LECTURERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND THEIR ROLE IN SUPPORTING IT

Aida Montenegro

Abstract


A positive relationship between emotional engagement and teaching support was reported in a previous quantitative study on students’ perceptions of student engagement in four introductory lecture-based courses at four different German universities. The present qualitative research was designed to collect data from the four German male lecturers who participated in the previous study to explore their perceptions of student engagement and their role in supporting it. The lecturers of varying degrees of experience were observed while lecturing and subsequently interviewed to analyze their motivating teaching behavior. The analysis highlighted that lecturers (1) positioned themselves as committed professionals with a sense of ownership, (2) attributed positioning to students as social scientists, and (3) communicated messages characterized by supporting autonomous motivation. The lecturers implemented motivation strategies to engage their students who exhibited a preference for intentional silence. Certain characteristics of the students attending introductory level courses in Germany, such as having gained self-regulation skills at upper secondary school, highlight the importance of establishing specific goals before attending higher education courses.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


perceptions, autonomy, positioning, school culture, intentional silence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. 2002. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883

Balas, A. 2010. Using participation to assess students’ knowledge. College Teaching, 48(4), 122–142. doi: 10.1080/87567550009595827

Bandura, A. 1985. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. 2000. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3

Bebermeier, S., Nußbeck, F. W., & Austerschmidt, K. L. 2019. The impact of students’ skills on the use of learning support and effects on exam performance in a psychology students’ statistics course. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(1), 24–35. doi: 10.1037/stl0000170

Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. 2013. Mastery-approach goals and knowledge transfer: An investigation into the effects of task structure and framing instructions. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.004

Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. 2000. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3

Booth, A. 2001. Developing history students’ skills in the transition to university. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 487–503. doi: 10.1080/13562510120078036

Bradbury, N. A. 2016. Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 509–513. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2016

Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Mascareño Lara, M., & Denessen, E. 2021. Patterns of motivating teaching behaviour and student engagement: A microanalytic approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi: 10.1007/s10212-021-00543-3

Corradi-Fiumara, G. 1990. The other side of language: A philosophy of listening (C. Lambert, Trans.). London: Routledge.

Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. 2013. Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure? A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(4), 508–518. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002

Crompton, H. 2014. A diachronic overview of mobile learning: A shift toward student-centered pedagogies. In M. Ally & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Increasing access through mobile learning (pp 7-15). Canada: Athabasca University.

Cuseo, J. 2007. The empirical case against large class size: Adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 5–21.

Davies, B., & Harré, R. 1990. Positionings: The discursive production of selves In B. Davies (Ed.), A body of writing (pp. 87–106). New York: AltaMira Press.

Eurydice (2017). The education system in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015/2016: A description of the responsibilities, structures and developments in education policy for the exchange of information in Europe (Udo Michallik, Ed.). Bonn: German Eurydice Unit.

Fletcher, A. K. 2016. Exceeding expectations: Scaffolding agentic engagement through assessment as learning. Educational Research, 58(4), 400–419. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2016.1235909

Franck, E., & Opitz, C. 2006. Incentive structures for professors in Germany and the United States: Implications for cross‐national borrowing in higher education reform. Comparative Education Review, 50(4), 651–671. doi: 10.1086/507059

Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Montrosse, B., Mordica, J., & Mooney, K. 2011. Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Washington, DC: U.S.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. 2015. The role of oral participation in student engagement. Communication Education, 65(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019

Gilmore, P. 1985. Silence and sulking: Emotional displays in the classroom. In D. Tannen & M. Saville-Troike (Eds.), Perspectives on silence (pp. 139–162). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

Grund, C. K., & Tulis, M. 2020. Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 975–993. doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z

Hairston, C. 2015. Changed academic relationship between professors and students at Uni Potsdam: Impact of Bologna 2011–2012. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie., J. Salmi, P. Scott (Eds.), The European Higher Education Area (pp. 881–899). New York: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_53

Harré, R., Moghaddam, F., Pilkerton Cairnie, T., Rothbart, D. & Sabat, S. 2009. Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory and Psychology, 19(1): 5–31. doi: 10.1177/0959354308101417.

Hine, C. 2020. Strategies for reflexive ethnography in the smart home: Autoethnography of silence and emotion. Sociology, 54(1), 22–36. doi: 10.1177/0038038519855325

Hospel, V., & Galand, B. 2016. Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. 2009. Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. doi: 10.1037/a0014241

Jaworski, A. 1993. The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Kaplan, R. M., Spittel, M. L., Zeno, T. L. 2014. Educational attainment and life expectancy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1(1), 189–194. doi: 10.1177/2372732214549754

León, J., Santana, E., Loro, J. F., & Núnez, J. L. 2019. How can teachers encourage study? Preliminary validation of an assessment tool for messages in the classroom. In I Congreso Internacional de Educación e Intervención: Psicoeducativa, Familiar y Social (Vol. 262).

Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. E. 1997. Teachers’ evolving conceptions of one-to-one tutoring: A three-tiered teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(4), 398–430. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/749681

Lowman, J. 1995. Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

MacKinnon, D. 1999. The tyranny of talk: The multiple functions of silence in teaching and learning: Paper presented at the effective courses, effective teaching at university conference. University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia.

Matos, L., Reeve, J., Herrera, D., & Claux, M. 2020. Students’ agentic engagement Predicts longitudinal increases in perceived autonomy-supportive teaching: The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 579–596. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2018.1448746

Matusov, E., Duyke, K. von, & Kayumova, S. 2016. Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0

Meyer, K. 2009. Student classroom engagement: Rethinking participation grades and student silence (Doctoral dissertation). Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University, Ohio.

Montenegro, A. 2012. Analyzing EFL university students’ positionings and participation structures in a collaborative learning environment. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J, 14(1), 127–145.

Montenegro, A. 2017. Understanding the concept of agentic engagement for learning. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J, 19(1), 117–128. doi: 10.14483/calj.v19n1.10472

Montenegro, A. 2019. Why are students’ self-initiated contributions important? A study on agentic engagement. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(3), 291–315. doi: 10.17583/rise.2019.4540

Moreno‐Murcia, J.A.; Barrachina‐Peris, J.; Estévez, E.; Campillo, M.B.; Huéscar, E. 2021. Proposal for modeling motivational strategies for autonomy support in physical education. Int. J. Environ. Res.18, 1–21. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147717

OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs. Vol. III, PISA, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/19963777

Olivier, E., Galand, B., Hospel, V., & Dellisse, S. 2020. Understanding behavioural engagement and achievement: The roles of teaching practices and student sense of competence and task value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 1–23. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12342

Oplatka, I. 2018. Understanding emotion in educational and service organizations through semi-structured interviews: Some conceptual and practical insights. The Qualitative Report, 23(6), 1347–1363. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss6/6

Petrović, J., & Pale, P. 2015. Students' perception of live lectures’ inherent disadvantages, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.962505

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. 2001. Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378028

Quinlan, K. M. 2019. What triggers students’ interest during higher education lectures? Personal and situational variables associated with situational interest. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1781–1792. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1665325

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. 2004. Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. doi: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f

Reeve, J. 2009. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. 2011. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Reeve, J. 2012. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Boston, MA.

Reeve, J. 2013. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. doi: 10.1037/a0032690

Reeve, J. 2015. Giving and summoning autonomy support in hierarchical relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(8), 406–418. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12189

Reeve, J. 2016. Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In W. C. Liu, J. C. K. Wang, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learning: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 129–152). New York: Springer.

Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. 2020. How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451

Remedios, L., Clarke, D., & Hawthorne, L. 2008. The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 201–216. doi: 10.1177/1469787408095846

Sahlström, J. F. 2002. The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47–57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23870411

Santana, E., Fitzpatrick, I., Núnez, J. L., León, J., & Loro, J. F. 2019. Perfiles según el estilo comunicativo de los profesores de educación secundaria [Communicative style profiles of middle-school teachers]. In XIX congreso internacional de investigación educativa (pp. 238–244).

Santana-Monagas, E., Núnez, J. L., Loro, J. F., Huéscar, E., & León, J. 2022. Teachers’ engaging messages: The role of perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103556

Schwerdt, G., & Woessmann, L. 2017. The information value of central school exams. Economics of Education Review, 56, 65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.11.005

Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. 2016. Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. 2009. The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1348/000709908X304398

Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. 2011. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7

Tinto, V. 1993. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Vandenberghe, F. 2009. A philosophical history of German sociology. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., . . . Beyers, W. 2012. Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002

Vermote, B., Aelterman, N., Beyers, W., Aper, L., Buysschaert, F., & Vansteenkiste, M. 2020. The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 270–294. doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09827-5

Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. 2006. Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. 2015. Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–44). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316

Wilson, K., & Korn, J. H. 2007. Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 85–89. doi: 10.1080/00986280701291291




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i4.4243

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Aida Montenegro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).