TEACHER DISPOSITION, CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT, AND STUDENT ACADEMIC MOTIVATION: A PATH MODEL ANALYSIS ON ENGAGEMENT OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Mediatrix J. Anayatin, Lyndon A. Quines

Abstract


This study aimed to identify the best-fit model for student engagement among senior high school students in public schools in Region XII, focusing on teacher disposition, classroom management, and student academic motivation. A quantitative, non-experimental research design was used, employing correlational techniques and path analysis. The sample included 400 senior high school students from General Santos City, Koronadal, Sarangani, and South Cotabato, selected via stratified random sampling. Statistical tools used were mean, Pearson’s r, and path analysis, with adapted and validated survey questionnaires. The results revealed that teacher disposition and classroom management levels were very high, while student academic motivation was high. As a result, student engagement was also very high. Further analysis showed that teacher disposition, classroom management, and academic motivation were significantly correlated with student engagement. Model 3 emerged as the best fit, emphasizing the role of teacher disposition in terms of motivation to teach, teacher efficacy, willingness to learn and conscientiousness influencing student engagement through classroom management in terms of time management, routines, preventive and reactive strategies with student academic motivation in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The findings suggest that educators should enhance competencies and foster student motivation to boost student engagement and improve learning outcomes. These factors are crucial in promoting a more engaging and effective learning environment for senior high school students.

 

SDG Indicator: #4 (Quality Education)

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


educational management, teacher disposition, classroom management, student academic motivation, student engagement, path analysis, senior high school students, Region XII, Philippines

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, K., & Thompson, R. (2023). Understanding the dynamics of student academic motivation: A comprehensive analysis of motivational factors. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 178-195.

Azhan, K. N. W. K., Jalil, A. A. A., & Putera, S. S. S. P. A. S. (2024). Knowledge and attitudes towards and prevalence of overweight and obesity among undergraduate students at Universiti Kuala Lumpur Royal College of Medicine: A cross-sectional study. Malaysian Family Physician, 19, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.51866/oa.582

Barac, R., Jacobs, L., & Britt, E. (2021). Diversity and inclusion in the college classroom: Engaging students and creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Instructional Research, 10(1), 35-41.

Bastasa, J., & Guhao Jr., E. (2024). Principal leadership, political skills and teacher empowerment: A path model analysis on school climate among public schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(11). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i11.5576

Bhale, U. & Bedi, H. (2024). Sem Model Fit Indices Meaning and Acceptance of Model Literature Support. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4659352

Beymer, P. N., Rosenberg, J. M., & Schmidt, J. A. (2021). Examining instructional and proactive classroom management practices and their associations with classroom engagement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(3), 147-157. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598467.pdf

Byrne, B. M. (2022). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (4th ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Chen, K., & Rodriguez, M. (2021). Understanding the motivation-engagement nexus in contemporary education: A mixed-methods analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 456-471.

Chen, M., & Harrison, P. (2019). Growth mindset and academic motivation: Examining the relationship between beliefs and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 567-582.

Cheng, R., Lam, S. F., & Chan, J. C. (2021). The role of teacher-student relationships in classroom management and student engagement: A multilevel study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 844-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12394

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2023). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-planning-conducting-and-evaluating-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/P200000010566/9780138173784

Cromwell, I. L. (2022). Improving Student Engagement: A Practical Action Research Study on Student Engagement at an Urban High School (Order No. 29444221). Available from ProQuest Central. (2716528352). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/improving-student-engagement-practical-action/docview/2716528352/se-2

Delfino, M. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Psau: Input to services for an Institutional student affairs and services. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.8.6.1

Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., Riley, P., & Waldeyer, J. (2021). Job insecurity predicts teacher commitment and student engagement: A within-classroom, cross-lag investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1156-1174.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-29536-001

Emiru, E. K., & Gedifew, M. T. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy on learning engagement of secondary school students. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308432

Fonseca-Chacana, J. (2021). Exploring the relationship between teacher dispositions, instructional practices, and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103244

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2019). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 61, 52-66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Gopalan, M., & Brady, S. T. (2020). College students' sense of belonging: A national perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 134-137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19897622

Guhao Jr., E. S. (2019). Organizational commitment of public school teachers: A structural equation modeling analysis. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 7(1), 57-91.

Guhao, E. S. & Sichon, D. S. (2020). Implementing An Effective Student Discipline: School Heads‘ Perspective. International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 9(3), 3168 – 3191. Retrieved from https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/mar2020/Implementing-An-Effective-Student-Discipline-School-Heads-Perspective.pdf

Guhao Jr, E. S., & Sioting Jr, R. N. (2023). Organizational trust, teachers’ self-efficacy and culture: A structural equation model on professional learning communities among public elelemntary schools in Region XI. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(6). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i6.4855.

Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly The California School Psychologist, 15(1), 67-79. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03340964

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R.

Jacobs, A. M., Burton, K. A., Milonopoulos, F., & Mouchiroud, C. (2020). The role of motivation in the relationship between academic engagement and achievement. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 19, 1-17.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/befc0f8521c770249dd18726a917cf90.pdf

Larson, L. M., & Shelley, M. C. (2020). Teacher dispositions and student engagement: A case study in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 42 (2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1622623

Lee, S., & Rodriguez, M. (2020). Understanding the connection: Classroom management practices and their influence on student engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 178-193.

Lettink, M. (2020). Development and validation of a questionnaire on classroom management of Dutch secondary education teachers. Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/85419/

Linscott, L. R., & Colvin, G. (2020). The effectiveness of proactive classroom management strategies in promoting positive student behavior and enhancing academic engagement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(3), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719893192

Lohbeck, A., & Möller, J. (2021). Social and dimensional comparisons in the classroom: Links to academic self-concept, student engagement normative beliefs, and teacher enthusiasm. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101970

Lombardi, E., Traficante, D., Bettoni, R., Offredi, I., Giorgetti, M., & Vernice, M. (2021). The impact of teacher emotional intelligence on student engagement, math self-efficacy, and math achievement. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1670440

Mitchell, T. A., & Rodriguez, M. L. (2023). Teacher dispositions, including enthusiasm, empathy, and responsiveness, and their influence on student engagement. Teaching and Learning in Education, 31(2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tle.2023.01.012

Moore, K. A., & Hill, S. (2022). Dispositions of effective teachers: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103683

Pedersen, J., & Blijie, B. R. (2022). Classroom management, student engagement, and achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 217-254. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052176

Quines, L. A., & Piñero, M. Y. (2022). The mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between team work skills and work values of teachers. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(11). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i11.4520

Quines, L. & Relacion, M. (2022). The mediating effect of school climate on the relationship between teacher communication behavior and student engagement. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(22). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i11.4521

Quines, L. & Tubo, F. (2023). The mediating effect of work ethics on the relationship between transformative learning and professional development of teachers. European Journal of Education Studies (10)3. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i3.4706

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2019). Thanks coefficient alpha, we still need you!. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(1), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418791672

Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2019). Students' classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1444-1457.

Ricaplaza, J. & Quines, L. (2022). The mediating effect of time management on the relationship between work ethics and professionalism among public school teachers. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation. 1. 1-12. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i6.1008

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793

Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0006

Smillie, L. D., Loxton, N. J., & Avery, R. E. (2019). Reinforcement sensitivity theory, achievement motivation, and student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 148, 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.019

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Thompson, R., & Wilson, M. (2023). Understanding and promoting student engagement in contemporary educational settings. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 89-106.

Thien, L. M., & Chan, S. Y. (2020). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506

Truscott, D. M., & Obiwo, S. M. (2020). Context Matters: Cultivating Dispositions of Responsive and Equitable Teachers for Urban Schools. School-University Partnerships, Suppl. Special Issue Published: "Equity in Professional Development School Partnerships", 13(3), 22-38. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/context-matters-cultivating-dispositions/docview/2472180090/se-2

United Nations (2023). The 17 goals. Retrieved November 2, 2024, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Utvær, B. K. S., & Haugan, G. (2016). The Academic Motivation Scale: Dimensionality, Reliability, and Construct Validity Among Vocational Students. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 6(2), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.166217

Wang, M. (2024). Linking teaching quality to student engagement: Student–faculty interaction as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality, 52(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.13131

West, C., Baker, A., Ehrich, J. F., Woodcock, S., Bokosmaty, S., Howard, S. J., & Eady, M. J. (2020). Teacher Disposition Scale (TDS): construction and psychometric validation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 185-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1527022

Williams, P., & Chen, K. (2023). The relationship between classroom management effectiveness and student engagement: A comprehensive analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 567-582. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.894503

Williams, S. J., & Park, H. (2020). Understanding the interconnections between teacher factors and student engagement: A path analysis approach. Journal of Research in Education, 30(2), 145-167.

Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i2.5842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Mediatrix J. Anayatin, Lyndon A. Quines

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).