EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF LESSON PLANNING ON EFL TEACHERS’ CLASSROOM PERFORMANCES IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN BENINESE POST BEGINNERS’ CLASSES
Abstract
This research aims to examine the challenges English teachers face during lesson planning and their impact on the academic performance of their learners. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data from five (5) secondary schools, three (3) public and two (2) private. 50 English teachers were administered a questionnaire. A focus group was held with ten (10) pedagogical advisors and ten (10) inspectors to understand better their perception of the challenges related to lesson planning and their impact on learners’ motivation and academic performance. The data analysis shows that most teachers are neither experienced nor trained in teaching English. In addition, school authorities have little control over preparation sheets, and lessons are conducted disregarding pedagogical standards. The data also reveals that the use and importance of lesson planning sheets are positively appreciated by all teachers, pedagogical advisors, and school inspectors as a teaching and learning tool. According to them, good preparation reinforces learners’ motivation and participation, hence improving their academic results. For better lesson planning, this study suggests that these teachers should be better trained on planning methods and techniques, taking into account the interests, needs, and perspectives of their learners.
Cette recherche vise à examiner les défis auxquels sont confrontés les enseignants d'anglais lors de la planification des cours et leur impact sur les performances académiques de leurs apprenants. Des méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives ont été utilisées pour collecter des données dans 5 écoles secondaires, 3 publiques et 2 privées. 50 enseignants d'anglais ont été soumis à un questionnaire et un groupe de discussion a été organisé avec 10 conseillers pédagogiques et 10 inspecteurs afin de mieux comprendre leur perception des défis liés à la planification des leçons et leur impact sur la motivation des apprenants et les performances académiques. L'analyse des données recueillies montre que la grande majorité des enseignants ne sont ni expérimentés ni formés à l'enseignement de l'anglais. En outre, les autorités scolaires ont peu de contrôle sur les feuilles de préparation et les leçons sont menées au mépris des normes pédagogiques. Les données révèlent également que l'utilisation et l'importance des fiches de cours sont appréciées positivement par tous les enseignants, les conseillers pédagogiques et les inspecteurs en tant qu'outil d'enseignement et d'apprentissage. Selon eux, une bonne préparation renforce la motivation et la participation des apprenants, d'où l'amélioration de leurs résultats scolaires. Pour une meilleure planification des cours, cette étude suggère que ces enseignants soient mieux formés sur les méthodes et techniques de planification en tenant compte des intérêts, besoins et perspectives de leurs apprenants.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alatis J. E., Alatis P. M., and Altman H. B. (1980). The Second Language Classroom. Massachusetts: Oxford University Press.
Biesta, G. (2020). What really matters in education? VIA University College. Retrieved 2019-05-01 from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLcphZTGej c#t=18.2391287
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. www.tesl-ej.org.
Brown, H. D. (2020). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Byrne, D. (2021). English Teaching Perspectives. Singapour: Longman Singapour Publishers.
Cambridge, E. S. O. L. (2007). CELTA syllabus and assessment guidelines. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Teaching Awards.
Dangerfield, L (1985). At the chalkface: Practical Techniques in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) ltd.
Guedou, T. (2006). Teachers’ Behaviour Through Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language in Benin secondary schools. Benin, Unpublished (UAC).
Harmer, J. (1983). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London and New York: Longman.
Harmer, J. (2017). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Iwikotan E. (2020). English Teachers Training: Present Situation and Suggestions for its Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 245-264.
Jasmi. (2014). English Teacher’s Difficulties in Designing Lesson Plan Based on 2013 Curriculum. In Nurkamto, et al. (eds) The 61st TEFLIN International Conference, pp. 189-191, Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University.
Keller, J. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS approach. Florida State University. www.scholar.google.fr
Mensah, A. (1989). Classroom Management for Basic School Teachers. Winneba: Ghana University Press.
Nissa, A. K., and Jayadi, B. (2015). Teacher’s Difficulties in designing lesson plan of 2013 curriculum. The 13th KOLITA International Conference, pp.83-86, Jakarta: Atma Jaya University
Rajar, T. N. (1972). Teaching and Learning English. Singapour: Longman Singapour Publishers.
Schoenfeldt, M. K., and Salsbury, D. E. (2019). Lesson planning: A research-based model for K-12 classrooms. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Skowron, J. (2018). Powerful lesson planning: Every teacher’s guide to effective instruction (2nd Edition). California: Corwin.
Spratt, M. (2019). At The Chalkface: Practical Techniques in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) ltd.
Tamakloe, E. K.; Amadahe, F. K. and Atta, E. T. (2005). Principles and Methods of Teaching. Accra: Ghana University Press.
Tauber, R. (2008). An Introduction to English Language Teaching. Bath: Longman, The Bath Press
Utari, R. (2014). An analysis of English lesson plans and their implementation in the teaching-learning process. (Thesis, Indonesia University of Education, 2014, Unpublished).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i9.4465
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Pédro Marius Egounleti, Coffi Martinien Zounhin Toboula, Elie Yebou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).