PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND DECISION‑MAKING IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN BUEA

Njonje Joan Nalova

Abstract


This article investigates how principals’ leadership styles shape decision-making processes in public secondary schools in Buea. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 629 staff (teachers and administrators) across 14 schools. Measures included a single best description of the principal’s leadership style and Likert-type items on leadership practices, teacher involvement and consultation, process effectiveness, influence on school culture, perceived student outcomes, and professional development. Transformational (39.6%) and democratic (38.2%) styles predominated; authoritarian (9.5%) and laissez-faire (12.7%) were less common. On core practices promoting contribution, providing clear directives, stressing cooperation, and communicating vision, 78–79% agreed or strongly agreed (mean≈3.67/4). Teacher involvement and consultation averaged 3.48–3.49/4, with ~78% reporting ‘Sometimes/Always’; risk-taking attracted 77.8% disagreement. Leadership style (35.0%) and teacher input (27.7%) emerged as the top decision drivers. Leadership was perceived to positively influence school culture (77.8% ‘Sometimes/Always’) and student outcomes (78.0% Positive/Very positive). The evidence is consistent with recent syntheses linking collaborative leadership with teacher engagement, organizational trust, and learning gains. Recommendations include institutionalizing professional learning communities, consultative forums, and short improvement cycles that de-risk innovation while protecting time for observation and coaching.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


principal leadership styles; decision‑making; teacher involvement; school culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aja-Okorie, U. (2016). Teachers’ personnel management as determinants of teachers’ productivity in secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 4(8), 13–23. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Teachers-Personnel-Management-as-Determinant-of-Teacher-Productivity-in-Secondary-Schools-in-Delta-State-Nigeria.pdf

Akpan, P. C. (2016). Leadership qualities and administrative task performance effectiveness of secondary school principals in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria: Teachers’ perspective. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(6), 237–249. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338802833_LEADERSHIP_QUALITIES_OF_AND_ADMINISTRATIVE_TASK_PERFORMANCE_EFFECTIVENESS_OF_SECONDARY_SCHOOL_PRINCIPALS_IN_AKWA_IBOM_STATE_NIGERIA_TEACHERS'_PERSPECTIVE

Akinwumi, F. & Jayeoba, A. O. (2004). Principles and practice of educational management. Ibandan: Bash-Moses Printing Co.

Arya, M. L. (2015). Relationship between the principal’s administrative behaviour and senior secondary school’s effectiveness in Maradabad. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 2348-2459. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314280396_Relationship_Between_Principal's_Administrative_Behaviour_And_Senior_Secondary_School's_Effectiveness_In_Moradabad

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Learning_to_Improve.html?id=CKZhDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Organizing_Schools_for_Improvement.html?id=xQa21zZgM3MC&redir_esc=y

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/theories-of-educational-leadership-and-management/book258644

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods research approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Research_Design.html?id=4uB76IC_pOQC&redir_esc=y

Ejimabo, N. O. (2015). The influence of decision-making in organizational leadership and management activities. Journal of Entrepreneur Organization Management, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026X.1000138

Fonkeng, G. & Tamajong, E. V. (2009). Secondary school administration and principalship (2nd ed.). Yaounde: Press Universitaires d’Afrique.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/14_The-Principal-Handout_Spring-Summer.compressed.pdf

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from https://wallacefoundation.org/report/how-principals-affect-students-and-schools-systematic-synthesis-two-decades-research

Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652

Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911

Hoy, C. R., & Miskel, G. C. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (8th ed.). Random House, Inc. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Educational_Administration.html?id=ZAvWAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Kraft, M. A., Marinell, W. H., & Yee, D. S. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from NYC. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1449. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573425

Kumur, M. S. & Shilpa, J. (2013). Leadership management: Principles, models and theories. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies. 3 (3), 309-318.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Mbua, F. N. (2003). Educational administration: Theory and practice: The management of organisations and individuals. Design House. Retrieved from https://library.au.int/educational-administration-theory-and-practice-management-organizations-and-individuals-3

Ndongko, M. T. (1989). A handbook on secondary school administration. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Njouny, E. M., & Titanji, P. F. (2016). A study of teachers’ perceptions of involvement in decision making within secondary schools in Cameroon. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n2p165

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Vol. II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2020/03/talis-2018-results-volume-ii_367e0acb.html

Onyali, L. C. & Akinfolarin, A. V. (2017). Principals’ application of instructional leadership practices for secondary school effectiveness in Oyo State. Journal of Nigerian Academy of Education (JONAED), 13(1), 31-44. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580939.pdf

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813

Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600403

Shra’ah, A. E. (2015). The impact of decision-making styles on organizational learning: An empirical study on the public manufacturing companies in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(4), 55–62. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356221961_The_Impact_of_Decision_Making_Styles_on_Organizational_Learning_An_Empirical_Study_on_the_Public_Manufacturing_Companies_in_Jordan

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26medium%3Darticle

Tambo, L. (2003). Principles and Methods of Teaching: Application in Cameroon Schools. University of Buea: ANUCAM Publisher, Limbe.

Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Realizing_The_Power_Of_Professional_Lear.html?id=tS6IX5ZTRCIC&redir_esc=y

Yambo, J. M. & Tuitoek, J. K., F. (2014). Effects of the principals’ decision-making in the management of private secondary schools in Kisumu District, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(4), 52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i4/1013




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i11.6403

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Njonje Joan Nalova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).