Nanpaphat Banticharoenchod, Piyatida Panya, Arun Suikraduang


This paper is reported to develop of the school administrator quality evaluation model (SAQEM) under the Office of Basic Education Commission for assessing the quality of the school educators who are the school directors with the SAQEM model through the texts, documents, reports, research articles, professional expert interviews, and surveying the school administrators for confirming the suitability and feasibility with using the MACR: Multiple-Attribute Consensus Reaching technique for debate meeting to trial in schools for evaluating the SAQEM model was administered. The findings of this research study have found that: the format of the SAQEM model consisted of four stages, such as; planning the preparing evaluation, proceeding evaluation, evaluating result reported summary, and reflection of the evaluating results stages that composed of four components and 55 indicators. The SAQEM included of the principals and rationales, the evaluating targets, and the using guidelines to application were suitability and possibility were evidence of high level, adeptly.  The external evaluation for school administrators whose past for the third evaluation of their qualities indicated that of excellence level was evaluated. In the other hand, the school administrators whose non past in the third evaluation revealed that of the specialized quality were compared, respectively. The SAQEA model was validated and discriminated to fidelity classification of the qualities of the school administrators who were evaluated in their schools at the third external evaluation and external evaluation through three rounds differentiated, clearly. The evaluating results of the SAQEM model that it was also useful of the appropriability to the possibility toward the accuracy evidence of the excellence level, interestingly.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



development, school administrator, quality, evaluation, model, multiple-attribute consensus reaching technique


Buason, R. (1997) Project: Assessment research. Edition 2: Bangkok Toan Oo Grammy.

Chiengkul, W. (2004). Glossary modern management. Edition 2: Bangkok: Saitharn Printing.

Dolprasit, S. (2006). Competencies of teachers and education administrators. Journal of Education of Thailand: pp. 10-13.

Jongsathit, J. and Pinmani, S. (2000). Education index. 4th edition. Bangkok: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand (WVO).

Kanjanawasi, S. (2009). Theory assessment. Edition 7th. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Ministry of Education. (2008). The implementation of public administration studies. Bangkok Teachers Council.

Nevo, D. (1983). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature. Review of Educational Research. 53 (Spring). 117-128.

Phusi-On, S. (2004). The development of a model to assess the quality of the external evaluators for the basic education. Ph.D. Thesis. Narasuan University, photocopier.

Scriven, M. (1969). An introduction to meta-evaluation. Educational Product Report. 2 (5): 36-38, February.

Smith, P. and Merrit, G. (2002). Proactive risk management: Controlling uncertainly in product development. Proactive Risk Management. Unpaged: June.

Srisa-Ard, B. (2003). Curriculum development and research programs. Bangkok: Suweriya Printing.

The Princeton Review. (2016). A day in the life of a school administrator. Retrieved from

University of Southern California. (2016). What does the school administer do? Retrieved from

Wongwanit, S. and Setthapanit, N. (2001). The quality of processed material in a series of lectures. Assessment and Project Management. Evaluation Units 6-10. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat University Printing.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Nanpaphat Banticharoenchod, Piyatida Panya, Arun Suikraduang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).