WHY TEACHERS FACES MISCONCEPTION: A STUDY TOWARD NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHERS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS
Abstract
This present aims at identifying and describing the misconception faced by primary school teachers in natural science subject. This is a descriptive qualitative study which is conducted to 50 primary school teachers. The data are gathered through observation sheet, interview, and diagnostic test. The data are further analyzed descriptively through four stages analysis, namely data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and making conclusion. The result of the study shows that there are 74.6 % of total responses of misconception and non-misconception. On the other hand, there are 25.4% who have the scientific concepts. Mostly, the misconception occurs on, 1) the concept of substances which are needed for photosynthesis on plants, 2) concepts of the needs of sunlight in photosynthesis, 3) the concepts of substance density, and 4) the concepts of free fall motion.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Akbas, Y & Gencturk, E. (2011). The effect of conceptual change approach to eliminate 9th grade high school students’ misconceptions about air pressure. Educationals Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2217-2222
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R. I. (2013). Learning how to teach (9th Ed). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
Buaraphan, K. (2011). Pre-service physics teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. US-China Education Review, 8(2), 137-148.
Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3 (4), 193-206
Degeng, I N. S. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran: Klasifikasi variable untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung, Indonesia: Aras Media
Gagne, R.M. (1985). The Condition of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: CBS College Publishing.
Hershey, D. R. (2004). Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. Available on http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey.html, (Access on October, 31st 2016).
Howe, A. C. (1993). A Vygotskian Perspective on Teaching for Conceptual Change. In The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Misconceptions Trust: Ithaca, New York.
Laksana, D.N L. (2014). Profil pemahaman konsep IPA guru-guru kelas sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Ngada. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 1 (1), 15-26.
Longfield, J. (2009). Discrepant teaching events: Using an inquiry stance to address students’ misconceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21 (2), 265-271
NRC—National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. DC: National Academies Press.
Piaget, J. (2000). Commentary on Vygotsky. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(2000), 241–259.
Reigeluth, C. M. & Carr-Cheliman, A. A. (2009). Theories for different outcomes of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, & A. A. Carr-Cheliman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base, Vol. 3 (pp. 195-197), New York: Routledge.
Seraphin, K. D., Philippoff, J., Kaupp, L., & Vallin, L. M. (2012). Metacognition as means to increase the effectiveness of inquiry-based science education. Science Education International, 23 (4), 366-382
Setiawati, G.A.D. (2011). Kajian miskonsepsi dalam materi fotosintesis dan respirasi tumbuhan pada mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011. Tesis (Unpublished). Singaraja, Indonesia: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Thompson, F. & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553-559.
Timur, S. (2012). Preschool teachers concerning the subject “force and motion”. Educationals Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3038-3049.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.914
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Dek Ngurah Laba Laksana, I. Nyoman Sudana Degeng, I. Wayan Dasna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).