CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, RELIGIOUS PROPAGANDA AND RADICALIZATION IN KENYAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
Abstract
Radicalisation which leads to violent extremism has been a worrisome phenomenon which has assumed global dimension and has engaged the attention and concern of governments, civil society, security agencies and institutions. The violent aspect of radicalisation has greatly decimated populations, maimed innocent citizens and destroyed unqualified number of property. This negatively affects the social-economic and political development of affected nations. Religion which occupies a central position in human life becomes a medium of propagating this socio-political conflict into a moral one. This research surmises that the misuse of Religion is executed by those whose motivations and aims have a predominant religious influence is rooted in the misinterpretation of theological epithets, or it could be the result of extreme forms of delusion that may alter reality, and thus subject an individual or a group of people to distorted versions of religious facts and episodes. The research uses Kant’s philosophy of categorical imperative as its theoretical framework. The theory states that we should always treat people as an end rather than means to an end. The research reveals that the focus on training of highly skilled labour at the expense of instilling values in learners makes it possible for radical elements to target them and use them as means for their political end. Religion that is also supposed to play a vital role in society is also being used as a means to an end rather than an end itself. The research recommends pedagogical reorientation so as learners as exposed to all forms of religion, by doing this they will appreciate others who have divergent religious views thus value their dignity.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Allison, H. (1990). Kant’s theory of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Journal of
Psychology. 3(3), 265-299.
Biddle, W. (1931). A psychological definition of propaganda. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 26(3), 283-295
Borum, B. (2011). Radicalisation into violent extremism II: A review of conceptual models and empirical research. Journal of Strategic Security Studies. 4(4), 37-61.
Botha, A. (2014). Political socialization and terrorist radicalisation among individual who joined Al-Shabaab in Kenya. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 37(11), 895-919
Botha, A. (2013). Assessing the vulnerability of Kenyan youth to radicalisation and extremism. Institute of Security Studies Paper 245.
Buttonwood, N. (2003). Faith schools and individual autonomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education 37(37).
Cannon, B. (2016). Terrorists, Geopolitics and Kenya’s Proposed Border Wall with Somalia. Journal of Terrorism Research. 7(2), pp.23–37.
Cranston, E. (2014). Ideology and religion philosophical context. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 10, April from
http://www.britannica.com/topic/ideology-society.
Drake, J. (1996). The phenomenon of conservative terrorism. Autumn. 8(3) 29-4.
Giesenger, J. (2011, June 9). Dignity and education. Paper presented at the 2011 the conference on Encountering Children-Dignity, Autonomy and Care, University of Zurich. From http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Gregor, J. (1996). A commentary on Kant’s critique of practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1952). The critique of practical reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kanz, H. (1999). Immanuel Kant. Paris: international Bureau of Education.
Kissinger, H. (2011). Comparing Somali’s Al-Shabaab and Uganda’s lord’s resistance army. Institute of Security Studies Paper 265.
McCauley, C. & Moskalenko, T. (2008). Mechanism of political radicalisation Pathway towards radicalisation, 20:415-433.Utrecht University: Retrieved on October 5, 2015 from http://dspace.library.uu.nl
Mohamed, G. (2011, November 2). Hounding Somalis hurts terror fight. The star, p. 6.
Monsoor, M. (2010). Defining politics. Political Journal, 3(4) 55-56.
Otiso, K. (2009). Kenya in the crosshairs of global terrorism: fighting terrorism at the periphery Kenya Studies Review 1(1).
Paton, H. (1971). The categorical imperative. A study of Kant’s moral philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania press.
Pratkanis, R., & Aronson, E. (1991). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Rachels, J. (1986). The idea of human dignity. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 122-123.
Reath, A. (2006). Agency and autonomy in Kant’s moral theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robert, L. (2015, May 8). Education ministry to review school curriculum to tackle radicalisation, insecurity. Daily Nation. Retrieved on October 3, 2015. From http://www.nation.co.ke/counties
Rosand, E., Millar, A. & Ipe, J. (2007). Enhancing counter-terrorism in Eastern Africa, African Security Review, 18(2).
Stumf, S. (1977). History and problems of philosophy. New York: McGraw Hills.
Taha, A., Zahra, & Al-Khaoli, S (2008). The Marxist approach to ideology. Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies. 30(2) 1-14.
Terry, E. (1976). Criticism and ideology. London: NLB.
Van San, M., Sieckelinck, S. & De winter, M. (2013). Ideals adrift: An educational approach to radicalisation. Journal of Ethics and Education, 8(3). 276-289.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Mwenesi Jephthar, Juma Injendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).