EXAMINATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (TPACK) SELF-EFFICACY FOR PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS ON MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
In this research the authors aimed at determining the TPACK self-efficacy for pre-service science teachers on material development, the relational screening model was used. The research was carried out with a total of 141 pre-service science teachers from Kahramanmaraş Sütcü Imam University in 2016-2017 fall academic years. The data were collected by using the "Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy scale for pre-service science teachers on material development" developed by Balçın and Ergün (2016). Independent-t test, one way variance analysis (Anova) and Tukey analysis were used in the statistical evaluation of the obtained data. Also, data are evaluated on 0.05 level relevance and its percentage, frequency, average and standard deviation levels are calculated. According to the findings obtained in the research, it was determined that the variables of grade level and teaching technologies and material development courses were influenced by TPACK self-efficacy for pre-service science teachers on material development (p<0.05). However, it was determined that gender, level of academic achievement and intensity of technology use did not affect the TPACK self-efficacy for pre-service science teachers on material development.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Açıkgül, K., & Aslaner, R. (2015). Investigation of TPACK confidence perception of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 118-152.
Akçay, H., Feyzioğlu, B., & Tüysüz, C. (2003). The effect of computer simulations on students’ success and attitudes in teaching chemistry. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 7-26
Akdeniz, A.R. & Akbulut, Ö.E. (2010). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının geliştirdikleri yapılandırmacı öğretim etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 4(1), 50-63.
Alkan, C., & Hacıoğlu, F. (1997). Öğretmenlik Uygulamaları. Ankara: Alkım Yayınevi.
Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge on the basis of their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K–12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved, 25.10.2016 from www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article2.cfm.
Bal, M. S., & Karademir, N. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) konusunda öz-değerlendirme seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 15-32.
Balçın, D.M. & Ergün, A. (2016).Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının materyal geliştirme konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) öz-yeterlik ölçeği: geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(3), 109-122.
Baran, E., Chuang, H. H., & Thompson, A. (2011). TPACK: An emerging research and development tool for teacher educators. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 370-377.
Birişçi, S. & Metin, M. (2009). Fen konularına yönelik web sayfası hazırlama öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar teknolojisini kullanabilme becerilerini nasıl etkiler?. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 74-93.
Burgoyne, N., Graham, C.R., & Sudweeks, R. (2010). The Validation of an Instrument Measuring TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3787-3794). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., S., & Guzey, S. (2013) Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for preservice science teachers: Construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 52, 37–60.
Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve özyeterlikleri. (Yayımlanmış Doktora tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Carr, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., Litzinger, M. E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution: The role of systematic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, 38(1), 5-14.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.
Devecioglu, Y. (2004). An approach to develop physics student teachers’ skills for developing and applying teacher guided materials. (Unpublished Master’s thesis), Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
Devecioglu, Y. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2007, September 3-7). The effectiveness of the special teaching methods course-ii to develop the planning and presenting skills of student teachers. XIII World Congress of Comparative Education Societies, Faculty of Philosophy of Sarajevo University.
Devecioglu, Y. & Akdeniz, A.R. (2010). An approach to develop physics student teachers’ skills of using instructional technology, US-China Education Review, 7(8), 95-101
Dikmen, C. H., & Demirer, V. (2016). Türkiye'de Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi Üzerine 2009-2013 yılları arasında yapılan çalışmalardaki eğilimler.Turkish Journal of Education, 5(1), 33-46.
Doğan, M. (2010). Primary trainee teachers’attitudes to and use of computer and technology in mathematics: The case of Turkey. Educational Research and Review, 5(11), 690-702.
Erdem, M. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayıncılık.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. ETR&D, 47(4), 47-61.
Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749–760.
Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). Improving the technology integration skills of prospective teachers through practice: A case study. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4),71-81.
Güven, S. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme dersinin kazandırdığı yeterlikler yönünden değerlendirilmesi (İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 165-179.
Karakaya, F., & Avgın, S.S. (2016). Investigation of teacher science discipline self-confidence about their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). European Journal of Education Studies, 2(9), 1-20.
Kaya, Z.(2006). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Kaya, Z., Özdemir, T. Y., Emre, İ., & Kaya, O. N. (2011, September). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz-yeterlik seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. In 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium (pp. 22-24).
Karasar, N.(2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.). The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Educators (p.3-30). New York: Routledge.
Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J. Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
Koehler M. J, Mishra, P., & Yahya, K (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
MaKinster, J., Boone, W., & Trautmann, N. (2010, March). Development of an instrument to assess science teachers’ perceived tecnological pedagogical content knowledge. Poster session presented at the 2010 annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Meriç, G. (2014). Determining Science Teacher Candidates' Self-Reliance Levels with regard to Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge/fen ve teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPABGÖ) konusunda özgüven seviyelerinin belirlenmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(2), 352-367.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
North, A. S., & Noyes, J. M. (2002). Gender influences on children’s computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 135-150.
Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü (ÖYEGM). (2008). Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel ve Özel Alan Yeterlikleri, Ankara.
Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü (ÖYEGM). (2006). Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel Yeterlikleri, Ankara.
Önal, N., & Çakir, H. (2015). Eğitim fakültesi öğretim elemanlarının teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgilerine ilişkin özgüven algıları. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,12/2(24), 117-131.
Övez, F. T. D., & Akyüz, G. (2013). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yapılarının modellenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(170), 321-334.
Özgen, K., Narlı, S., & Alkan, H. (2013). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ve teknoloji kullanım sıklığı algılarının incelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 44(44), 31-51.
Öztürk, E. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin bazı değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 223-228.
Öztürk, E. ve Horzum, M. B. (2011). Teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 255-278.
Pamuk, S., Ergun, M. Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9278-410.1007/s10639-013-9278-4
Sancar-Tokmak, H., Konokman, G. Y., & Yelken, T. Y. (2013). Mersin üniversitesi okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) özgüven algılarının incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 35-51.
Seferoğlu, S. S. (2009). Yeterlikler, standartlar ve bilişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler ışığında öğretmenlerin sürekli mesleki eğitimi. Eğitimde Yansımalar IX: Türkiye'nin Öğretmen Yetiştirme Çıkmazı Ulusal Sempozyumu, ss. 204-217.Başkent Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi ve Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı, 12-13 Kasım 2009, Başkent Üniversitesi Bağlıca Kampüsü, Ankara.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4-14.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April 13-17, San Diego, California.
Soong, S.K.A. & Tan, S.C. (2010). Integrating technology into lessons using a TPACK-based design guide. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp.919-923). Proceedings ascilite Sydney, Australia.
Şahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105
Şişman, M. (2000). Öğretmenliğe Giriş. (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Timur, B., & Taşar, M. F. (2011). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz güven ölçeğinin (TPABÖGÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 839-856.
Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M.K. (Winter 2008-2009). The evolution of the required educational technology course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25 (2) 67-71.
Yavuz Konakman, G, Yanpar Yelken, T. ve Sancar Tokmak, H. (2013). Sınıf ö retmeni adaylarının TPAB’lerine ilişkin algılarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi: Mersin Üniversitesi örneği. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(2), 665-684.
Yükseköğretim Kurumu (YÖK). (2006). Öğretmen yeterlikleri. Web: http://otmg.meb.gov.tr/belgeler/MEGEP%20kapsam%C4%B1nda%20MEB%20ve%20Y%C3%96K%20taraf%C4%B1ndan%20belirtilen%20%C3%B6%C4%9Fretmen%20yeterlikleri.doc (25.10.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.527
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Ferhat Karakaya, Mustafa Yazici
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
