Timo Saloviita


Although detention is one of the most popular methods of punishment in schools, it is being met with increasing criticism as an educational intervention. Few studies have explored its use to date; therefore, the present pilot study was planned to survey the popularity of detention. By analyzing a representative sample of comprehensive school teachers (N = 2,276) in Finland at grade levels 1-9, it was found that 30% of Finnish school teachers regularly use this punishment. Differences in use were observed across gender, age, and teacher category. These results provide a baseline against which future follow-up studies can be compared.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



after-school detention, classroom management, Finland, survey, teachers


Act on Basic Education, 1998. Perusopetuslaki [Act on Basic Education] Finlex 628/1998. Retrieved from

American Academy of Pediatrics, 2003. Out-of-School Suspension and Expulsion. Pediatrics, 112, 1206-1209.

Atkins M S, McKay M M, Frazier S L, Jacobson L J, Arvanitis P, Cunningham T, Lambrecht L, 2002. Suspensions and detentions in an urban, low-income school: Punishment or reward? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 361–371.

Axelrod S, Apsche J, 1983. Eds. The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Bradshaw C P, Mitchell M M, Leaf P J, 2010. Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 12, 133–148.

Caldarella P, Christensen L, Young K R, Densley C, 2011. Decreasing tardiness in elementary school students using teacher-written praise notes. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47, 104–112.

Carr, E G, Levin L, McConnachie G, Carlson J I, Kemp D C, Smith C E, 1994. Communication-based intervention for problem behavior. A user’s guide for producing positive change. Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes

Conover P J, 1990. Detention as a deterrent for late assignments: A study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 16-20, 1990. Retrieved from ERIC database. ED 325910

Costenbader V, Reading-Brown, M, 1995. Isolation timeout used with students with emotional disturbance. Exceptional Children, 61, 353–363.

Childs K E, Kincaid D, George H P, Gage N A, 2015. The relationship between school-wide implementation of positive behavior intervention and supports and student discipline outcomes Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 89–99

Chudgar A, Sankar V, 2008. The relationship between teacher gender and student achievement: Evidence from five Indian states Compare, 38, 627–642 doi:10 1080/03057920802351465

Dewey J, 1902. The child and the curriculum Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press

Henson KT, 2003. Foundations for learner-centered education: a knowledge base. Education, 124, 5-16.

Green J, Barnes D, 1993. Discipline in secondary schools: How administrators deal with student misconduct. Retrieved from ERIC database. ED357507

Grskovic J A, Hall A M, Montgomery D J, Vargas A U, Zentall SS, Belfiore P J, 2004. Reducing time-out assignments for students with emotional/behavioral disorders in a self-contained classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 25–36.

Horner R H, Sugai G, Anderson C M, 2010. Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42, 1–14.

Knaappila T, 2014, December 12. Nykykoululaisetkin joutuvat edelleen jälki-istuntoon [Today’s school children are also obligated to detention]. Länsi-Savo. Retrieved from

Koegel L K, Koegel R L, Dunlap G, 1996.. Positive behavioral support. Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes.

Kohn A, 2006. Beyond discipline. From compliance to community. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Kumpulainen T, Ed.. 2014. Opettajat Suomessa 2013 [Teachers in Finland 2013]. Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2014:8. Helsinki: National Board of Education. 1997. Education Act. Retrieved from

Matson J L, DiLorenzo, T M, 1984. Punishment and its alternati¬ves. A new perspective for behavior modification. New York, NY: Springer.

Meyer L H, Evans I M, 1989. Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems. A manual for home and community. Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes.

MTV, 2015, January 13. Jälki-istunto jäämässä historian: koulut käyttävät monipuolisempia ojentamiskeinoja [Detention losing ground: Schools use a wider variety of discipline. Retrieved from

Nissinen H, 2016, October 10. OAJ: Rehtorin tulisi voida passittaa kiusaaja määräaikaisesti toiseen kouluun [OAJ: Rector should be able to commit the child who bullies to another school] Helsingin Sanomat, Kotimaa. Retrieved from

Peltonen H, Sarpolahti M, 2010. Ojentaminen ja kurinpito [punishment and discipline] In: M Rimpelä, S Fröjd, H Peltonen, Eds. Hyvinvoinnin ja terveyden edistäminen perusopetuksessa 2009 [Promoting well-being and health in primary schools in 2009], pp. 211–216). Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

Pölkki M, 2015, January 13. Jälki-istunnoista on jo luovuttu monissa kouluissa – "keskustelu vaikuttaa paremmin". ,Detention has been phased out in many schools - "discussion has more influence."] Helsingin Sanomat. Retrieved from:

Sailor W, Dunlap G, Sugai G, Horner R, Eds., 2011. Handbook of positive behavior support, pp. 307-326. New York, NY: Springer.

Saloviita T, 2016. What happens at the lesson start? International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, Online first doi:10.1080/22040552.2016.1187651 Retrieved from

Sariola H, 2014. Herra Koivuniemi pantu viralta. 30 vuotta ruumillisen kurittamisen kieltämisestä [Mr Rod deposed. 30 years from a ban on corporal punishment]. Helsinki: Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto. Retrieved from

Sheldon S B, Epstein J L, 2002. Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 4–26.

Spaulding SA, Irvin L K, Horner R H, May S L, Emeldi M, Tobin T J, Sugai G, 2010. Schoolwide social-behavioral climate, student problem behavior, and related administrative decisions. Empirical patterns from 1,510 schools nationwide. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 69–85.

Turner H S, Watson T S, 1999. Consultant’s guide for the use of timeout in the preschool and elementary classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 135–148.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization ,UNESCO, 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain 7–10. June 1994. Paris: Author. Retrieved from

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, 2009. Policy guidelines on inclusive education. Paris: Author. Retrieved from

Waasdorp T E, Bradshaw C P, Leaf P J, 2012. The impact of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 149–156. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.755

Vegas K C, Jenson W R, Kircher J C, 2007. A single-subject meta-analysis of the effectiveness of timeout in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 109–121.

Victoria State Government, 2014. School policy and advisory guide. Retrieved from

Wolery M, Bailey Jr. D B, Sugai G M, 1988. Effective teaching. Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Zabel M K, 1986. Timeout use with behaviourally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 12, 15–21.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Timo Saloviita

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).