IS THERE A LEARNING TYPE?! REVISITING LEARNING-STYLES THEORY IN VIEW OF LEARNING AND EMOTION

Matthias Huber, Claude Muller

Abstract


Over the last twenty years the VAK learning-styles theory, which differentiates between visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning types, has been criticized and debunked by various academic disciplines and declared by several scientists as a neuromyth. Regardless of its criticism, the concept has retained its popularity within the teacher-community and is regularly taught in teacher education. The aim of this article is to meet this theory-practice gap in a constructive way. After (1) a short introduction, this paper starts (2) with a differentiated assessment of the theory. The VAK learning-style theory will be deconstructed into four main hypotheses which are then (3) one at a time, evaluated (empirically as well as in view of teaching practice). After a complex evaluation of the concept and its criticism, this article continues with (4) showing, how the learning-style theory provides teachers with an approachable understanding of learning and comforts them in dealing with learning differences within a heterogenic student body. Considering the empirical evidence on the one hand and teacher’s needs on the other hand, this article (5) lines out fundamental insights of learning theories, as well as (6) the relevance and capacity of emotions for perception and evaluation processes. Approaching (7) learning style-theory from the perspective of learning-theories and theories of emotion, which highlights the interdependency of learning, achievement, and emotion, finally allows concluding the paper (8) with four specific and normative principles, which allows teachers to benefit from an empirical accurate understanding of a complex process of learning and teaching.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


learning-styles, learning type, emotion, teaching, learning, achievement, education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abele-Brehm, A. E., & Gendolla, G. H. (2000). Motivation und emotion. In J. H. Otto, H. A. Euler & H. Mandl (Eds.), Emotionspsychologie. Ein Handbuch (pp. 297–305). Weinheim: Beltz.

An, D., & Carr, M. (2017). Learning styles theory fails to explain learning and achievement: Recommendations for alternative approaches. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 410-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.050

Arndt, P. A. (2012). Design of learning spaces: Emotional and cognitive effects of learning environments in relation to child development. Mind, Brain Education, 6(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01136.x

Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotions are real. Emotion, 12(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027555

Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles. An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834

Cedar, R., & Willingham, D. (2010): The Myth of Learning Styles. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 32-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139

Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK Learning Styles Self-Assessment Questionnaire. Online: https://www.businessballs.com/freepdfmaterials/vak_learning_styles_questionnaire.pdf (01.09.2021)

Code, J. (2020). Agency for Learning: Intention, Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5(19), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. Learning and Skills Research Center. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/64981.

Constantinidou, F., & Baker, S. (2002). Stimulus modality and verbal learning performance in normal aging. Brain and Language, 82(3), 296-311. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00018-4

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978a). Teaching students through their individual learning style. Prentice-Hall.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978b). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Psychology.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approach for grades 7-12. Allyn and Bacon.

Dunn, R., & Honigsfeld, A. (2009). Learning-Style Responsive Approaches for Teaching Typically Performing and At-Risk Adolescents. The Clearing House, 82(5), 220-224. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.5.220-224

Dunn, R., & Honigsfeld, A. (2013). Learning Styles: What we know and what we need. Educational Forum, 77(2), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2013.765328

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The Impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2012). Application of styles in educational instruction and assessment. In L. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg, S. Rayner (Eds.), The handbook of intellectual styles (pp. 169-208). Springer.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.

Greenberg, J., Pomerance, L., & Walsh, K. (2016). Learning About Learning: What every new teacher needs to know. National Council on teacher quality (Eds.) https://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Learning_About_Learning_Report

Hagenauer, G. (2011). Lernfreude in der Schule. Waxmann.

Hascher, T. (2010). Learning and emotion: Perspectives for theory and research. European Education Research Journal, 9(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.

Hascher, T., & Brandenberger, C. C. (2018). Emotionen und Lernen im Unterricht. In M. Huber & S. Krause (Eds.), Bildung und Emotion (pp. 289–310). Springer VS.

Helmke, A. (2015). Unterrichtsqualität – erfassen, bewerten, verbessern. Kallmeyersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014): Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817-824. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3817

Huber, M. (2017). Lernen und Emotion. Jugendhilfe, 55(5), 450–457.

Huber, M. (2018). Emotionale Markierungen. Zum grundlegenden Verständnis von Emotionen für bildungswissenschaftliche Überlegungen. In M. Huber & S. Krause (Eds.), Bildung und Emotion (pp. 91–110). Springer VS.

Huber, M. (2020). Emotionen im Bildungsverlauf. Entstehung, Wirkung und Interpretation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Kaplan-Solms, K., & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. CT: International Universities Press.

Kavale, K.A., Hirshoren, A., & Forness, S. R. (1998). Meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences: A critique of what was Dunn. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(2), 75-80.

Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory. McBer & Company.

Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive Styles Environmentally Sensitive Individual Differences in Cognition: A Modern Synthesis and Applications in Education, Business, and Management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(1), 3-33. DOI: 10.1177/1529100614525555

Krätzig, G., Arbuthnott, P., & Katherine, D. (2006) Perceptual Learning Style and Learning Proficiency: A Test of the Hypothesis. Journal of Education Psychology, 98(1), 238-248.

Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In T. Dagleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 3–20). Wiley.

Lethaby, C., & Harries, P. (2016). Learning styles and teacher training: are we perpetuating neuromyths?, ELT Journal, 70(1), 16-27. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccv051

Lipowsky, F. (2007). Was wissen wir über guten Unterricht. Friedrich Jahresheft, 25, 26– 30.

Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M. (2017). Dispelling the Myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(134), 1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314

Martin, S. (2010). Teachers using learning styles: Torn between research and accountability? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1583-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.009

Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI Hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer visualizer cognitive style? Learning and individual differences, 16(4), 321- 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.10.001

Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 477–500. DOI: 10.1080/02699930244000039

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-Based Higher Education - Is the Learning Styles 'Myth' Important?. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review. Frontiers in education, 5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451

Papadatou-Pastou, M., Gritzali, M., & Barrable, A. (2018). The Learning Styles Educational Neuromyth: Lack of Agreement Between Teachers' Judgments, Self-Assessment, and Students' Intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 3(105), doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00105.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles. Concepts and Evidence. Association for Psychological Science, 9(3), 105- 119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

Pasquinelli, E. (2012). Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist? Mind, Brain and Education, 6(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01141.x

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corolaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Education Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Pekrun, R. (2018). Emotion, Lernen und Leistung. In M. Huber, Matthias, & S. Krause (Eds.), Bildung und Emotion (pp. 215–232). Springer VS.

Pekrun, R., Götz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002

Reisberg, D., & Hertel, P. (Eds.). (2004). Memory and Emotion. Oxford University Press.

Reynolds, M. (1997). Learning Styles. A Critique. Management Learning, 28(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507697282002

Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109–125.

Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934

Rudy, J. W. (2008). The neurobiology of learning and memory. MA: Sinauer.

Schmidt-Atzert, L., Peper, M., & Stemmler, G. (2014). Emotions-psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. Kohlhammer.

Sachser, N. (2004). Neugier, Spiel und Lernen. Verhaltensbiologische Anmerkungen zur Kindheit. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 50 (4), 475-486.

Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The relationship between learning-style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 606-616.

Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). Oxford University Press.

Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence from the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902928969

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational researcher, 28(7), 4–14.

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L. F. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 486 -506. DOI: 10.1177/1529100614525555

Tardif, E., Doudin, P., & Meylan, N. (2015). Neuromyths Among Teachers and Student Teachers. International Mind, Brain and Education, 9(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12070

Torrijos-Muelas, M., Torrijos-Muelas, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A.R. (2021). The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923

Tulbure, C. (2011). Do different learning styles require differentiated teaching strategies?, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.052

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505

Willingham, D. T., & Riener, C. (2010). The Myth of Learning Styles. Change the Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, D. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit- formation. Journal of comparative neurology and psychology, 18(5), 459-482.

Zacharis, N. Z. (2011). The effect of learning style on preference for web-based courses and learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01104.x

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety. The state of the art. Plenum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i3.4688

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Matthias Huber, Claude Muller

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).