TRANSFORMATIVE IMAGES IN EDUCATION VIEWS OF IN-SERVICE TEACHERS CONCERNING THEIR USE WHEN TEACHING LESSONS
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ametller, J. & Pinto, R. (2002). Students’ reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 285-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078914
Bryman, A. (2017). Social Research Methods. Athens: Gutenberg. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Social_Research_Methods.html?id=N2zQCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Carney, R. N. & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260
Cheng, P. C.-H., Lowe, R. K. & Scaife, M. (2001). Cognitive Science Approaches To Understanding Diagrammatic Representations. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006641024593
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44824604_Research_Methods_in_Education
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Los Angeles, Canada: Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033
Denzin, K. & Lincoln, S. (2003). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. https://books.google.ro/books/about/Collecting_and_Interpreting_Qualitative.html?id=ocGxhJEMf0kC&redir_esc=y
Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec, A. & Gril, A. (2003). Students' understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227-1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038231
Girwidz, R., Bogner, F. X., Rubitzko, T. & Schaal, S. (2006). Media-assisted Learning in Science Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Hibernation and Energy Transfer. Science Education International, 17(2), 95-107. Retrieved from https://icaseonline.net/sei/17-02-2006/17-02-2006-95_107.pdf
Halkia, K. & Theodoridis, M. (2002). The use of the image in science school textbooks. A system of classification and evaluation of images. Themes in Education 3(1), 79-95.
Hannus, M. & Hyona, J. (1999). Utilization of Illustrations during Learning of Science Textbook Passages among Low -and High- Ability Children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95-123.
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416884
Holliday, W. G. (1980). Using Visuals to Teach Concepts. Science and Children, 17(7), 9-10. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ224384
Ilaris, F. & Pourkos, M. (2015). Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology and Education. Kallipos, Open Academic Publications.
Iosifidis, Th. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Athens: Kritiki.
Lafatzi, I. (2005). New technologies in Education. Thessaloniki. Kyriakidis Bros. Publications.
Lemke, J. (1995). Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (pp. 87-113). London, NY.: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246905867_Multiplying_meaning_Visual_and_verbal_semiotics_in_scientific_text
Mason, J. (2009). Qualitative Researching. Athens: Ellinika Grammata Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Researching.html?id=8JM4DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Illustrations that instruct. In R. Glaser (Eds.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, vol. 4 (pp. 253-284). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-98783-004
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
Nikolopoulou, K. & Gialamas, B. (2006). Investigation of preschool student-teachers’ assessments of the use of basic ITC skills. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference with International Participation “Information and Communication Technology in Education”, (pp. 821-828). Thessaloniki: Hellenic Association of Information and Communication Technologies in Education.
Patrick, M. D., Carter, G. & Wiebe, E. N. (2006). Visual representations of DNA: A comparison of salient features for experts and novices. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, CA: ΝARST. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7200-6
Petropoulou, G. Mali, A. & Biza, I. (2019). Research Mathematicians in Teaching Practice: Possibilities and Perspectives for the Education of Future Teachers. In K. Christou (Eds.) “Modern Approaches to the Teaching of Mathematics”, (pp. 170 – 178). Cyprus: Association of Researchers in Mathematics Education.
Pozzer-Ardenghi, L.L. & Roth, W. M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89(2), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20045
Reid, D. J. & Beveridge, M. (1986). Effects of Text Illustration on Children's Learning of a School Science Topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb03042.x
Riding, R. J. & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(2), 297-307. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01059.x
Rieber L. P. (2000). Computers, graphics and learning. Madison, Wisconsin: Brown & Benchmark. Retrieved from http://homepage.ufp.pt/lmbg/reserva/livro_graficos%20e%20interface.pdf
Robson, C. (2010). Real-world Research. Athens: Gutenberg Publications. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Real+World+Research%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119959205
Shah, P. & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169
Simatos, A. (1997). Technology and Education. Selection and Use of Supervisory Instruments. Athens: Patakis Publications.
Stylianidou, F. (2002). Analysis of Science Textbook Pictures about ‘Energy’ and Pupils’ Readings of Them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257-283.
Winn, W. & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive Perspectives in Psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 112-142). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410609519-11/cognitive-perspectives-psychology-william-winn
Zangotas, B. (2016). The Multisensory Dynamic of Images in the Teaching Process. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Brothers SA.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i1.6486
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Rallis Vouloutidis, Archontia Foutsitzi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



