THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT ON TEACHERS’ JOB SATISFACTION IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Marinette Bahtilla, Xu Hui

Abstract


This quantitative correlational study examined the relationship between the school environment and teachers’ job satisfaction. The study focused on finding the extent to which four predictors of the school environment (teachers’ collaboration, motivation, instructional materials, and teachers’ participation in decision making) predict teachers’ job satisfaction. Besides, the study also aimed at determining which variable is the best predictor of teachers’ job satisfaction. This study was guided by the following research questions: (1) To what extent does teachers’ collaboration influence their job satisfaction? (2) To what extent does teachers’ participation in decision-making influences their job satisfaction? (3) To what extent does motivation influence teachers’ job satisfaction? (4) To what extent do instructional materials influence teachers’ job satisfaction? The simple random sampling technique was used for this study. The sample population was made up of all 550 teachers in 15 public secondary schools, 320 females and 230 males. A questionnaire was used as an instrument for data collection. The instrument’s validity and reliability were ensured. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis. Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variable. Simple linear regression was used to determine the amount of variance in the dependent variable accounted for by each independent variable. In addition, a multiple regression was used to assess the ability of four control measures to predict teachers’ job satisfaction and to find out which of the independent variables is the best predictor of teachers’ job satisfaction. The study found out that all the independent variables make a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting teachers’ job satisfaction. The model explains 84.9% of the variance in teachers’ job satisfaction. Teachers’ participation in decision-making made the largest contribution (Beta= .626). This reveals that teachers’ participation in decision-making is the best predictor of teachers’ job satisfaction, followed by motivation (Beta= .532). This study provides useful findings which have implications for school leaders and policy-makers.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


school environment, teachers’ job satisfaction, teachers’ participation in decision-making, motivation, teachers’ collaboration, instructional materials.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdu-Raheem, B. O., & Oluwagbohunmi, M. F. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ problems of improvisation of instructional materials in social studies Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 15-18

Alabere, R. A. (2017). The importance of instructional materials in teaching English as second language: International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(9), 36-44.

Ali, Y, S., Dahie, A. M., & Ali, A. A. (2016). Teacher motivation and school performance, the mediating effect of job satisfaction: survey from secondary schools in Mogadishu: International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(1) 24-38

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Teacher attrition: A costly loss to the nation and the states. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review: Management Research and Practice, 3(4), 77.

Bahtilla, M. (2017). The impact of working conditions on teachers‘ attrition in secondary schools in the Southwest Region of Cameroon: International. Journal of Education and Research, 5(6), 59-78.

Bahtilla, M., & Hui, X. (2020). The principal as a curriculum-instructional leader: a strategy for curriculum implementation in Cameroon secondary schools. International Journal of Education and Research 8(4), 81-96.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2003). A multi-group analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations International Journal of Stress Management, 10(1), 16-38

Baptiste, M. (2019). No teacher left behind: the impact of principal leadership styles on teacher job satisfaction and student success: Journal of International Education and Leadership, 9(1), 1-10

Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303-333

Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(16)367-409.

Campbell, J. W. (2018). Efficiency, incentives, and transformational leadership: Understanding collaboration preferences in the public sector: Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 277-299.

Chandra, A., Cooper, W. D., Cornick, M. F., & Malone, C. F. (2011). A study of motivational factors for accounting educators: What are their concerns? Research in Higher Education Journal, 11(6), 19-36.

Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189-1204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029356

Creswell, J. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach; (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning conducting and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. Pearson Education, Inc. Boston

Djonko-Moore, C. M. (2015). An exploration of teacher attrition and mobility in high poverty racially segregated schools. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(5), 1063-1087.

Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 4(14), 959-977.

Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Sukru -Bellibas, M. (2013). A multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration: International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700

Dupriez, V., Delvaux, B., & Lothaire, S. (2016). Teacher shortage and attrition: Why do they leave? British Educational Research, 42(1), 21-39

Embse, N. P., Sandilos, L. E., Pendergast, L., & Mankin, A. (2016). Teacher stress, teaching-efficacy, and job satisfaction in response to test-based educational accountability policies. Learning and Individual Differences, 50(13), 308-317

Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501-530

Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senecal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of the perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 514-525. doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013.

Forte, A. M., & Flores, M. A. (2014). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 91-105

Grissom, J. A., Nicholson, S. N., & Harrington, J. A. (2014). Estimating the effects of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ work environments and job attitudes. Education Policy Evaluation and analysis, 36(4), 417-436.

Gemeda, F. T., & Tynjala, P. (2015). Exploring teachers’ motivation for teaching and Professional development in Ethiopia: Voices from the field. Journal of Studies in Education, 5 (2).169-186

Hallinger, P. Walker, A. Nguyen, D, T. Truong, T., & Nguyen, T, T. (2017). Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: a preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 222-239

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. (2003).The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.

Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011).The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of research: Review of Education Research, 81(2), 201-233.

Ikerionwu, J. C. (2000). Importance of aids and resources in classroom teaching. In A.M. Oyeneyin (Ed.), Perspective of classroom teaching. Abuja: Martmonic Investment Ltd.

Jackson, C. K. (2013). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1096-1116.

Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.

Jong, L, Meirink J. &., Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education: doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102925

Kaplan, A. (2014). Theory and research on teachers’ motivation: Mapping an emerging conceptual terrain. In P. W. Richardson, S. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge

Katz, I, &., Shahar, B. What makes a motivating teacher? Teachers’ motivation and beliefs as predictors of their autonomy-supportive style: School Psychology International 36(6) 575-588

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities: Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 608: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Khumalo, S. S. (2015). The implications of the System 4 approach on school leadership practices. International Education Studies, 8(7), 38-43

Krammer, M, Rossmann, P, Gastager, A & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2018). Ways of composing teaching teams and their impact on teachers’ perceptions about collaboration, European Journal of Teacher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1462331

Ladd, H. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235-261

Mafora, P. (2013). Managing teacher retention in a rural school district in South Africa, The Australian Association for Research in Education, 40(2), 227-240

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation: Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.

Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-96.

Mbua, F. N. (2003). Educational administration: Theory and practice. Limbe; Design House

McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. (2003). Organizational behavior: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution. Sydney: McGraw-Hill

Minarik, M. Thornton, B., &Perreault, G. (2003). Systems thinking can improve teacher retention. The Cleaning House, 76(5), 230-234

Mupa, P., & Chinooneka, T. I. (2015). Factors contributing to ineffective teaching and learning in primary schools: Why are schools in decadence? Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19),125-132

Manzoor, Q. A. (2012). Impact of employees’ motivation on organizational effectiveness: Business Management and Strategy, 3(1), 1-12.

Ndongko, T. M ., & Tambo, L. I. (2000). Educational development in Cameroon 1961- 1999 issues and perspectives: United State of America: Madison Wisdom Publishers Ltd.

Olayinka, A, B. (2016). Effects of instructional materials on secondary schools students’ academic achievement in social studies in Ekiti State, Nigeria: World Journal of Education, 6(1) 32-39

Tillman, W. R., & Tillman, C. J. (2008). And you thought it was the apple: A study of job satisfaction among teachers: Academy of educational leadership Journal, 12(3), 1-19.

Tatar, M., & Horenczyk, G. (2003). Diversity-related burnout among teachers: Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 397-408.

Tambo, L. I. (2003). Cameroon national education policy since the 1995 Forum Limbe: Design House.

Tickle, B. R., Chang, M., & Kim, S. (2011). Administrative support and its mediating effect on US public school teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 342-349

Torres, D, G. (2018). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001

Pogodzinski, B. (2015). Administrative context and novice teacher-mentor interactions; Journal of Educational Administration, 53(8) 40-65

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78

Reeves, P, M, Pun, W., & Chung, K, S. (2017). Influence of teacher collaboration on the job satisfaction and student achievement, Teaching and Teacher Education, doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.016

Roby, D. E. (2012). Teacher leader human relations skills: A comparative study Journal of Education, 132 (4), 54

Rooney, E. (2015). I’m just going through the motions: High-stakes accountability and teachers’ access to intrinsic rewards, American Journal of Education, 121(4), 475-500

Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514

Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4-36

Sadri, G., & Bowen, C. R. (2011). Meeting employee requirements: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is still a reliable guide to motivating staff. Industrial Engineer, 43(10), 44-48.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Still, motivated to teach? A study of school context variables, stress, and job satisfaction among teachers in senior high school. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 15-37

Sergent, B. (2003). Finding good teachers and keeping them; Educational Leadership, 60(8), 44 Simon, N. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1-36

Stoeber, J., & Rennert, D. (2008). Perfectionism in school teachers: Relations with stress appraisals, coping styles, and burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21, 37-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615800701742461.

Urick, A. (2016). The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention: Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 434-468

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic. Review. Educational Research Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Waltman, J., Bergom, I., Hollenshead, C., Miller, Jeanne, & August, L. (2012). Factors contributing to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among non-tenure-track faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 411-434.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i7.3799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Marinette Bahtilla, Xu Hui

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).