Bamidele Emmanuel Folounrunso, Ariyo Oyeniyi Sunday


The study compared the performance of students in Chemistry when taught with guided discovery and demonstration teaching techniques in senior secondary schools. It determined the effectiveness of guided discovery and demonstration teaching techniques in enhancing male and female students’ performance in Chemistry. The study adopted a non-equivalent pre-test, posttest control group research design. The population for the study consisted of Chemistry students in senior secondary schools in Ile–Ife. The sample consisted of Eighty four (84) students from three schools in Ife Central Local Government Area of Osun State which were selected using simple random sampling technique. One intact class each was used. The schools were randomly assigned to three groups (Guided Discovery, Demonstration and Teacher Expository) using simple random sampling technique. Two instruments were utilized for the study. They were Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) and Questionnaire on Attitudes of Students towards Chemistry (QASTC). Data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).The results showed that, there was a significant difference in the performance of students exposed to guided discovery, demonstration teaching technique and those exposed to teacher expository teaching technique (F= 123.972 ; p< 0.05). The findings also showed that, there was a significant difference in the performance of male and female Chemistry students exposed to guided discovery and demonstration teaching techniques (F= 12.04; p< 0.05). This showed that male and female students performed better when exposed to guide discovery teaching techniques. The post-hoc analysis revealed that, Guided Discovery Teaching Technique (GDTT) had a better significant effect on student academic performance than Demonstration Teaching Technique (DTT) and Teacher Expository Teaching Technique (TETT). The post - hoc analysis revealed that, male and female students exposed to GDTT performed better than those exposed to DTT and that, those exposed to GDTT had the best retention ability of the concept taught. The study concluded that, guided discovery teaching technique is a better teaching technique on students’ performance in Chemistry than demonstration teaching technique and the teacher expository method respectively.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



demonstration, guided discovery, teaching, techniques, chemistry achievement


Adedeji, A. A., Oloyede, E. O., Bamidele, E. F. & Bada, T. A. (2012). Comparative Effectiveness of Video media instruction and laboratory teaching technique in learning practical chemistry in Nigeria senior secondary schools. Mediterranean center of Social and Education Research (JESR) 2. 1311

Adegbola, R. A. (2005). Effects of guided discovery and self-learning strategies on secondary school students’ learning outcome in chemistry. Unpublished M. Ed dissertation of University Ibadan, Ibadan

Adeyemo, D. A. (2004). “Patterns of Emotional Intelligence among Counseling Psychology Students in a Nigerian University” Sokoto Educational Review, 7: 194-203

Akeju, O. A. (2001). Relative effectiveness of teacher demonstration and structural inquiry and gender on subjects learning outcomes in chemistry practicals. University of Ibadan Education and Information studies Abstract, 2000-2002.

Akinbobola A. O. and Afolabi F. (2009) Constructivist practices through guided discovery approach: the effects on students’ cognitive achievements in Nigerian senior secondary school physics. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Educational Policy (BJSEP); 3(2)

Alabi, T. O. and Lasisi, N.(2015) Effects of guided discovery and problem solving on achievement of secondary school students’ in volumetric analysis in Niger State. ATBU, Journal of Science, Technology & Education (JOSTE); 3(4), 14-21.

Bamidele, E. F. and Oloyede E. A (2013). Comparative Effectiveness of hierarchical, flowchart and spider concept mapping strategies on student’s performance in secondary school chemistry. World Journal of Education; 1(3)

Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning and its implications for curriculum development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ewona, G. (2002). Teaching agriculture in schools. In Umoh, M.(Ed), Method of agricultural education. Abuja. Hill Alex Ventures.

Irinoye, J. Bamidele, E. F., Adetunji, A. A., Awodele, B. A. (2015). Relative Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and Demonstration Methods on Students Performance in Practical Chemistry in Secondary School in Osun State, Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(2), 21-30.

Ogwu, C. E. (2002). Effective teaching methods. Enugu: Cheston Limited.

Oloyede, O. I. (2004). Effect of small group instructional techniques on chemistry Achievement of senior secondary schools slow learners. Abujous, 2(2), 221-227

Olorundare, A. S. & Aderogba, G. A. (2009). Comparative effects of concept-mapping, analogy and expository strategies in secondary school students’ performance in chemistry in Ilesa, Nigeria .Journal of Curriculum and Instruction., 17(1&2), 90-100

Omwirhiren, E. M. (2002). The effect of guided discovery and traditional methods on the achievement of SSCE students in chemical energetic. African Journal of Research in Education, 2(1&2), 21-24

Ozomadu, E. A. (2016). Effectiveness of guided discovery and expository methods on students’ achievement in senior secondary school mathematics .Department of Computer Science and Mathematics. Retrieved from online from Google search.

Ugwuanyi, J. U. (1998) Effects of guided discovery and expository teaching methods on student’s achievement in Physics in selected secondary schools in Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Technical Education, 15(1), 167-171.

Umoh, M. and Etuk, L. (2003). Principle of curriculum development in agriculture education. Abuja: Hill Alex Ventures.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. The development of higher mental processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Bamidele Emmanuel Folounrunso, Ariyo Oyeniyi Sunday

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).