CHALLENGES OF BEING A SECONDARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHER

Necdet Güner, Hülya Çermik

Abstract


This study was conducted to reveal the challenges experienced by mathematics teachers working in secondary schools. The study is a descriptive case study which was carried out in accordance with a qualitative understanding. The participants of the study consisted of 145 secondary school mathematics teachers. The participants reported the challenges they experienced by writing on a form developed by the researchers. The data obtained were analysed through the content analysis method, by considering the professional experiences of the participants. The findings of the study indicated that the challenges experienced by the participating mathematics teachers were based on four basic sources including learner, teaching process, parents, and curriculum. Learner-related challenges included students’ negative attitude towards mathematics, lack of prior knowledge, unwillingness to learn, lack of study habits and misconceptions. In terms of the challenges related to the teaching process, the participants stated that they experienced difficulties in the following areas: teaching according to student level, teaching abstract concepts, the pressure of high-stake tests, teaching with more effort compared to other courses, and limited technological infrastructure. Parent-based challenges, on the other hand, included parents’ prejudice against mathematics and unrealistic expectations from their children. As for the curriculum-related challenges, the mathematics teachers faced difficulties because of an excessive number of topics in the curriculum, abstract concepts, constantly changing curriculums and curriculum’s being above the student level.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


Mathematics, secondary school, mathematics teacher, challenges experienced

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkaş, E., & Toluk Uçar, Z. (2020). Public Opinions on Mathematics. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(2), 473-491.

Al Mutawah, M. A. (2015). The influence of mathematics anxiety in middle and high school students' math achievement. International Education Studies, 8(11), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p239

Bakan Kalaycıoğlu, D. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(5), 1391-1401. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2731

Balay, R. (2004). Globalization, information society and education. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000097

Berkant, H. G., & Gençoğlu, S. Ş. (2015). Mathematics teachers’ views working in different types of high school on mathematics education. KSI University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 194-217.

Bonne, L., & Johnston, M. (2016). Students' beliefs about themselves as mathematics learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.001

Bozkurt, E., & Dülger, M. (2021). Through Turkish parents' eyes: Middle-school mathematics education. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(4), 1507-1534. http://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.873357.

Brown, M., Brown, P., & Bibby, T. (2008). I would rather die: Reasons given by 16-years-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800801915814

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Approaches. London: SAGE.

Dağdelen, S., & Ünal, M. (2017). Problems and suggestions in mathematics teaching and learning process. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 483-510. https://doi.org/ 10.23891/efdyyu.2017.19

Frommelt, M. C., Schiefele, U., &, Lazarides, R. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm, supportive instructional practices, and student motivation in mathematics classrooms. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(3), 5-22.

Forsblom, L., Peixoto, F., &, Mata, L. (2021). Perceived classroom support: Longitudinal effects on students’ achievement emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101959

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Hanin, V., Colognesi, S., & Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2021). From perceived competence to emotion regulation: assessment of the effectiveness of an intervention among upper elementary students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 287–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00481-6

Ingram, N., & Meaney, T. (2021). “My parents are pretty pleased with my maths”: students’ navigation of identity stories about mathematics, Research in Mathematics Education, https://10.1080/14794802.2021.1938190

Jameel, H. T., & Ali, H. H. (2016). Causes of poor performance in mathematics from the perspective of students, teachers and parents. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Science, 15(1), 122-136.

Konstantinidou, E., & Kyriakides, L. (2022). Instructional engagement and student learning outcomes: Direct and indirect effects based on country-specific contingencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101144

LGS (2022). Secondary Schools Entrance Examination. https://cdn.eba.gov.tr/icerik/2022/06/2022_LGS_rapor.pdf.

Leon, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Ortega, M. (2018). Teaching quality: High school students' autonomy and competence. Psicothema, 30(2), 218-223. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.23

Lincoln, V., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. London: SAGE.

Liu, Y., & Leighton, J. P. (2021). Parental self-efficacy in helping children succeed in school favours math achievement. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-15. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021. 657722

Marban, J. M., Palacios, A., & Maroto, A. (2021). Enjoyment of teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00341-y

Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12-24. http://education.gsu.edu/JUME

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

MoNE (2020). Ministry of National Education. Statistical information about higher education exam. https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2020/YKS/yks_sayisal_27072020.pdf

MoNE (2018). Ministry of National Education. Secondary school mathematics (9, 10, 11, and 12th grades) curriculum. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=351.

Murray, S. (2011). Declining participation in post-compulsory secondary school mathematics: students' views of and solutions to the problem. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 269-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.624731

Passolunghi, M., DeVita, C., & Pellizzoni, S. (2020). Math anxiety and math achievement: The effects of emotional and math strategy training. Developmental Science, 23(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12964

Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24, 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8

Özcan, B. N. (2016). Investigation of parents’ beliefs and participation in their children’s math learning process. The Journal of International Education Science, 3(8), 105-117.

Quintero, M., Hasty, L., Li, T., Song, S., & Wang, Z. (2021). A multidimensional examination of math anxiety and engagement on math achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology.92(3), 955-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12482.

Sciffer, M. G., Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2022). Does school socioeconomic composition matter more in some countries than others, and if so, why? Comparative Education, 58(1), 37-51, https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2021.2013045

Thomas, G. (2011). “A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure.” Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884

Wilson, P. S., Cooney, T. J., & Stinson D. W. (2005). What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: Nine high school teachers' perspectives? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-4796-7

Yanık, H. B., Bağdat, O., Gelici, Ö., & Taştepe, M. (2016). The challenges facing beginning middle school mathematics teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(36), 130-152

Yayla, O., & Bangir-Alpan, G. (2019). Teachers’ and students’ opinions on the causes of student difficulties with mathematics. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 6(2), 401-425.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.

Yu, R., & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.120426




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i11.4534

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Necdet Güner, Hülya Çermik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).