DEVELOPING THE EVALUATION MODEL THROUGH LEARNING MANAGEMENT INTEGRATING UNIFIED INSTRUCTIONS OF THE BASIC EDUCATIONAL TEACHERS UNDER OFFICE OF THE BASIC EDUCATION COMMISSION (OBEC)

Ronnachai Srisuthunyavong, Piyatida Punya, Nuttachai Juntachum

Abstract


The aim of this research study was to develop the evaluation model (EM) through learning management integrating unified instructions (LMIUI) of the Basic Educational Teachers under Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC) with the research and development process. To have integrated with the texts, documents, reports, research articles, and a database of three professional education experts was interviewed. The draft evaluation form to verify the suitability and feasibility of this evaluating draft form with nine qualified experts using a technique based on a specialized symposium (Connoisseurship). The EM model estimates to trial in 13 basic schools under the Roi-Et Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The EM model was assessed with the feasibility of appropriate dimensions for accuracy and usefulness by the board of evaluators was involved in determining the concurrent validity forms of assessment and evaluation form that the dimensions of the possibility of reasonable involved in the trial EM form. The results of this research have found that: the factors of the EM model through the LMIMU should contain four components. The first component includes the preparation teaching has six indicator components, the second on the learning process has three components above 10 indicate, the third element of the learning media has four indicators, and the fourth components on the measurement and evaluation of learning contained 10 indicate were developed. In terms of the evaluation of the EM model, the components include the rationale for the assessment, the goal of the assessment, the evaluation focused on components and indicators. The process and method of evaluation consists of four phases: preparatory assessment, the evaluation process and the conclusion of the assessment report, evaluation criteria was an absolute criterion by fixing a percentage of the guide contains the descriptions and application quality, evaluator sources, the evaluating instrument, collected data, data analysis, and the evaluation summary report were appropriate and the possibility as high level. The concurrent validity of the LMIUI instructional teachers, it has found that the overall of training academic teachers rating was higher than the teachers who had not been trained that evidence of statistical significance at 0.01 levels, differently. The perceptions for involving evaluation groups in the overall trial of the EM model were individual components at a high level. The overall results of the EM model with the LMIMI instruction indicated the possibility of reasonable accuracy and usefulness at a high level, significantly.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


development, the evaluation model, learning management, integrating unified instructions

References


Academic and Educational Standards. (2009). Approach to learning according to the core curriculum basic education act BE 2551. The technical and educational standards. Board of Education Database.

Academic and Educational Standards. (2013). The learning management, integrated unified. Revised edition. Bangkok: Academic and educational Standards. Office of the Basic Education.

Buason, R. (2006). Project: Assessment research. 2nd edition. Bangkok: A reed Grammy.

Dockery, D. (2000). Integrating faith & learning in higher education. (Speech). The Research Institute of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. Fall Meeting, September 20, 2000

Stufflebeam, D. L. and A.J. Shinkfield, A. J. (2008). Evaluation Theory. Models and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education. (2010). The activities of the group as a core curriculum of Basic Education Act BE 2551. 2. Type II: A gathering of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Thailand.

Nevo, D. (1983). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An Analytical Review of the Literature. Review of Education Research. 53: pp. 117-128,

Stufflebeam, D. L. and A.J. Shinkfield, A. J. (2008). Evaluation Theory. Models and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The Bureau of Educational Testing Service. (2011). Guidelines for assessing the quality of education. Fundamental to ensuring the quality of the education. Commission Basic Education, Ministry of Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.537

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Ronnachai Srisuthunyavong, Piyatida Punya, Nuttachai Juntachum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).