WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE 2010 GHANAIAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM? AN EVALUATION USING THE CIPP MODEL
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abukari M A, Marifa H A, Samari J A, Dorsah P, Abudu F, 2022. Senior high school students’ difficulties in learning hybridisation in chemistry. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 80(5), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.630
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, 2019a. Chemistry students’ difficulties in learning oxidation-reduction reactions. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 180–200. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=772989
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, 2019b. Students’ alternative conceptions associated with application of redox reactions in everyday life. Asian Education Studies, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v4i1.590
Adu-Gyamfi K. Ampiah J G, Agyei D D, 2015. High school chemistry students’ alternative conceptions of H2O, OH-, and H+ in balancing redox reactions. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 4(6), 744–758. Retrieved from https://isdsnet.com/ijds-v4n6-6.pdf
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, Agyei D D, 2018. Teachers’ problems of teaching of oxidation-reduction reactions in high schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(5), 53–71. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/2034/4671
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, Agyei D D, 2020. Participatory teaching and learning approach: a framework for teaching redox reactions at the high school level. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, Appiah J Y, 2012. Senior high school students’ difficulties in writing structural formulae of organic compounds. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 175–191. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306012555_Senior_High_School_Students'_Difficulties_in_Writing_Structural_Formulae_of_Organic_Compounds_from_IUPAC_Names
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, Appiah J Y, 2013. Senior high school chemistry students’ performance in IUPAC nomenclature of organic compounds. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 8(4), 472–483. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305827296_Senior_high_school_chemistry_students'_performance_in_IUPAC_nomenclature_of_organic_compounds
Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah J G, Appiah J Y, 2017. Students’ difficulty in IUPAC naming of organic compounds. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77–106. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324797375_Students'_Difficulties_in_IUPAC_Naming_of_Organic_Compounds
Adu-Gyamfi K, Arthur N, Anim-Eduful B, 2024. Teacher general pedagogy and subject matter knowledge for teaching qualitative analysis concepts to chemistry students. International Education and Culture Studies, 4(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.71002/iecs.v4n1p24
Adu-Gyamfi K, Asaki I A, 2022. Teachers’ conceptual difficulties in teaching senior high school organic chemistry. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep22019. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12382
Adu-Gyamfi K, Asaki I A, 2023. Factors contributing to teachers’ conceptual difficulties in teaching high school organic chemistry. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12433
Adu-Gyamfi K, Vorsah R E, 2022. Gender variations favouring male students in the perceived nature of the learning mole concept. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.09
Adjei F, Hanson R, Sam A, Sedegah S, 2022. The use of collaborative approaches on students’ performance in redox reactions. Science Education International, 33(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i2.4
Anim-Eduful B, Adu-Gyamfi K, 2021. Functional group detection: Do chemistry teachers demonstrate conceptual teaching difficulties? Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 21(7), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS7PG47
Anim-Eduful B, Adu-Gyamfi K, 2022. Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307
Aziz S, Mahmood M, Rehman Z, 2018. Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180614.pdf
Baah K. A, Ansah F O, Amoako S K, Boachie S, Kwarteng C, 2020. Using constructivist approach to enhance understanding of mole concept among second year students in chemistry at Adobewura senior high school in Ashanti Region, Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 8(8), 1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i08.el03
Basaran M, Dursun B, Gur Dortok H D, Yilmaz G, 2021. Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701
Bashri A, Prastiwi S M, Pratiwi R, Puspitawati P, 2020. CIPP model for curriculum evaluation of biology education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 491, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.209
Creswell J W, Creswell J D, 2018. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e
Creswell J W, Plano Clark V L, 2018. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
Darling-Hammond L, 2017. Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Darling-Hammond L, Weiz R C, Andree A, Richardson N, Orphanos S, 2009. professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
Deshpande S G, n.d. Upgrading curriculum using C.I.P.P. model. https://www.academia.edu/9937239/CIPP_Model_for_Curriculum_Development_and_evaluation
Essiam C, Osei-Antwi D, Quayson C, 2023. Are chemistry topics difficult to learn? the stance of Ghanaian senior high school students. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 12(2), 112–121. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369816647_ARE_CHEMISTRY_TOPICS_DIFFICULT_TO_LEARN_THE_STANCE_OF_GHANAIAN_SENIOR_HIGH_SCHOOL_STUDENTS
Fullan M, 1991. The new meaning of educational change. Teachers’ College Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_New_Meaning_of_Educational_Change.html?id=OlhdCwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Ghana Statistical Service, 2021. Ghana 2021 population and housing census; General report volume 3A. Populations of regions and districts. Author.
Glatthorn A A, Boschee F, Whitehead B M, Boschee B F, 2012. Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation (3rd ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://newteacherlibraryandtools.square.site/uploads/b/e4443390-f724-11ec-9291-b5b724deb1dc/Curriculum%20Leadership%20Strategies%20for%20Development%20and%20Implementation%20(Allan%20A.%20Glatthorn)%20(z-lib.org).pdf
Imansari N, Sutadji E, 2017. A conceptual framework for curriculum evaluation in electrical engineering education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i3.7624
Joseph A, 2021. Chemistry topic-difficulties perceived by SHS students and how they are addressed by their Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15. https://afribary.com/works/chemistry-topic-difficulties-perceived-by-shs-students-and-how-they-are-addressed-by-their-teachers-and-the-prescribed-textbooks
Lam C C, 2017. Utilising curriculum evaluation to improve the school’s curriculum. In K. H. K., Tan, M. A., Heng, & C. Lim-Ratnam (Eds.). (2017). Curriculum leadership by middle leaders: Theory, design and practice. Taylor & Francis.
Malin J R, 2014. Curriculum evaluation for the improvement of STEM programs of study. Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from https://occrl.illinois.edu/docs/librariesprovider2/prc/curriculum-evaluation.pdf
Marifa H A, Abukari M A, Samari J A, Dorsah P, Abudu F, 2023. Chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching hybridisation. Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13168
Mawutor J D, Adu-Gyamfi K, 2025. Level of female students’ conceptual understanding of atomic orbitals and hybridisation: A mixed method study using a two-tier diagnostic test. London Journal of Research in Humanities & Social Science, 25(11), 65–86. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJRHSS/article/view/1585
Ministry of Education, 2010. Chemistry teaching syllabus for senior high school 1–3. Author.
Narod F, Narrainsawmy V, 2023. Evaluation of the chemistry curriculum at the lower secondary level: feedback from educators. Physical Sciences Reviews. 8(5), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2020-0133
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, 2018. National pre-tertiary education Curriculum Framework for developing subject curricula. Author.
Okrah A K, Ampadu E, Yeboah R, 2020. Relevance of the senior high school curriculum in Ghana in relation to contextual reality of the world of work. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n1p1
Ornstein A C, Hunkins F P, 2009. Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (5th ed.). Pearson. Retrieved from https://ia801800.us.archive.org/21/items/educational-administration-concepts-and-practices/Curriculum%20_%20foundations%2C%20principles%2C%20and%20issues.pdf
Raycroft M A R, Flynn A B, 2020. What works? What’s missing? An evaluation model for science curricula that analyses learning outcomes through five lenses. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 21(4), 1110–1131. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00157c
Rooholamini A, Amini M, Bazrafkan L, Dehghani M R, Esmaeilzadeh Z, Nabeiei P, Rezaee R, Kojuri J, 2017. Program evaluation of an integrated basic science medical curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, using CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(3), 148–154. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5522906/
Sarkodie P A, Adu-Gyamfi K, 2015. Improving students’ performance in naming and writing structural formulae of hydrocarbons using the ball-and-stick models. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education. 24(2), 203–219. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5522906/
Stake R E, 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816706800707
Stufflebeam D L 2003. The CIPP model for evaluation. In T Kellaghan, D L Stufflebeam (Eds.), Handbook of educational evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education (volume 9). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Stufflebeam D, 2004. 21st Century CIPP Model: Origins, Development and Use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ view and influence. SAGE, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157
Stufflebeam D L, Shinkfield A J, 2007. Evaluation theory, models and applications. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://mp-pasca.unpak.ac.id/pdf/Bahan_Ajar/28_(Research%20Methods%20for%20the%20Social%20Sciences)%20Daniel%20L.%20Stufflebeam,%20Chris%20L.%20S.%20Coryn%20-%20Evaluation%20Theory,%20Models,%20and%20Applications-Jossey-Bass%20(2014).pdf
Taş I D, Duman S N, 2021. A systematic review of Postgraduate Theses on Curriculum Evaluation. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 11(1), 43–64. https://doi:10.31704/ijocis.2021.003
Tuju R S, Rumbekwan G, Sinaga D C, Ellss V, Mandacan Y, 2022. Curriculum evaluation model in development higher education curriculum. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 5(1), 2025–2032. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3803
Vishnupriyan M, 2017. Curriculum evaluation: Using the context, input, process and product (CIPP) model for decision making. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education, 18, 12–8. https://www.ijcne.org/text.asp?2017/18/2/12/286264.
Vorsah R E, Adu-Gyamfi K, 2021. High school chemistry teachers’ perspectives and practices on teaching mole concept. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3556.
WAEC, 2011. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2016. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2017. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2018. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2019. West African senior secondary certificate examination, Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2020. West African senior secondary certificate examination, Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2021. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
WAEC, 2022. West African senior secondary certificate examination. Chief examiner’s report, General science programme. Author.
Wolf P, Hill A, Evers F, 2006. Handbook for curriculum assessment: Winter 2006. Guelph, University of Guelph. Retrieved from https://ctlt.ubc.ca/files/2010/08/HbonCurriculumAssmt.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i4.6596
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kenneth Adu-Gyamfi, Isaiah Atewini Asaki, Joyce Delali Mawutor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



