RECONSIDERING THE USE OF POST-POSITIVIST PARADIGM IN SOCIAL SCIENCES: IS IT POSSIBLE?

Mohamad Musa, Khaldoun Aldiabat

Abstract


This paper investigates the evolving landscape of research methodologies in the social sciences, focusing on the renewed interest in post-positivism amid growing dissatisfaction with strictly quantitative approaches. The study traces the experiences of a junior social work researcher struggling with paradigm identification, ultimately finding alignment with the adaptable and inclusive nature of post-positivism. By highlighting post-positivism's shift from a rigid quest for absolute truths to an emphasis on interactive dialogue and continuous learning, this research enriches the methodological discourse. The examination of post-positivism’s nuanced ontological, epistemological, and axiological perspectives underscores the significance of reflexivity and critical engagement in research. The study advocates for integrating qualitative and quantitative methods within the post-positivist paradigm to address complex social issues more effectively. It emphasizes the pivotal role of junior researchers in contributing to paradigm discussions and advancing the field, particularly in the scholarship of teaching and learning. By revisiting the post-positivist paradigm, this research encourages graduate students and emerging scholars to critically examine and understand the epistemological foundations that shape knowledge production. This exploration not only enriches their research but also equips them with essential skills for engaging with varied perspectives and advancing scholarly discourse.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


post-positivism, social sciences methodology, mixed methods, reflexivity, epistemology, and research paradigms

Full Text:

PDF

References


Babbie, E. R. (2011). Introduction to social research. Wadsworth Cengage learning.

Calderwood, K. A. (2002). Incorporating multiple epistemologies into teaching statistics to social work students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(1-2), 7-32.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Gibbs, A. (2001). The changing nature and context of social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 31(5), 687-704.

Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: positivism dressed in drag? Journal of research in nursing, 11(3), 195-203.

Glicken, M. D. (2003). Social research: A simple guide. Pearson College Division.

Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2010). Research methods for sports studies. Routledge.

Lapid, Y. (1989). The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International studies quarterly, 33(3), 235-254.

Prof, G. (2017). An Expose of the Relationship between Paradigm, Method and Design in Research. The Qualitative Report, 22(12), 3363-3382.

Reimer, B. (1996). Qualitative research and the post-positivist mind. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 123-126.

Ryan, AB. (2006) Post-Positivist Approaches to Research. In: Researching and Writing your thesis: a guide for postgraduate students. MACE: Maynooth Adult and Community Education, pp. 12-26.

Schuerman, J. R. (1982). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 56(1), 144-146.

Wildemuth, B. M. (1993). Post-positivist research: two examples of methodological pluralism. The Library Quarterly, 63(4), 450-468.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i7.5393

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamad Musa, Khaldoun Aldiabat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).