, J. L. & Maxwell, M. (2012) Contribution of Learner–Instructor Interaction to Sense of Community in Graduate Online Education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 249-260. Retrieved from

Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). Doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2170.

Smallwood, B. (2006). Classroom survey of student engagement. University of Northern Florida. Retrieved from

Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that Influence Participation in Online Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 38(2), 213-230. Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457.

Watkins, P. (2014). Grateful recounting enhances subjective well-being: The importance of grateful processing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(2), 91-98. Doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.927909.

Young, S., & Bruce, M., A. (2011). Classroom Community and Student Engagement in Online Courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 219-230. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Halimatus Saadiah Abdul Wahid, Noor Hanim Rahmat, Nur Syakirah Dzuradeen, Nurhidayu Abdul Kadir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).