APPLICATION OF OUTCOME BASED CURRICULUM DESIGN STRATEGY AS AN EFFECTIVE MECHANISM FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS

P. H. Kusumawathie, Norhisham Mohamad, Ferdous Azam

Abstract


Purpose: Outcome based curriculum one of the fastest implementing curriculum approach in the field of curriculum development process all over the world today. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors affect the intention to use SOLO taxonomy in the development of outcome based curriculum model in the secondary level school education. Method: This study applied SOLO Taxonomy model and input-process-outcome model to develop the conceptual framework for the study. Data is collected through questionnaires filled Accounting teachers in secondary schools, Accounting lecturers, academic staff of Ministry of Education and senior lecturers worked in curriculum development workshops in National Institute in Education (NIE) in Sri Lanka. Findings: It is found that there is a positive, strong and significant relationship between curriculum development inputs and outcome based curriculum development decision making process. Furthermore, there is a moderating effect of age, teaching experience and experience in curriculum development process on the relationship between curriculum development inputs and outcome based curriculum development decision making process. Value: The study addresses the need for curriculum decision making process. The study contributes to the curriculum policy making process. Findings of the study provide necessary guidance for curriculum policy makers and the policy makers in the general education field. Moreover, findings of this study contribute to the area of curriculum development that was beneficial to arrive at the proper decision making in constructing our own curriculum. Finally, the guidelines of this study will fulfill the requirement of the secondary school curriculum development program.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


curriculum development process, outcome based curriculum, solo taxonomy

References


Ashrif A., Noudin, R., Zainal, N., & Husain, H. (2011), Preliminary Study on the Impact of Industrial Talks and Visits towards the Outcome Based Education of Engineering Students, UKM, Teaching and Learning Congress, available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Botagariyeva, T. A., Svetlana S. Kubiyeva, S.S., Venera E., Baizakova, Mambetov, N., Yerkin K. Tulegenov, Alpysbay S. Aralbayev and Dulat U. K. (2016), Studying the Effectiveness of Physical Education in the Secondary School (by the Example of Kazakhstan), International of Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 10, 3575-3594.

Brabrand, C., & Dahl, B. (2008). Constructive Alignment and the SOLO Taxonomy: A Comparative Study of University Competences in Computer Science vs. Mathematics. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, 88, 3-17, available at: http://vbn.aau.dk/files/212444193/CRPITV88Brabrand.pdf

Brabrand, (2009), Using the SOLO Taxonomy to Analyze Competence Progression of University Science Curricula, available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4cd7/5044baaf835e849c485e441a6d6e4f8db132.pdf

Breaugh, M. (2015), Curriculum Committee Chair. The Teacher, March 2015, Volume 53 Number 5, Page 14.

Burgess, E.M. (2014), Leading quality teaching: an exploratory case study of two improving Australian schools, University of Tasmania.

Campbell, A. & Otrel, K. (2011), Teaching Evolution in New Zealand’s Schools Reviewing Changes in the New Zealand Science Curriculum, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226878313_Teaching_Evolution_in_New_Zealand's_SchoolsReviewing_Changes_in_the_New_Zealand_Science_Curriculum

Chaman, M.J. (2014), Factors influencing mathematics achievement of secondary school students in India, University of Tasmania.

Charles C.C., Tsui, M.S., Mandy, Y. C., Chan, Joe, H.H. (2010), Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on Student's Learning Outcomes: An empirical study, Published online: 27 May 2010.

Chinna, K. (2016), Statistical Analysis Using SPSS, Pearson, Malaysia.

Donald, A.J.M. (2014), An investigation into becoming an artist and, University of Tasmania

Dundee, (2011), Outcome-Based Education: the future is today, International Virtual Medical School, UK.

Education Bureau, (2016), School Based Curriculum development in the primary school. The government of Hong Kong.

Erdogan, Y. (2015), Computer Assisted Project-based Instruction: the Effects on Science Achievement, Computer Achievement and Portfolio Achievement, available at: http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji,2015.02.14.

European Union (2010), Learning outcomes approaches in VET curricula A comparative analysis of nine European countries, Luxembourg.

European Union, (2012), Curriculum reform in Europe The impact of learning outcomes. Luxembourg.

Finnish National Board of Education. (2016), Curriculum reform in Finland.

Gary K. W. W. (2010), Outcome-Based Teaching and Learning in Computer Science Education at Sub-degree Level, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2011 ISSN: 2010-3689

Getenet, S.T. (2015), Enhancing Mathematics Teacher Educators' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge through Collaborative Professional Development, University of Tasmania.

Herrmann, A. (2014), Engagement, Technology and Tutors: Experiences of Distance Online Students, University of Tasmania Hobart.

Hopwood, B. (2014), Transition to Secondary School: Student Achievement and Teacher Practice, University of Tasmania.

Jardani, K. S. S. A (2012), English Language Curriculum Evaluation in Oman, International Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 2, No. 5.

Johansson, M. (2006), Teaching Mathematics with Textbooks A Classroom and Curricular Perspective, University of Technology.

Tshai, K.Y. (2014), Outcome-based Education, The Assessment of Programme Educational Objectives for an Engineering Undergraduate Degree, Journal of the Higher Education Academy, Volume 9, 2014 - Issue 1

Karim, N.A.H.A., & Idris, K.Y.Y.S. (2008), Outcome-Based Education: An approach for teaching and learning development Education University, Malaysia, Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education Vol. 3, No. 1, June 2013, 26-35

Lu, J. (2014), An Investigation of University Students' Views about Teaching and Learning English through Their Own Experiences in High Schools and University of Mainland China, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.

María L. & Lizárraga, S.D.A. (2007 ), Factors that affect decision making: gender and age differences, International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy , 2007, 7, 3, 381-391

María T., (2010), Assessing the Quality of Essays Using the SOLO Taxonomy: Effects of Field and Classroom-based Experiences by ‘A’ Level Geography Students Ernest Munowenyu, Published online international research in geographical and environment education

Meng, C. (2007), Innovation of classroom teaching and learning through lesson study- focusing on mathematical communication, Paper presented at the 3rd APEC-Tsukuba International Conference, Japan.

Mezieobi, D. (2012). Gender Issues in the Implementation of Social Studies Curriculum in Nigerian Universities University of Nigeria, Nigeria, US-China Education Review, ISSN 1548-6613

Mladenovic, R. (2009), The identification of variation in students’ understandings of disciplinary concepts: the application of the SOLO taxonomy within introductory accounting

Mohamed, A.H. (2014), Outcome based education performance measurement: a research based longitudinal assessment model to measure information management course LOs, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228466300

Mohayidin, M.G. (2008), Implementation of Outcome-Based Education in Universiti Putra Malaysia: A Focus on Students’ Learning Outcomes, Journal of International Education Studies, Vol. 1, No 4, November 2008.

Morell, L. (2016). Outcomes Based Education Planning & Management What, How, Who Founder & Director Innova HiEd Former IFEES President, ABET Program Evaluator

Niwan, M. (2016), The Effects of Problem-Based-Learning on the Academic Achievements of Medical Students in One Japanese Medical School, Over a Twenty-Year Period Phillip Evans Medical Education Development Center, Gifu University, Japan

Nzilano, J. L. (2015), Influences and Outcomes of Social Constructivist Curriculum Implementation on Tutors’ Beliefs and Practices in Teacher Education Colleges in Tanzania. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2014). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues, 7th Edition, Pearson Educational Leadership.

Piaw, C. Y. (2014), Mastering Research Statics, Hill Education, Malaysia.

Putri, A. (2014). Teachers’ Perceptions toward the Implementation of School-Based Curriculum (SBC) in Indonesia. ISSN 2408-1809 Rangsit, Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 3, No.1, pp.41-47,

Ranjani, R.P.C. (2014), Outcome-Based Education (OBE) using Student Centered Learning (SCL): The Case of Faculty of Commerce and Management Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

Raselimo, M. & Mahao, M. (2015), The Lesotho curriculum and assessment policy: Opportunities and threats, South African Journal of Education, Volume 35, Number 1, February 2015 1, 1041, 12 pages, available at: http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za

Salum, K. P. (2014), Curriculum development in Tanzania: an investigation of the formulation, management and implementation of the 2005 curriculum reform in selected disadvantaged districts, University of Glasgow.

Saville, M. (2015), A Study of Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Education with Interactive Whiteboards, University of Tasmania at Launceston.

Scalese, R.J., Gaghie, W.C., Issenbergs, S.B., & Petrusa, E.R. (2012). Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education, available at:

Shea, P. (2010), The Community of Inquiry Framework Meets the SOLO Taxonomy: A Process-Product Model of Online Learning. University at Albany, State University of New York, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09523987.2011.576514?journalCode=remi20

Sopantini, (2014), Reforming teaching practice in Indonesia A case study of the implementation of active learning in primary schools in North Maluku, University of Tasmania.

Sriram, S. (2016), Outcome-Based Education: Building Student Success Models With Outcome-Based Curriculum Mapping Tools, https://elearningindustry.com/outcome-based-education-mind-mapping available at:

Sriram, S. (2016), Outcome-Based Education: How Automated Mind Mapping Builds Student Success Using automated tools to support outcome-based education, teaching, and assessments will improve learning outcomes and accelerate, available at: https://www.creatrixcampus.com/blog/10-steps-improve-education-quality-and-student-achievement-outcome-based-education

Sullivan, R. (2014), A review of New Zealand’s EOTC policy and curriculum: Changing meanings about safety, available at: http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/CM2014_10_073_0.pdf

Wilson, M.L. (2011), Students' learning style preferences and teachers instructional strategies: correlation between matched style and academic achievement, Liberty University

World Bank, (2016), Sri Lanka, Transforming the School Education System as the Foundation of a Knowledge Hub.

Wright, F. (2014), Enhancing an understanding of the pedagogical needs of culturally and linguistically diverse adult TAFE students, University of Tasmania.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.999

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Special Education Research (ISSN 2501 - 2428) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).