DEVELOPMENT OF LESSON PLAN INSTRUMENT ON POGIL MODEL FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Putri Anggraini, B. Badruzsaufari, Uripto Trisno Santoso

Abstract


This research is aimed to develop a lesson plan instrument with a POGIL model on validity and practical. The research method used is Tesmer model which covers: 1) self evaluation; 2) expert review; 3) one-to-one; 4) small group; and 5) field test. The lesson plan instrument covers the syllaby, lesson plans, materials, students workbook, observation sheet cognitive, observation sheet critical thinking skills, observation sheet activities of teachers and students, observation sheet response of participants, observation sheet self regulation, and observation sheet psychomotor skills. The research in SMPN 2 Alalak. The results of the study show that: 1) the validity of lesson plan instrument based on experts is category as very valid, the level of readability of the module and students workbook is category as good; 2) the practicality of learning devices based on the implementation of lesson plans instrument is very good.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


lesson plan instrument, development research, POGIL, critical thinking skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anam, K. 2015. Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri Metode dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Akker, J.V.D., Gravemeijer, K., Mckenney, S., and N. Nieveen. 2006. Educational Design Research. Educational design research seminar organized by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; Program Council for Educational Research (NWO/PROO): Netherlands.

Bassham, G., Irwin, H., Nardonedan Wallace. 2010. Critical Thinking: A Student Introduction 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill Company, Inc.

Brickman, et al. 2009. Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3 No. 2 Article 16.

Broadbear, J. 2003. Essential Elements of Lesson Designed to Promote Critical Thinking. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL). Vol. 3(3), pp 1-8.

Costa, L. A. 2001. Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. ASCD. Melbourne. AU.

Dewi, K., Sadia,W.I., and P.N. Ristiati. 2013. Pengembangan Perangkat RPP IPA Terpadu dengan Setting Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan KinerjaIlmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pascasarjana Undiksha (online), 3(1), http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/viewFile/548/340. accessed on April 5, 2018.

Ennis, R.H. 1993. Critical Thinking Assesment. Journal Theory and Practice, Vol.32(2), pp 176-186.

Filsaime, D.K. 2007. Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Edisi ke-2 translated by Sunarni. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Raya.

Hanson, D. and Wolfskill, T. 2006. Process Workshops: A New Model For Instruction. Journal of Chemistry Education 77 (2006).

Hosnan. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Jaya, I.M. Sadia, I.W. and Arnyana, I.B.P. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Dengan Setting Guided Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, Volume 4 Tahun 2014.

Liliasari. 2009. Inovasi Pembelajaran IPA: Mengapa dan Bagaimana? Workshop Paper of International Pendidikan IPA. SPS UPI. Bandung.

Nadziroh, A., Setiadi, I., Fahmi. 2018. The Effect of Inquiry Model On Science Process Skills and Learning Outcomes. European Journal of Education Studies. ISSN: 2501 - 1111. ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111. Vol. 4. Issue. 12. pp. 177-182. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1344846. www.oapub.org/edu

Robbins, S. 2005. The Path to Critical Thinking. Harvard: HBS Working Knowledge.

Simonson and Shadle. 2013. Implementing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Undergraduate Biomechanics: Lessons Learned by a Novice. Kinesiology Faculty Publications and Presentations: Department of Kinesiology.

Singh, P.J., vickneswary, M., Diwiyah, M. Raidah, H. and A. Rahim. 2017. Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on critical Thinking Skills of secondary School Students. International Journal of Informative and Futuristic Research. ISSN :2347-1697.

Taherdoost, H. 2016. Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) 5(3), 2016, pp: 28-36.

Tawil, Muhammad and Bunga Dara Amin. 2013. Portofolio-Based Physics Learning Model To Improve Critical Thinking Skills. International Jurnal of Education and Research 1:5. http://www.ijem.com/journal/September-2013/43.pdf) accessed on 3 April 2018.

Tessmer, M. 1998. Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London: Cogan Page.

Trautmann, N.M., Carlsen, Krasny, and C.M. Cunringham. 2000. Integrated Inquiry. The Science Teacher, 67 (6), pp 52-55.

Warsono and Hariyanto. 2012. Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Yuliani, N.P., Margunayasa, G., Parmiti, D.S. 2017. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POGIL Berbantuan Peta Pikiran Terhadap Hasil belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD. Journal of Education Technology, Vol. 1 No. (2): pp. 117-123

Zubaidah, S., S. Mahanal, L. Yuliati, and D. Sigit. 2014. Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam buku Guru. SMP/MTS Kelas VIII. Puskurbuk, Balitbang, Kemendikbud. Jakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v0i0.2148

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies (ISSN 2501-5915) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).